StrongerBible

re'ut

רְעוּת

HebrewH7469vexation, striving, ...

Appears 7 times · tap a cell to see the verses

Ecc 1:14Ecc 2:11Ecc 2:17Ecc 2:26Ecc 4:4Ecc 4:6Ecc 6:9
Word studyResearch-gradereh-OOTnoun

What re'ut means

a chasing after: the reaching for something that cannot be caught, used only in the Ecclesiastes phrase "a chasing after wind".

TranslatabilityPartialCertaintyContested

This word never stands alone. All seven times it appears, in Ecclesiastes and nowhere else in the Hebrew Bible, it is bound to the word for "wind", and the two together make one phrase: this or that, the writer says, is "a chasing after wind". Wind can be felt and heard, and it can never be gathered into a hand, so the effort spent going after it is the whole point.

Six of the seven are the book's refrain. The writer looks back over a stretch of human effort, the building projects, the pleasure, the wisdom, even the rivalry that drives good work, and closes the account the same way every time: it is vapor, and a chasing after wind. The seventh, Ecclesiastes 4:6, puts the phrase to different work. There it is not a verdict passed afterward but part of what is being weighed, since one handful held quietly is set against two handfuls of toil and chasing after wind.

Ecclesiastes keeps this word in fixed company. הֶבֶל is the vapor word, the judgment that a thing has no substance, and עָמָל is the grinding labor that wears a person down. This word names the third angle, the reaching that set the labor going in the first place. Its masculine partner רַעְיוֹן fills the same wind phrase twice more in the book.

Where the word came from is still argued, and the answer changes the picture. Most scholars now trace it to a family of Aramaic words meaning "to want" or "to will", which fits the fact that the very same word means a king's "pleasure" in the Aramaic parts of Ezra (רְעוּ); on that reading the phrase means the pursuit of wind. An older line derived it instead from the ordinary verb for pasturing a flock (רָעָה), which yields "feeding on wind" or "herding wind", with Hosea 12:1, where Ephraim feeds on wind, as its parallel.

Nuances

1ahalf of the book's standing verdict, "vapor and a chasing after wind": the judgment passed on a stretch of human effort once the account is closed.
Ecc 1:14Ecc 2:11Ecc 2:17Ecc 2:26Ecc 4:4Ecc 6:9
1bpart of what is being measured rather than a verdict on it: the restless chasing that comes attached to the fuller handful.
Ecc 4:6

Disputed

Whether the noun derives from an Aramaic root meaning "to will, to desire", yielding "pursuit of wind", or from the common Hebrew verb "to pasture", yielding "feeding on wind".

  • majorityA word from the Aramaic root for willing and desiring, so the phrase names futile human aspiration rather than a pastoral image.; HALOT, s.v. רְעוּת; BDB, s.v. רְעוּת (root רעה III); Wilhelm Gesenius, Hebräisches und Aramäisches Handwörterbuch über das Alte Testament, 18th ed., ed. Rudolf Meyer, Herbert Donner et al. (Springer, 1987-2010), s.v. רַעְיוֹן; Michael V. Fox, A Time to Tear Down and a Time to Build Up: A Rereading of Ecclesiastes (Eerdmans, 1999), 42-47; Choon-Leong Seow, Ecclesiastes, Anchor Bible 18C (Doubleday, 1997), 121-122; Antoon Schoors, The Preacher Sought to Find Pleasing Words: A Study of the Language of Qoheleth, Part 2, OLA 143 (Peeters, 2004), 439-444
  • minorityA native Hebrew formation from the verb for pasturing, so the phrase pictures feeding on or herding the wind, on the analogy of Hosea 12:1, where Ephraim feeds on wind.; Franz Delitzsch, Commentary on the Song of Songs and Ecclesiastes, trans. M. G. Easton (T. & T. Clark, 1891), on Ecclesiastes 1:14; R. N. Whybray, Ecclesiastes, New Century Bible (Eerdmans, 1989), on Ecclesiastes 1:14; Graham S. Ogden, Qoheleth, 2nd ed., Readings (Sheffield Phoenix, 2007)

Whether רְעוּת in Qohelet is a borrowing from Aramaic or a native Hebrew formation, a question that carries weight for dating the book. It is disputed more evenly than the parallel question about רַעְיוֹן, which is widely conceded to be an Aramaism.

  • contestedAn Aramaism, matching the unambiguous Aramaic רְעוּת of Ezra 5:17 and 7:18 and belonging with the other Aramaic features that place Qohelet in the Persian or early Hellenistic period.; Choon-Leong Seow, "Linguistic Evidence and the Dating of Qohelet", Journal of Biblical Literature 115 (1996): 643-666; Charles F. Whitley, Koheleth: His Language and Thought, BZAW 148 (de Gruyter, 1979); Antoon Schoors, The Preacher Sought to Find Pleasing Words: A Study of the Language of Qoheleth, Part 2, OLA 143 (Peeters, 2004), 439-444; Nili Samet, "Qohelet's Idiolect and Its Cultural Context", Harvard Theological Review 114 (2021)
  • contestedA native Hebrew abstract noun whose form is ordinary Hebrew, so its Aramaic look proves nothing on its own and it carries little weight for dating.; Franz Delitzsch, Commentary on the Song of Songs and Ecclesiastes, trans. M. G. Easton (T. & T. Clark, 1891), on Ecclesiastes 1:14; Robert Gordis, Koheleth: The Man and His World, 3rd ed. (Schocken, 1968), 210-212; Michael V. Fox, A Time to Tear Down and a Time to Build Up: A Rereading of Ecclesiastes (Eerdmans, 1999), 42-47

What scholars say about re'ut

רְעוּת occurs seven times in the Hebrew Bible, all in Qohelet and all bound to רוּחַ (1:14; 2:11; 2:17; 2:26; 4:4; 4:6; 6:9). Six stand in the refrain הֶבֶל וּרְעוּת רוּחַ; only 4:6 varies the frame, coordinating the phrase with עָמָל inside a tov-saying, where commentators divide over whether it belongs to the quoted proverb or is Qohelet's appended verdict. The identical form appears twice in Biblical Aramaic (Ezra 5:17; 7:18, רְעוּת מַלְכָּא, "the pleasure of the king"), where the sense "will, pleasure" is unambiguous; STEPBible files those under the Aramaic lemma רְעוּ. BDB assigns the Qohelet noun to a distinct root רעה III ("striving after, longing, desire"), following Nöldeke's 1900 ZDMG review and explicitly rejecting the derivation from רעה I; HALOT glosses "striving, chasing (after)" and cross-references Aramaic רְעָא "to be pleasing, to will"; DCH (vol. 7) declines to adjudicate etymology and glosses broadly "longing, striving, desire"; Gesenius18 registers the pair as an Aramaismus (Streben, Trachten), reversing the classic Gesenius derivation from רעה I. The ancient versions preserve three routes: LXX προαίρεσις πνεύματος (the Aristotelian term for deliberate choice, via Aramaic "will, purpose"), Aquila νομὴ ἀνέμου and Symmachus βόσκησις ἀνέμου (via רעה I "to pasture"), and Vulgate adflictio spiritus with Peshitta and Targum Qohelet תְּבִירוּת רוּחָא (a rabbinic-Aramaic tradition connecting רעע "to break"), the last being the source of the KJV "vexation of spirit" and endorsed by no modern lexicon. Dafni (Journal for Semitics, 2024) argues that προαίρεσις πνεύματος reflects genuine linguistic understanding rather than a Hellenistic philosophical overlay. Among commentators, Seow (AB 18C, 121-122) glosses "pursuit of wind" and dismisses the Hosea 12:1 parallel as insufficient to save the pastoral derivation; Fox (1999, 42-47) argues from the free construction of the masculine partner רַעְיוֹן with לֵב at 2:22 that the family denotes mental striving; Gordis renders "chasing after wind", Lauha Haschen nach Wind, Krüger (Hermeneia) "striving after wind" as a fixed metaphor for the frustration of the human will, Longman (NICOT) "chasing the wind", and Weeks (ICC) "chasing wind" while cautioning that Qohelet has forged a distinctive idiom whose sense is a technical designation for pointless striving. Whybray and Ogden retain רעה I ("as one who tries to herd wind"); Fredericks construes the genitive subjectively ("the wind's desire"), a reading that has not been followed. The status of רְעוּת specifically is more evenly balanced than that of רַעְיוֹן: Seow, Whitley, Schoors, and Samet class it as Aramaic, while Delitzsch, Gordis, and Fox in his etymological caveats note that the feminine abstract formation is at home in Hebrew. Samet (HTR 2021) further argues that Qohelet's semantics match the Syriac and Christian Palestinian Aramaic senses ("will, deliberation") rather than standard Biblical Aramaic, making the pair an authorial idiolect drawn directly from live Aramaic; DeRouchie's tentative distinction between the two nouns (רַעְיוֹן as cognitive striving, רְעוּת as pursuit-activity) has attracted no broad support. Anderson (JNSL 25 [1999] 59-73) concludes for "pursuit of the unattainable", and Miller (Symbol and Rhetoric in Ecclesiastes, 2002) reads the idiom alongside הֶבֶל as reinforcing the insubstantiality component of Qohelet's central symbol.

Where scholars disagree about re'ut

Whether רְעוּת carries any sense distinct from its masculine partner רַעְיוֹן in Qohelet, or the two are interchangeable stylistic doublets.

  • majorityThe two nouns are functionally synonymous doublets filling one idiom; the choice between them is stylistic, and no separate sense should be posited for either.; Michael V. Fox, A Time to Tear Down and a Time to Build Up: A Rereading of Ecclesiastes (Eerdmans, 1999), 42-47; Choon-Leong Seow, Ecclesiastes, Anchor Bible 18C (Doubleday, 1997), 121-122; Roland E. Murphy, Ecclesiastes, Word Biblical Commentary 23A (Word, 1992); Tremper Longman III, The Book of Ecclesiastes, NICOT (Eerdmans, 1998)
  • minorityThe assimilation of the two is not self-explanatory: in the Aramaic dialects of the period רְעוּת meant "will" while רַעְיוֹן meant "thought", so their fusion in Qohelet requires either an otherwise unattested Aramaic variety or an innovation by the author himself.; Nili Samet, "Qohelet's Idiolect and Its Cultural Context", Harvard Theological Review 114 (2021)
In-depth research

This is a research paper, so it may be hard to read without scholarly background. It is useful if you want to dig even deeper into this word.

Sources

  • HALOT, s.v. רְעוּתlexicon
  • BDB, s.v. רְעוּת (root רעה III)lexicon
  • David J. A. Clines, ed., The Dictionary of Classical Hebrew, vol. 7 (Sheffield Phoenix, 2010), s.v. רְעוּתlexicon
  • Wilhelm Gesenius, Hebräisches und Aramäisches Handwörterbuch über das Alte Testament, 18th ed., ed. Rudolf Meyer, Herbert Donner et al. (Springer, 1987-2010), s.v. רַעְיוֹןlexicon
  • Michael V. Fox, A Time to Tear Down and a Time to Build Up: A Rereading of Ecclesiastes (Eerdmans, 1999), 42-47monograph
  • Choon-Leong Seow, Ecclesiastes, Anchor Bible 18C (Doubleday, 1997), 121-122commentary
  • Choon-Leong Seow, "Linguistic Evidence and the Dating of Qohelet", Journal of Biblical Literature 115 (1996): 643-666article
  • Antoon Schoors, The Preacher Sought to Find Pleasing Words: A Study of the Language of Qoheleth, Part 2, OLA 143 (Peeters, 2004), 439-444monograph
  • Nili Samet, "Qohelet's Idiolect and Its Cultural Context", Harvard Theological Review 114 (2021)article
  • Charles F. Whitley, Koheleth: His Language and Thought, BZAW 148 (de Gruyter, 1979)monograph
  • Robert Gordis, Koheleth: The Man and His World, 3rd ed. (Schocken, 1968), 210-212monograph
  • Franz Delitzsch, Commentary on the Song of Songs and Ecclesiastes, trans. M. G. Easton (T. & T. Clark, 1891)commentary
  • R. N. Whybray, Ecclesiastes, New Century Bible (Eerdmans, 1989)commentary
  • Graham S. Ogden, Qoheleth, 2nd ed., Readings (Sheffield Phoenix, 2007)commentary
  • Thomas Krüger, Qoheleth: A Commentary, Hermeneia (Fortress, 2004)commentary
  • Tremper Longman III, The Book of Ecclesiastes, NICOT (Eerdmans, 1998)commentary
  • Stuart Weeks, Ecclesiastes 1-5, International Critical Commentary (T&T Clark, 2020)commentary
  • W. H. U. Anderson, "The Semantic Implications of הבל and רעות רוח in the Hebrew Bible and for Qoheleth", Journal of Northwest Semitic Languages 25 (1999): 59-73article
  • Douglas B. Miller, Symbol and Rhetoric in Ecclesiastes: The Place of Hebel in Qohelet's Work, Academia Biblica 2 (SBL, 2002)monograph
  • Evangelia G. Dafni, "προαίρεσις πνεύματος im LXX-Ekklesiastes", Journal for Semitics 33 (2024)article

All attested forms of רְעוּת

f s construct

רְעוּת

Ecc 1:14, Ecc 2:11, Ecc 2:17, Ecc 2:26, Ecc 4:4, Ecc 4:6, Ecc 6:9