StrongerBible

skubalon

σκύβαλον

GreekG4657dung, rubbish, ...

Appears 1 time · tap a cell to see the verses

Php 3:8
Compound of
Word studyResearch-gradeSKOO-bah-lonnoun

What skubalon means

what gets thrown out: the worthless leftovers swept away once the useful part has been taken

TranslatabilityPartialCertaintyStrong

This word names the discarded remainder: the siftings left in a sieve, the chaff after winnowing, the dregs in a cup, the scraps cleared from a table, the filth washed through a street, and (especially in ancient doctors' writing) the body's waste. The single thread running through all of it is the same: this is what is left over after the good part has been pulled out, and it is now fit only to be carted off.

Paul uses it once, at the climax of Philippians 3. He has just listed his most prized credentials, the things that made him a model of Jewish piety, and then he stacks up an accounting image that keeps getting starker: he counts them as loss, says he has lost them all, and finally calls them this. The point is the reversal of value. Set beside knowing Christ, even his finest religious assets are the residue that gets swept off the threshing floor.

Much ink has been spilled over how crude the word is. It clearly carries disgust, because the things it points to are often disgusting. But it was also the polite, ordinary word that physicians and historians and even wisdom writers used, and a handful of real men were named with it, so it is forceful and vivid rather than a true swear word. English Bibles land all over the map for exactly this reason: dung, refuse, rubbish, garbage, filth.

Php 3:8

What scholars say about skubalon

σκύβαλον is a New Testament hapax at Phil 3:8 with a wide but coherent referential range: agricultural siftings and chaff, dregs and leftovers, street and sweepings refuse, and bodily excrement (the last especially frequent in medical writers). The unifying notion is the discarded residue left once the useful portion is removed; the cognate verb σκυβαλίζω ("treat as refuse, despise") is conventional Hellenistic moralizing idiom. Lexica agree on the range but split on register: Louw-Nida (6.225) glosses neutrally ("rubbish, refuse, garbage"); TDNT (Lang 7:445-47) and Spicq (TLNT 3:263-65) press "dung" and crudity, the latter cited by BDAG; NIDNTTE (Silva) settles on "dung" short of obscenity; LSJ gives "dung, refuse, offal." The decisive distributional point is that roughly half of all attested occurrences are in dignified medical prose (Hippocratic Corpus, Galen, Soranus, Aretaeus, Aetius), where it is the decorous clinical term for stool alongside περίττωμα, never the genuinely crude χέζω/σκατός/βδέω; it also appears in formal historiography (Josephus BJ 5.571, Strabo 14.1.37), wisdom literature (Sir 27:4, paralleled with κοπρία), elite allegory (Philo), and as a personal name (Σκύβαλος) for at least a dozen documented men, which is incompatible with English-shit-level taboo. The Byzantine "thrown to the dogs" etymology (Suda, Etym. Magnum), used by Lightfoot to invert the κύνες of 3:2, is folk etymology; Beekes classes the word as Pre-Greek substrate and Chantraine and Frisk leave the origin unexplained. Rhetorically the word climaxes an accounting crescendo (κέρδος, ζημία, σκύβαλα). The consensus synthesis (Aubrey, Manning, Colvin, Hellerman against the strong-register reading of Wallace, Spicq, Reumann, Silva, O'Brien) is that the term is strong but not obscene: forceful and disgust-laden in its referents, yet lexically respectable.

Where scholars disagree about skubalon

How vulgar or offensive σκύβαλον is. The referential meaning (discarded refuse, including excrement) is not in serious doubt; the live question is its register, that is, whether it approaches the force of an English obscenity in Phil 3:8.

  • majorityStrong but not taboo: forceful and disgust-laden because its referents are disgusting, yet a lexically respectable word, given its heavy use in dignified medical, historiographical, and wisdom prose and its attestation as a personal name. Best English glosses sit in the broad middle (dung, filth, refuse).; M. Aubrey, "Obscenity in Paul? The Question of σκύβαλον" (2018); J. H. Hellerman, Philippians, EGGNT (2015), 174-75; G. D. Fee, Paul's Letter to the Philippians, NICNT (1995), 319
  • minorityCoarse and emotionally charged, at or near the strong end of English vulgarity; "dung" or even "crap" best captures both worthlessness and revulsion, and "rubbish" undersells it.; D. B. Wallace, "A Brief Word Study on Σκύβαλον" (2003); C. Spicq, Theological Lexicon of the New Testament 3:263-65; M. Silva, Philippians, BECNT, 2nd ed. (2005), 180
In-depth research

This is a research paper, so it may be hard to read without scholarly background. It is useful if you want to dig even deeper into this word.

Sources

  • BDAG, s.v. σκύβαλονlexicon
  • LSJ, s.v. σκύβαλονlexicon
  • F. Lang, TDNT 7:445-47, s.v. σκύβαλονdictionary
  • C. Spicq, Theological Lexicon of the New Testament 3:263-65dictionary
  • M. Silva, Philippians, BECNT, 2nd ed. (2005), 180commentary
  • P. T. O'Brien, The Epistle to the Philippians, NIGTC (1991), 390commentary
  • G. D. Fee, Paul's Letter to the Philippians, NICNT (1995), 319commentary
  • J. H. Hellerman, Philippians, EGGNT (2015), 174-75commentary
  • D. B. Wallace, "A Brief Word Study on Σκύβαλον," in New Testament Greek and Exegesis (Eerdmans, 2003)article
  • J. D. Punch, "Σκύβαλα Happens," The Bible Translator 65/3 (2014): 369-384article
  • R. S. P. Beekes, Etymological Dictionary of Greek (2010), s.v. σκύβαλονlexicon

All attested forms of σκύβαλον

accusative n p

σκύβαλα

Php 3:8