StrongerBible

naval

נָבָל

HebrewH5036fool, scoundrel

Appears 18 times · tap a cell to see the verses

Deu 32:6Deu 32:212Sa 3:332Sa 13:13Job 2:10Job 30:8Psa 14:1Psa 39:8(9)Psa 53:1(2)Psa 74:18Psa 74:22Pro 17:7Pro 17:21Pro 30:22Ezk 13:3
Root family
Names & words formed with this
Word studyResearch-gradenaw-VAWLadjective

What naval means

the sacrilegious scoundrel: one whose conduct ruptures the covenantal and communal order, not a person of low intelligence

TranslatabilityUntranslatableCertaintyStrong

This word does not mean "fool" in the ordinary English sense of someone unintelligent or unwise. Scholarship since W. M. W. Roth (1960) and Anthony Phillips (1975) has established that it designates a person who, by his actions, treats the sacral and communal order of Israel as if it did not bind him. He is morally and religiously bankrupt in a way that shatters community:

  • the practical atheist of Psalm 14 who by his conduct says there is no God to reckon with
  • the churlish host of 1 Samuel 25 who refuses hospitality and repays loyal service with contempt
  • the outrageous violator of Deuteronomy 32 who has repaid his covenant God with corruption

The word spans narrative, legal, prophetic, and psalmic texts and consistently names conduct that must not be done in Israel. Isaiah 32:5-6 provides the most concentrated definition: the fool speaks folly, plots iniquity, practices ungodliness, speaks error concerning YHWH, and leaves the hungry empty. These are not separate things but one portrait: the person whose practical rejection of God expresses itself in cruelty, dishonesty, and violation of hospitality and covenant. The abstract noun that pairs with it, translated "outrage" or "disgraceful folly," appears in the fixed legal formula ("an outrage in Israel, which ought not to be done") at the most serious crimes in the canon: Shechem's rape of Dinah, Achan's sacrilege, the Gibeah atrocity, and Amnon's assault of Tamar.

The word is rare in Proverbs, where wisdom-school vocabulary dominates, and frequent in narrative, legal, and prophetic texts. It does not belong in the same taxonomic category as the other Hebrew words for fool (כסיל, the morally perverse knave (אויל), the gullible youth, the hardened scoffer). Those terms describe deficient relations to wisdom; this word describes a transgressor of the sacral-communal order whose fate is typically death or excision from the community. The LXX's near-mechanical rendering as "aphron (ἄφρων)" (mindless) unfortunately collapsed this specific social-religious register into generic intellectual folly, a reductiveness that has distorted later translations.

Deu 32:6Deu 32:21Job 2:10Job 30:8Psa 14:1Psa 39:8(9)Psa 53:1(2)Psa 74:18Psa 74:22Pro 17:7Pro 17:21Pro 30:22

What scholars say about naval

The decisive scholarly contribution came from W. M. W. Roth ("NBL," VT 10, 1960) and Anthony Phillips ("NEBALAH," VT 25, 1975), who established that this word designates a person whose conduct ruptures the sacral-communal order of Israel, not a person of low intelligence. Roth analyzed every occurrence and concluded that the person named is socially, morally, and religiously "out of place," an outcast by reason of his own sacrilegious conduct. Phillips refined this as primarily a juridical-covenantal category: the abstract noun for outrage functions as a technical term in a legal formula ("an outrage in Israel, which ought not to be done") at the most serious crimes in the canon. The TDOT article by Johannes Marböck treats the word as substantively continuous with the related verbal root meaning "wither/droop," reading the scoundrel as one whose moral-religious vitality has withered. Michael V. Fox's taxonomy of Hebrew "fool" vocabulary in his Anchor Yale Proverbs commentary does not include this word in the wisdom-school group at all, confirming its distinct register. Commentaries on Deuteronomy (Tigay, Block), Joshua (Butler, Hess), Judges (Block, Webb), and Samuel (McCarter, Alter, Tsumura) all presuppose Phillips's juridical-covenantal reading as the standard. The principal internal debate is whether the term is primarily sociological-honor-shame (Roth, Bechtel, Olyan) or strictly legal-covenantal (Phillips, Pressler, Tigay); current scholarship holds both dimensions are present.

Where scholars disagree about naval

Whether the word's meaning is primarily sociological-honor-shame (the scoundrel as social outcast whose disgrace shames the community) or primarily legal-covenantal (the perpetrator of an act categorized as a capital covenant violation).

  • minorityThe term is fundamentally sociological and honor-shame in its logic: the fool-scoundrel is defined by his social marginality and the disgrace he brings on himself and the community, and the juridical formula is one expression of this broader social-religious category.; W. M. W. Roth, 'NBL,' VT 10 (1960): 394-409; Saul M. Olyan, 'Honor, Shame, and Covenant Relations in Ancient Israel,' JBL 115 (1996): 201-218
  • minorityThe term is primarily a juridical-covenantal category: the abstract noun "outrage" is a technical legal term for conduct constituting a fundamental breach of Israel's covenantal order, punishable by death or excision, and the wisdom-literature uses are secondary metaphorical extensions.; Anthony Phillips, 'NEBALAH,' VT 25 (1975): 237-242; Carolyn Pressler, The View of Women Found in the Deuteronomic Family Laws (Berlin: de Gruyter, 1993)
  • majorityBoth dimensions are present and inseparable: the term is legal-covenantal at its core, with strong social-anthropological resonance, and neither aspect should be privileged over the other.; J. Marböck, TDOT IX (1998): 157-171; Jeffrey H. Tigay, Deuteronomy (JPS, 1996)
In-depth research

This is a research paper, so it may be hard to read without scholarly background. It is useful if you want to dig even deeper into this word.

Sources

  • W. M. W. Roth, 'NBL,' Vetus Testamentum 10 (1960): 394-409journal
  • Anthony Phillips, 'NEBALAH -- A Term for Serious Disorderly and Unruly Conduct,' Vetus Testamentum 25 (1975): 237-242journal
  • J. Marböck, 'nabal; nebalah,' TDOT vol. IX (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1998), 157-171dictionary
  • H.-P. Müller, 'nabal,' TLOT vol. II (Munich: Kaiser, 1976), 26-31dictionary
  • BDB, s.vv. nabal, nebalahlexicon
  • HALOT II, s.v. nabal II, 663-664lexicon
  • DCH V, s.v. nabal II, 586-595lexicon
  • Michael V. Fox, Proverbs 1-9 (AYB 18A; New Haven: Yale UP, 2000), 'Words for Folly,' 38-43commentary
  • Bruce K. Waltke, art. 'nabal,' TWOT (Chicago: Moody, 1980)dictionary
  • Jeffrey H. Tigay, Deuteronomy (JPS Torah Commentary; Philadelphia: JPS, 1996)commentary
  • P. Kyle McCarter, I Samuel (AB 8; Garden City: Doubleday, 1980)commentary
  • Jon D. Levenson, '1 Samuel 25 as Literature and as History,' CBQ 40 (1978): 11-28journal
  • Hans-Joachim Kraus, Psalms 1-59 (Minneapolis: Fortress, 1993)commentary
  • Hans Wildberger, Isaiah 28-39 (Minneapolis: Fortress, 2002)commentary

All attested forms of נָבָל

m s absolute

נָבָל

Deu 32:6, Deu 32:21, 2Sa 3:33, Job 30:8, Psa 14:1, Psa 39:8, Psa 53:1, Psa 74:18

m p absolute

נְּבָלִים

2Sa 13:13, Ezk 13:3

f p absolute

נְּבָלוֹת

Job 2:10