StrongerBible

na

נָא

HebrewH4994please, now, ...

Appears 404 times · tap a cell to see the verses

Gen 12:11Gen 12:13Gen 13:8Gen 13:9Gen 13:14Gen 15:5Gen 16:2 (2×)Gen 18:3 (2×)Gen 18:4Gen 18:21Gen 18:27Gen 19:2Gen 19:8Gen 19:20Gen 24:42Gen 27:21Gen 27:26Gen 32:29(30)Gen 33:15Gen 37:16Gen 38:16Gen 40:14
Names & words formed with this
Word studyResearch-gradenahparticle

What na means

a short word tacked onto a command, wish, or proposal that marks it as something put to the hearer rather than simply imposed

TranslatabilityUntranslatableCertaintyContested

This little word turns up about four hundred times, and nearly always inside recorded speech: someone asking, ordering, proposing, or provoking. It never stands on its own. It leans on the word right in front of it, usually a command, and Hebrew normally joins the two with a short connecting stroke so that they are read as a single unit. Genesis alone accounts for roughly a fifth of all its appearances, while Deuteronomy, which is mostly one long address rather than conversation, has only two.

English Bibles handle it in every possible way. Older versions print "I pray thee"; newer ones write "please" or "now"; and very often a translation simply leaves it out, because English has nothing that behaves the way it does. Scholars have not settled the matter either, and the disagreement runs deep enough that the standard dictionaries define it differently from one another. Hebrew does have a heavier word for roughly the same job, the outright cry of appeal (אָנָּא), which can stand alone and which often shows up alongside this one in prayer.

What the uses seem to share is that the speaker is putting something forward for the hearer to take up, rather than merely stating it. That one idea stretches surprisingly far:

  • A person with no leverage begs a favor, and the word softens a demand into a request.
  • A father, a king, or God himself gives an order, and the word draws the hearer into it rather than pleading.
  • A speaker proposes his own next move, as in "let me turn aside and see," inviting the other person to agree.
  • A speaker asks that something happen to somebody else, as in "let a little water be brought."
  • A mocker dares an opponent to try what he cannot do, and the same word turns a command into a jeer.

About thirty times it attaches not to a command at all but to the small word that opens an appeal, most often the word that points something out (הִנֵּה), producing the familiar "see now" that begins so many speeches. Because the word itself is so light, its force comes almost entirely from the sentence around it. The same two letters carry a servant's deference to his master and a prophet's contempt for Babylon's astrologers.

When the ancient Greek translators of the Old Testament rendered it at all, they reached for δή, roughly "then, now," or for words meaning "therefore," and often they printed nothing. One phrase escaped translation altogether: the cry "save now" in Psalm 118:25 was carried over sound for sound into Greek as ὡσαννά, and reaches English as "hosanna," which is this very word riding on the end of a plea for rescue.

Nuances

1aplease: softening a request the speaker has no power to enforce, whether asked of another person or of God
TranslatabilityApproximate
Gen 12:13Gen 24:17Gen 24:23Gen 30:14Gen 33:11Gen 37:16Gen 50:17Jdg 4:19Jdg 16:6Jdg 16:101Sa 25:82Ki 4:22
1battached to an order from someone who could simply command, drawing the hearer into it rather than pleading
Gen 13:14Gen 15:5Gen 22:2Gen 24:2Gen 27:3Gen 37:141Sa 16:17Job 38:3Job 40:7Isa 1:18Isa 7:3Jer 5:1
Gen 22:2

What the particle contributes to God's command in Genesis 22:2. The verse is the standard test case for every general account of the particle, because a straightforward politeness reading would turn the command into a request.

  • contestedIt is the ordinary request marker here as elsewhere, so a rendering with "please" is defensible even on God's lips; the particle redresses a command that would otherwise be issued bare.; Stephen A. Kaufman, "An Emphatic Plea for Please," Maarav 7 (1991): 195-198; Timothy D. Wilt, "A Sociolinguistic Analysis of NĀʾ," Vetus Testamentum 46/2 (1996): 237-255
  • minorityIt marks the command as following from the situation just narrated, so the force is "then take your son" rather than "please take your son." Lambdin cites this verse as evidence that a politeness reading cannot be general.; Thomas O. Lambdin, Introduction to Biblical Hebrew (New York: Scribner's, 1971), §136; Steven E. Fassberg, Studies in Biblical Syntax (Jerusalem: Magnes, 1994), 44-47
  • minorityIt presents the command as a proposal placed before Abraham's will, however inescapable the outcome, which is what a propositive marker does.; Bent Christiansen, "A Linguistic Analysis of the Biblical Hebrew Particle nāʾ: A Test Case," Vetus Testamentum 59/3 (2009): 379-393
1clet me, let us: attached to the speaker's proposal about his own next move, inviting the hearer to go along with it
Gen 18:21Exo 3:3Exo 3:18Num 20:17Deu 3:25Jdg 14:12Rut 2:22Sa 18:192Sa 24:141Ki 19:202Ki 6:2Sng 3:2
1dlet him, let it be: attached to a wish about somebody else or about an outcome, asked of the person who can grant it
Gen 26:28Jdg 15:21Sa 25:242Sa 19:372Sa 24:171Ki 17:211Ki 20:322Ki 2:92Ki 7:13Neh 1:6Psa 119:76Sng 7:8
1eplease do not: softening a plea that somebody hold back from doing something
TranslatabilityApproximate
Gen 13:8Gen 18:30Gen 18:32Gen 19:7Gen 19:18Num 10:31Num 12:11Num 12:12Num 22:16Jdg 6:181Sa 3:171Sa 25:25
1fattached to the small word that opens an appeal, framing the whole speech that follows: "see now," "if you please," "oh now"
Gen 12:11Gen 18:27Gen 18:31Gen 27:2Gen 30:27Jdg 6:17Jdg 13:31Sa 9:61Sa 16:151Sa 27:52Sa 14:212Ki 2:19
1gin a taunt, dare, or ironic challenge, where the polite reading collapses and the word sharpens a jeer
Jdg 9:382Ki 18:23Job 1:11Job 2:5Job 40:10Psa 115:2Isa 19:12Isa 36:8Isa 47:12Isa 47:13Jer 17:15Mal 1:8

What scholars say about na

Four analyses of נָא currently contend and none commands consensus. The traditional entreaty reading is codified in BDB 609 ("particle of entreaty or exhortation, I (we) pray, now (enclitic)"), simplified to "please" in DCH 5.576, and defended against Lambdin by Kaufman (Maarav 7 [1991]: 195-198), whose argument is that the Central-Semitic energic *-anna from which the particle likely derives is misnamed emphatic and is in fact petitionary and softening. Wilt (VT 46 [1996]: 237-255) applied the Brown and Levinson politeness model to the J and E material of Genesis through Numbers and concluded that "please" would suit most occurrences, while conceding awkward data: Yhwh uses the particle toward humans in about a tenth of the divine-human exchanges he counted, and heads of household use it downward toward domestic inferiors. Shulman (Hebrew Studies 40 [1999]: 57-82) retains politeness as the functional category but argues syntactically rather than through politeness theory, distinguishing the particle's effect on the imperative (152 occurrences in Torah and Former Prophets prose, distributed 70 superior to inferior, 46 between equals, 36 inferior to superior), on the cohortative (a proposal contingent on the addressee's cooperation), and on the third-person jussive (a request directed to the hearer as agent, contrast Genesis 1:3 with Genesis 18:4). Lambdin (Introduction to Biblical Hebrew, 1971, §136) argued instead that the particle marks the command as a logical consequence of the preceding statement or of the situation of utterance, a reading Fassberg (Studies in Biblical Syntax, 1994, 44-47) supports from the convergence of the ancient versions: the Septuagint gives δή, οὖν, νῦν or nothing at all, the Targumim give כְּעַן "now", the Peshitta gives "now" or omits, and only the Vulgate consistently reads obsecro or quaeso, plausibly under rabbinic influence. HALOT 656, Gesenius (18th ed.) 4:767, and Muraoka (Emphatic Words and Structures in Biblical Hebrew, 1985, ch. VII) rank the semantic core as emphatic or affective with entreaty as one contextual coloring; Joüon-Muraoka §105c calls it an emotive particle restricted to intimate or familiar speech. Christiansen (VT 59 [2009]: 379-393) reclassifies it as a propositive particle marking an action the addressee may or may not accommodate, and makes the recursive stacking of הִנֵּה־נָּא followed by סוּרוּ־נָא in Genesis 19:2 central to the analysis. Jenni (VTSup 92, 2002, 1-16) treats it as a modal softener best rendered by German doch. The etymology is uncertain in every serious lexicon: there is no free lexical cognate in Akkadian, Ugaritic, or Aramaic, and the reigning working hypothesis is a reanalysis of the Central-Semitic energic ending reconstructed by Huehnergard and studied by Rainey and Moran in Amarna Canaanite yaqtulanna, with the intermediate steps unattested and the attachment to non-verbal hosts (הִנֵּה־נָא, אַל־נָא, אִם־נָא) unexplained. Diachronically the particle peaks in Standard Biblical Hebrew dialogue, thins in Chronicles and Ezra-Nehemiah where it survives chiefly in archaizing prayer, and is effectively dead in Qumran and Mishnaic Hebrew, its function taken over by the Aramaic loans בְּבָעוּ and בְּמָטוּתָא and later by בְּבַקָּשָׁה.

Where scholars disagree about na

What the particle actually means. Four analyses contend and none commands consensus, and the standard reference works are themselves split: BDB and DCH gloss it "please," HALOT and Gesenius (18th ed.) classify it as emphatic, and Joüon-Muraoka call it emotive or affective.

  • contestedIt marks a request. The particle is a politeness or entreaty marker, and "please" is an appropriate rendering in most or all occurrences.; BDB, A Hebrew and English Lexicon of the Old Testament, 609, s.v. נָא; David J. A. Clines, ed., The Dictionary of Classical Hebrew, 5.576; Stephen A. Kaufman, "An Emphatic Plea for Please," Maarav 7 (1991): 195-198; Timothy D. Wilt, "A Sociolinguistic Analysis of NĀʾ," Vetus Testamentum 46/2 (1996): 237-255; Ahouva Shulman, "The Particle נָא in Biblical Hebrew Prose," Hebrew Studies 40 (1999): 57-82
  • minorityIt marks logical consequence. The particle signals that the command follows from an immediately preceding statement or from the situation of utterance, so "then, therefore, now" fits better than "please." The convergence of the ancient versions on inferential and temporal renderings is the main external support.; Thomas O. Lambdin, Introduction to Biblical Hebrew (New York: Scribner's, 1971), §136; Steven E. Fassberg, Studies in Biblical Syntax (Jerusalem: Magnes, 1994), 44-47; Bruce K. Waltke and M. O'Connor, An Introduction to Biblical Hebrew Syntax (Eisenbrauns, 1990), §34.7a
  • contestedIt is an emphatic or affective particle, one of the emphatic words of Biblical Hebrew, and entreaty is only one of its contextual colorings rather than its lexical meaning.; Koehler, Baumgartner, Stamm, HALOT, 656, s.v. נא; Gesenius, Hebräisches und Aramäisches Handwörterbuch, 18th ed., 4:767; Takamitsu Muraoka, Emphatic Words and Structures in Biblical Hebrew (Magnes / Brill, 1985), ch. VII; Paul Joüon and Takamitsu Muraoka, A Grammar of Biblical Hebrew, rev. Eng. ed. (2006), §105c
  • minorityIt is a propositive marker: a sentence-level modal particle signaling that the speaker is proposing an action with which the addressee may or may not agree or choose to accommodate.; Bent Christiansen, "A Linguistic Analysis of the Biblical Hebrew Particle nāʾ: A Test Case," Vetus Testamentum 59/3 (2009): 379-393
In-depth research

This is a research paper, so it may be hard to read without scholarly background. It is useful if you want to dig even deeper into this word.

Sources

  • BDB, A Hebrew and English Lexicon of the Old Testament (Oxford, 1906), 609, s.v. נָאlexicon
  • Koehler, Baumgartner, Stamm, HALOT, 656, s.v. נאlexicon
  • David J. A. Clines, ed., The Dictionary of Classical Hebrew, 5.576, s.v. נאlexicon
  • Gesenius, Hebräisches und Aramäisches Handwörterbuch über das Alte Testament, 18th ed. (De Gruyter, 1987-2012), 4:767lexicon
  • Thomas O. Lambdin, Introduction to Biblical Hebrew (New York: Scribner's, 1971), §136, 170-171grammar
  • Paul Joüon and Takamitsu Muraoka, A Grammar of Biblical Hebrew, rev. Eng. ed. (Rome: Pontifical Biblical Institute, 2006), §105c, §114bgrammar
  • Bruce K. Waltke and M. O'Connor, An Introduction to Biblical Hebrew Syntax (Eisenbrauns, 1990), §34.7a, §32.2.3dgrammar
  • Christo H. J. van der Merwe, Jacobus A. Naudé, Jan H. Kroeze, A Biblical Hebrew Reference Grammar, 2nd ed. (Bloomsbury, 2017), §19.4, §45.5.igrammar
  • Bill T. Arnold and John H. Choi, A Guide to Biblical Hebrew Syntax, 2nd ed. (Cambridge, 2018), §3.3.2grammar
  • Takamitsu Muraoka, Emphatic Words and Structures in Biblical Hebrew (Jerusalem: Magnes / Leiden: Brill, 1985), ch. VII, 138-146monograph
  • Stephen A. Kaufman, "An Emphatic Plea for Please," Maarav 7 (1991): 195-198article
  • Timothy D. Wilt, "A Sociolinguistic Analysis of NĀʾ," Vetus Testamentum 46/2 (1996): 237-255article
  • Ahouva Shulman, "The Particle נָא in Biblical Hebrew Prose," Hebrew Studies 40 (1999): 57-82article
  • Bent Christiansen, "A Linguistic Analysis of the Biblical Hebrew Particle nāʾ: A Test Case," Vetus Testamentum 59/3 (2009): 379-393article
  • Steven E. Fassberg, Studies in Biblical Syntax (Jerusalem: Magnes, 1994), 44-47monograph
  • Ernst Jenni, "Höfliche Bitte im Alten Testament," in Congress Volume Basel 2001, VTSup 92 (Brill, 2002), 1-16article
  • Hélène M. Dallaire, The Syntax of Volitives in Biblical Hebrew and Amarna Canaanite Prose, LSAWS 9 (Eisenbrauns, 2014), 53-58monograph
  • Anson F. Rainey, Canaanite in the Amarna Tablets, vol. 2 (Brill, 1996), 234-266monograph
  • John Huehnergard, "The Early Hebrew Prefix Conjugations," Hebrew Studies 29 (1988): 19-23article
  • Jan Joosten, The Verbal System of Biblical Hebrew, JBS 10 (Jerusalem: Simor, 2012)monograph

All attested forms of נָא

particle

נָא, נָּא

Gen 12:11, Gen 12:13, Gen 13:8, Gen 13:9, Gen 13:14, Gen 15:5, Gen 16:2, Gen 16:2