StrongerBible

tsephi'ah

צְפִיעָה

HebrewH6849offshoots, issue, ...

Appears 1 time · tap a cell to see the verses

Isa 22:24
Root family
Word studyResearch-gradetseh-fee-AHnoun

What tsephi'ah means

offshoots: the lesser branches of a family, the further relatives and dependents who hang on the head of a great house

TranslatabilityPartialCertaintyObscure

This word appears once in the whole Bible, in Isaiah 22:24, and never again in Hebrew after it. Isaiah has just promised that Eliakim will be driven into place like a tent peg in a firm wall, and that the whole weight and honor of his father's house will be hung on him: the offspring (צֶאֱצָא) and these offshoots, right down to every small vessel, from the bowls to the jars. Because there is no second verse to compare, the sense has to be worked out from the company the word keeps.

The strongest clue is the word standing next to it. "Offspring" names those who come directly from a man, so this second word most likely names the further branches: the lesser relatives, the in-laws and hangers-on, everyone further out on the family tree who lives off the family name. Ancient and medieval readers took it that way. The Aramaic translation of Isaiah spoke of sons and grandsons, and Jewish commentators in the Middle Ages glossed the pair as "sons and daughters."

Scholars still read the word three ways:

  • most take it as a second word for kin, the side branches of a household, lesser than the direct offspring named beside it;
  • a smaller group hears contempt in it, the worthless growths a family throws off, so that the honor heaped on Eliakim is already a warning;
  • others tie it to the vessels in the rest of the verse, reading it as a kind of pot or a swelling rather than a person, and some of them think the last two verses of the chapter were added later as a piece of irony.

The picture matters more than the label. Whatever exactly is hanging there, the next verse says the peg gives way and everything on it falls. Loading one man with a whole clan's weight is not a compliment: it is the setup for a crash. The same three letters also spell the Hebrew word for cattle dung (צָפִיעַ) and, in a longer form, a word for a viper (צִפְעוֹנִי). Older lexicons filed all of them under one idea of something pushed or squeezed out, while modern ones keep them apart as words that merely look alike.

Isa 22:24

Disputed

What the plural noun in Isaiah 22:24 actually names: a second class of relatives, a term of contempt for worthless growths, or something belonging with the vessels listed in the rest of the verse.

  • majorityOffshoots, that is, a second word for kin, slightly lesser than the offspring named beside it. The sense is inferred from that parallel rather than from any secure derivation, and this is the reading behind the standard English versions.; BDB, s.v. צְפִיעָה ("dubious; apparently, from context, offshoot"); D. J. A. Clines (ed.), The Dictionary of Classical Hebrew (DCH), vol. VII, s.v. צְפִיעָה; G. S. Ogden and J. Sterk, A Handbook on Isaiah (UBS Helps for Translators), on Isaiah 22:24
  • minorityShoots of little value, named as if they were what a family excretes, so the word carries contempt for the lesser dependents even while the oracle piles honor on Eliakim.; W. Gesenius (trans. S. P. Tregelles), Hebrew and Chaldee Lexicon to the Old Testament, s.v. צְפִיעָה
  • minorityA term belonging with the small vessels, bowls and jars of the second half of the verse rather than with people, a reading often joined to the view that Isaiah 22:24 and 22:25 are a later ironic supplement to the oracle. Held by some critical commentators on Isaiah without a settled lexical proposal behind it.

What scholars say about tsephi'ah

הַצְּפִעוֹת in Isaiah 22:24 is a hapax attested only in the plural, and the lexica differ over both its derivation and its sense. Gesenius, in the Tregelles translation, glosses צְפִיעָה as shoots of a tree of little value, "as if excrements," used figuratively of less distinguished offspring in contrast to הַצֶּאֱצָאִים, and files it under the root צָפַע that also yields the word for cattle dung in Ezekiel 4:15. BDB is more guarded, printing the noun as dubious and glossing it "apparently, from context, offshoot," while attaching it loosely to the root it labels II. צפע (compared with an Arabic verb for defecating and an Ethiopic noun for excrement). The modern critical lexica are more restrained still: HALOT gives a contextual gloss along the lines of offshoot or that which sprouts, attested only in the plural, and DCH, which omits cognate data by editorial policy, glosses simply "offshoot, shoot." No securely attested cognate verb yields the sense "sprout" for צפע, so the meaning rests on the internal parallelism with צֶאֱצָאִים (from יצא, "to go out") rather than on comparative Semitic evidence. The versions register the difficulty rather than resolving it: the Septuagint declines a word for word rendering of הַצֶּאֱצָאִים וְהַצְּפִעוֹת and paraphrases with ἀπὸ μικροῦ ἕως μεγάλου, catching the gist of a range of dependents from lesser to greater, while Targum Jonathan and the medieval exegetes (Kimchi, Ibn Ezra) render with terms for descendants, an interpretive convergence that is contextual rather than lexical. Text critically the term is stable: 1QIsaa is complete for the chapter, 1QIsab preserves part of vv. 24 to 25, 4Q55 preserves vv. 13 to 25 and 4Q56 vv. 24 to 25, with no significant variant, so the crux is lexical and semantic rather than text critical. Ogden and Sterk state the position plainly in the UBS Handbook on Isaiah: the word is found only in this verse and is of unknown origin, so its meaning has to be determined from this context. Critical commentary on the Eliakim oracle (Isaiah 22:15 to 25) divides accordingly, many treating vv. 24 to 25 as a later ironic supplement in which the imagery of vessels hung on a peg is primary over any genealogical sense.

Where scholars disagree about tsephi'ah

Whether this word belongs to a single Hebrew root that also underlies the word for cattle dung and the word for a viper, or is a separate word that merely shares the same consonants.

  • majoritySeparate words that happen to be spelled alike. The cattle dung word stands on its own comparative and later Hebrew evidence, no unifying derivation can be demonstrated, and the sense of the Isaiah form is inferred from its context.; HALOT, s.v. צְפִיעָה; D. J. A. Clines (ed.), The Dictionary of Classical Hebrew (DCH), vol. VII; BDB, root II. צפע (filed apart from the viper word, with the Isaiah sense marked dubious)
  • minorityOne root carrying the idea of something issuing or pushing forth, which yields the viper, excrement, and the shoots of little value in Isaiah 22:24 as branches of a single word family.; W. Gesenius (trans. S. P. Tregelles), Hebrew and Chaldee Lexicon to the Old Testament, s.v. צְפִיעָה
In-depth research

This is a research paper, so it may be hard to read without scholarly background. It is useful if you want to dig even deeper into this word.

Sources

  • BDB, s.v. צְפִיעָה, and root II. צפעlexicon
  • W. Gesenius (trans. S. P. Tregelles), Hebrew and Chaldee Lexicon to the Old Testament, s.v. צְפִיעָהlexicon
  • HALOT, s.v. צְפִיעָהlexicon
  • D. J. A. Clines (ed.), The Dictionary of Classical Hebrew (DCH), vol. VII, s.v. צְפִיעָהlexicon
  • G. S. Ogden and J. Sterk, A Handbook on Isaiah (UBS Helps for Translators, New York: United Bible Societies, 2011), on Isaiah 22:24commentary
  • H. Wildberger, Isaiah 13-27 (Continental Commentaries), on Isaiah 22:15-25commentary
  • J. Blenkinsopp, Isaiah 1-39 (Anchor Bible), on Isaiah 22:15-25commentary

All attested forms of צְפִיעָה

f p absolute

צְּפִעוֹת

Isa 22:24