StrongerBible

shasas

שָׁסַס

HebrewH8155plunder, spoil, ...

Appears 6 times · tap a cell to see the verses

Jdg 2:141Sa 17:53Psa 89:41(42)Isa 13:16Jer 30:16Zec 14:2
Root family
Word studyResearch-gradeshah-SAHSverb

What shasas means

to plunder: to strip people or a place bare by force, the way raiders do when they ransack whatever they overrun

TranslatabilityApproximateCertaintySettled

Hebrew has several words for taking plunder, and this is the rarest of them. Where the two ordinary words for it, "shalal" (שָׁלַל) and "bazaz" (בָּזַז), simply report that spoil was carried off, this one keeps the raid itself in view: an enemy sweeping through a camp, a village, or a whole nation and stripping it of everything worth taking. Its targets are equally people, the places they live, and the storerooms where their valuables are kept.

The same word names both halves of the act. As a verb it is what raiders do; used as a name for a person it is the raider himself, the plunderer. Judges 2:14 puts the two together in one sentence: God handed Israel over to plunderers, and they plundered them. Two shapes of the one word stand side by side there, and the repetition is deliberate. These were plunderers who really did plunder.

What unsettles readers is who stands behind the plundering. In Judges and in Kings it is God himself who hands his own people over to raiders, so that foreign looting becomes the sentence on a nation that abandoned him. The prophets then turn the word around into a promise: the nations that stripped Israel bare will be stripped bare themselves, and those who plunder will become plunder (Jeremiah 30:16).

The word shows up in three settings, and they are worth telling apart:

  • in the histories, as the punishment God carries out on a people who have left him
  • in the prophets, as the warning that the plunderer will one day be plundered
  • in the Psalms, as the raw complaint of people who have been robbed and want God to notice

Nuances

1ato plunder people: to strip persons or a whole nation of what they own by force
Jdg 2:14Psa 44:10Psa 89:41(42)Isa 42:22
1bto ransack a place: to empty a camp, a town, or a storehouse of what is kept there
1Sa 17:531Sa 23:1Isa 10:13Isa 13:16Hos 13:15Zec 14:2
1ca plunderer: the raider who does the stripping
TranslatabilityDirect
Jdg 2:14Jdg 2:161Sa 14:482Ki 17:20Isa 17:14Jer 30:16Jer 50:11

What scholars say about shasas

The geminate שָׁסַס and the weak-final שָׁסָה are byforms of a single plunder-root. BDB glosses שָׁסַס as "id." and marks it a parallel form of שׁסה; HALOT and DCH likewise print separate but cross-referenced headwords with identical glosses, and none of the standard lexica posits two semantically distinct roots. The Kethib/Qere split at Jeremiah 30:16 (Kethib שֹׁאֲסַיִךְ, which BDB calls an Aramaic form with intrusive aleph, against Qere שֹׁסַיִךְ) preserves both shapes in a single word and is the decisive internal evidence. The root is a rarer synonym of שָׁלַל and בָּזַז and stands in poetic parallel with them (Isaiah 17:14; 42:22; Jeremiah 30:16). Distribution is concentrated in the Deuteronomistic History, where YHWH is the agent handing Israel to raiders as covenant curse (Judges 2:14; 2 Kings 17:20; so Webb, Cogan and Tadmor), and in the prophets, where the same verb carries the reversal of judgment on the plunderers (Jeremiah 30:16; 50:11; Isaiah 17:14; so Holladay and Lundbom) and eschatological siege (Zechariah 14:2). Three cruxes recur. At Isaiah 42:24 the consonantal לִמְשׁוֹסֶה is read by BDB and older critics (Duhm, Cheyne, Marti) as a Poel participle "plunderer" against the Qere noun מְשִׁסָּה, with the Septuagint's τοῖς προνομεύουσιν favouring the participial reading and the sense scarcely differing either way; at 1 Samuel 14:48 the form שֹׁסֵהוּ is discussed as a possible old plural (Driver, Budde, McCarter); and at Hosea 13:15 the subject of יִשְׁסֶה is debated between the east wind and Assyria by metonymy (Andersen and Freedman against Wolff), though the verb itself is secure. The Septuagint renders the root with προνομεύω and διαρπάζω and their nominal derivatives, the Vulgate with vastare, diripere, and praedari. Etymology is the weak point of the dossier: no secure cognate is attested outside Hebrew (Akkadian šasû "to call" is a homophone, not a cognate, and the Ugaritic proposal is speculative), and the much-discussed link to the Egyptian designation Šꜣsw is contested (see the recorded dispute). A distinct verbal attestation at Qumran or in Ben Sira is unconfirmed; what survives into later Hebrew is the noun מְשִׁסָּה "booty", carried on in the liturgical poem Lekhah Dodi, which adapts Jeremiah 30:16 and preserves the Kethib's aleph.

Where scholars disagree about shasas

Whether the Hebrew verb for plundering is connected to Šꜣsw, the Egyptian designation for the Bedouin groups of the Levant, and if so in which direction the derivation ran.

  • majorityThere is no connection. The Egyptian designation derives from an Egyptian verb meaning "to wander", so it names nomads rather than plunderers, and the Hebrew verb is native.; Manfred Weippert, "Semitische Nomaden des zweiten Jahrtausends: Über die Šꜣśw der ägyptischen Quellen," Biblica 55 (1974): 265-280, 427-433; P. Jensen, Zeitschrift für Assyriologie 10 (1895): 331
  • minorityThe Egyptian designation and the Hebrew plunder verb are genuinely connected, the Egyptian name reflecting the Semitic word for plundering.; W. Max Müller, Asien und Europa nach altägyptischen Denkmälern (Leipzig: Engelmann, 1893), 131; BDB, s.v. שָׁסָה
  • minorityThe ethnic name came first and the verb was formed from it: the raiding reputation of these groups gave rise to a Canaanite and Hebrew verb meaning "to plunder".; Donald B. Redford, Egypt, Canaan, and Israel in Ancient Times (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1992), 269-275
In-depth research

This is a research paper, so it may be hard to read without scholarly background. It is useful if you want to dig even deeper into this word.

Sources

  • BDB, s.v. שָׁסָה and שָׁסַסlexicon
  • HALOT, s.v. שׁסה and שׁססlexicon
  • David J. A. Clines, ed., The Dictionary of Classical Hebrew, s.v. שׁסה and שׁססlexicon
  • Manfred Weippert, "Semitische Nomaden des zweiten Jahrtausends: Über die Šꜣśw der ägyptischen Quellen," Biblica 55 (1974): 265-280, 427-433journal-article
  • Donald B. Redford, Egypt, Canaan, and Israel in Ancient Times (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1992), 269-275monograph
  • W. Max Müller, Asien und Europa nach altägyptischen Denkmälern (Leipzig: Engelmann, 1893), 131monograph
  • Raphael Giveon, Les Bédouins Shosou des documents égyptiens (Leiden: Brill, 1971)monograph
  • Barry G. Webb, The Book of Judges, New International Commentary on the Old Testament (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2012)commentary
  • P. Kyle McCarter, I Samuel, Anchor Bible 8 (Garden City: Doubleday, 1980)commentary
  • Mordechai Cogan and Hayim Tadmor, II Kings, Anchor Bible 11 (Garden City: Doubleday, 1988)commentary
  • Joseph Blenkinsopp, Isaiah 40-55, Anchor Bible 19A (New York: Doubleday, 2002)commentary
  • Jack R. Lundbom, Jeremiah 21-36, Anchor Bible 21B (New York: Doubleday, 2004)commentary
  • William L. Holladay, Jeremiah 2, Hermeneia (Minneapolis: Fortress, 1989)commentary
  • Francis I. Andersen and David Noel Freedman, Hosea, Anchor Bible 24 (Garden City: Doubleday, 1980)commentary
  • Hans Walter Wolff, Hosea, Hermeneia (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1974)commentary
  • Carol L. Meyers and Eric M. Meyers, Zechariah 9-14, Anchor Bible 25C (New York: Doubleday, 1993)commentary

All attested forms of שָׁסַס

qal consecutive-imperfect 3mp

וַיָּשֹׁסּוּ

Jdg 2:14, 1Sa 17:53

niphal consecutive-perfect 3cp

וְנָשַׁסּוּ

Zec 14:2

niphal imperfect 3mp

יִשַּׁסּוּ

Isa 13:16

qal participle m p construct

שֹׁאסַיִ

Jer 30:16

qal perfect 3cp

שַׁסֻּ

Psa 89:41