StrongerBible

tsephu'a

צָפִיעַ

HebrewH6832dung, cow's dung, ...

Appears 1 time · tap a cell to see the verses

Ezk 4:15
Root family
Word studyResearch-gradetsah-FEE-ahnoun

What tsephu'a means

cattle dung: cow droppings, dried and burned as everyday cooking fuel

TranslatabilityApproximateCertaintySettled

This word turns up once in the whole Bible, in Ezekiel 4:15, and it names one thing: the droppings of cattle. Ezekiel has been told to act out the coming siege of Jerusalem by baking his rationed bread over a fire of human waste (גֵּל). As a priest he is appalled, since nothing unclean has ever passed his lips, and God answers by granting him cow dung to burn instead.

Dried dung was ordinary fuel in a land with little firewood, as it still is in much of the world. Patted into flat cakes and dried in the sun, it burns low and steady, which is what a clay oven needs. So the concession is less strange than it sounds today: God is not handing the prophet something exotic but the commonest cooking fire there was. The horror in the sign lay in the human waste, and in what a fire scraped together like that says about a city under siege, where fuel and food alike run out.

Later Jewish writing kept using this word for exactly the same thing, dried cattle dung, and even for rough vessels made of it, which is strong confirmation that the sense is right. Ezekiel's text spells the word with one set of letters while the traditional way of reading it aloud supplies another, but both are the same word, and the old Greek and Latin translations render it plainly as cow dung. What scholars argue over is the word's family: the same letters also spell a Hebrew word for a viper (צִפְעוֹנִי) and a much-debated word in Isaiah usually taken as "offshoots" (צְפִיעָה). Older lexicons tied all of them to one idea of something pushed or squeezed out, while modern ones keep them apart as words that merely look alike.

Ezk 4:15

What scholars say about tsephu'a

The Masoretic text of Ezekiel 4:15 has Ketiv צפועי with Qere צְפִיעֵי in the phrase צְפִיעֵי הַבָּקָר, set opposite גֶּלְלֵי הָאָדָם; BDB, following Cornill and Toy, treats the Qere as primary, and both spellings stand for one noun. BDB files the word under a root it labels II. צפע, comparing an Arabic verb meaning "to defecate" and an Ethiopic noun for excrement. Gesenius, in the Tregelles translation, goes further and derives the Isaiah 22:24 hapax צְפִיעָה from the same root, glossing it as shoots of little value, "as if excrements." The modern critical lexica are more restrained: HALOT and DCH give the Ezekiel word the plain sense "dung, cattle dung" and treat the Isaiah form as a contextual inference rather than a secure derivation, DCH omitting cognate material by editorial policy. The versions are unanimous and transparent: LXX βόλβιτα βοῶν, Vulgate fimum boum. The strongest support for the sense is post-biblical. Mishnaic Hebrew and Jewish Aramaic use צְפִיעֵי בָּקָר as a live term for dried cattle dung and dung cakes, glossing גְּלָלִים and even naming crude vessels made of dried dung (so Jastrow, and Ben-Yehuda, who collects Rabbenu Hananel on Bava Metzia 27a, Rashi on Eruvin 29b, Meiri on Yoma 2a, and the Arukh). Microarchaeology corroborates the practice behind the word: infrared analysis of Iron Age cooking installations at Tell es-Safi/Gath and comparable sites identifies dung spherulites alongside phytoliths from dung and crop-processing fuel in tannur and tabun ovens (Gur-Arieh et al., Journal of Archaeological Science 46 [2014]: 50-67). Commentators on Ezekiel 4:9-17 accordingly locate the scandal of the sign act in the human excrement of 4:12 and in the deprivation of siege rations, not in dung fuel as such.

Where scholars disagree about tsephu'a

Whether the word for cattle dung belongs to a single Hebrew root that also underlies the word for a viper and the disputed word in Isaiah 22:24, or is a separate word that merely shares the same consonants.

  • majoritySeparate words that happen to be spelled alike. The cattle-dung word stands on its own comparative and later Hebrew evidence, while a unifying derivation cannot be demonstrated and the sense of the Isaiah form is inferred from its context.; HALOT, s.v. צָפִיעַ; D. J. A. Clines (ed.), The Dictionary of Classical Hebrew (DCH), vol. VII; BDB, root II. צפע (filed apart from the viper word, with the Isaiah sense marked dubious)
  • minorityOne root carrying the idea of something issuing or pushing forth, which yields the viper, excrement, and the shoots of little value in Isaiah 22:24 as branches of a single word family.; W. Gesenius (trans. S. P. Tregelles), Hebrew and Chaldee Lexicon to the Old Testament, s.v. צְפִיעָה
In-depth research

This is a research paper, so it may be hard to read without scholarly background. It is useful if you want to dig even deeper into this word.

Sources

  • HALOT, s.v. צָפִיעַlexicon
  • BDB, s.v. צָפִיעַ, and root II. צפעlexicon
  • D. J. A. Clines (ed.), The Dictionary of Classical Hebrew (DCH), vol. VII, s.v. צָפִיעַlexicon
  • W. Gesenius (trans. S. P. Tregelles), Hebrew and Chaldee Lexicon to the Old Testament, s.v. צְפִיעָהlexicon
  • M. Jastrow, A Dictionary of the Targumim, the Talmud Babli and Yerushalmi, and the Midrashic Literature, s.v. צְפִיעַlexicon
  • E. Ben-Yehuda, Thesaurus of the Hebrew Language, s.v. צָפִיעַlexicon
  • W. Zimmerli, Ezekiel 1 (Hermeneia), on Ezekiel 4:9-17commentary
  • D. I. Block, The Book of Ezekiel: Chapters 1-24 (NICOT), on Ezekiel 4:9-17commentary
  • S. Gur-Arieh, R. Shahack-Gross, A. M. Maeir, G. Lehmann, L. A. Hitchcock, and E. Boaretto, "The taphonomy and preservation of wood and dung ashes found in archaeological cooking installations: case studies from Iron Age Israel," Journal of Archaeological Science 46 (2014): 50-67article

All attested forms of צָפִיעַ

m p construct

צְפִיעֵי

Ezk 4:15