StrongerBible

anna

אָנָּא

HebrewH0577O, please, ...

Appears 13 times · tap a cell to see the verses

Gen 50:17Exo 32:312Ki 20:3Neh 1:5Neh 1:11Psa 116:4Psa 116:16Psa 118:25 (2×)Isa 38:3Dan 9:4Jon 1:14Jon 4:2
Compound of
Word studyResearch-gradeah-NAHinterjection

What anna means

the strongest "please" in Hebrew: a cry of urgent pleading, "Ah, I beg you!", spoken almost only to God and almost always at a moment of crisis

TranslatabilityPartialCertaintySettled

This is one short cry, and it stands at the very front of whatever the speaker goes on to say. It is built out of two pieces: a gasp of pain or alarm, "Ah!", and the small ordinary word that turns a command into a request, "please" (נָא). Stacking the two makes the most forceful plea the language has. It does not merely ask; it asks the way a person asks when something has gone badly wrong.

It appears only thirteen times, and nearly always at a hinge in the story, spoken to God:

  • Moses begging forgiveness after the golden calf
  • Hezekiah weeping on what he believes is his deathbed
  • the sailors in the storm, praying to the God of Israel for the first time
  • the long confessions of Nehemiah and Daniel after the exile
  • the crowd's doubled cry at the temple gate in Psalm 118

Usually the cry sits directly in front of the request, and a second "please" is attached to the request itself, so the plea is marked twice over. But not always. Once it opens an admission of guilt with no request attached (Exodus 32:31). Once it braces a declaration rather than a plea, "I am your servant" (Psalm 116:16). Once, in Jonah's mouth, the humblest word in the language is turned around into a complaint that God has been too merciful. And once it is aimed at a human being: Joseph's brothers use it to beg his pardon.

The doubled cry of Psalm 118:25, "please, LORD, save now," was sung at the great festivals, and the request it introduces is the phrase behind the shout the crowds raise in the Gospels, "Hosanna" (ὡσαννά).

Nuances

1athe plea itself: a cry for rescue or help, standing immediately in front of the request
2Ki 20:3Neh 1:11Psa 116:4Psa 118:25 (2×)Isa 38:3Jon 1:14
1bthe cry that opens a prayer of confession, leading either straight into the admission of sin or into the solemn address that frames it
Exo 32:31Neh 1:5Dan 9:4
1ca plea aimed at a person who holds power over the speaker, asking pardon
TranslatabilityApproximate
Gen 50:17
1dan emphatic appeal that braces a declaration instead of introducing a request
CertaintyStrong
Psa 116:16
1ethe same humble plea turned into protest, opening a complaint against God
Jon 4:2

Disputed

What the particle of entreaty נָא embedded in this compound actually contributes, and therefore how the compound generates its force. The disagreement concerns נָא itself, not the meaning of the interjection, on which BDB, HALOT, and DCH are unanimous.

  • majorityנָא is a marker of entreaty, functionally Biblical Hebrew's "please", softening a directive into a request; the compound therefore stacks an exclamation of distress onto a politeness marker to yield the strongest available plea.; BDB, s.v. נָא; Gesenius' Hebrew Grammar, ed. E. Kautzsch, tr. A. E. Cowley, 2nd Eng. ed. (Oxford: Clarendon, 1910), §105a-b; Paul Joüon and T. Muraoka, A Grammar of Biblical Hebrew, rev. Eng. ed. (Rome: Pontifical Biblical Institute, 2006), §105c; Stephen A. Kaufman, "An Emphatic Plea for Please," Maarav 7 (1991): 195-198
  • minorityנָא marks the following directive as a logical consequence of the immediately preceding statement or of the situation in which it is uttered, rather than as a form of politeness; the appearance of two such particles in one clause (Num 12:13) is held to tell against a simple "please".; Thomas O. Lambdin, Introduction to Biblical Hebrew (New York: Scribner's, 1971), 170-171; Bruce K. Waltke and M. O'Connor, An Introduction to Biblical Hebrew Syntax (Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns, 1990), §34.7; Steven E. Fassberg, Studies in Biblical Syntax (Jerusalem: Magnes, 1994), 36-73
  • minorityנָא is a politeness device of the sociolinguistic kind, marking an utterance as a personal request made of the addressee; its complete absence from legislative material is offered as decisive against any purely logical-consequence account.; Timothy Wilt, "A Sociolinguistic Analysis of NA'," Vetus Testamentum 46.2 (1996): 237-255; Ahouva Shulman, "The Particle נָא in Biblical Hebrew Prose," Hebrew Studies 40 (1999): 57-82

What scholars say about anna

The lexicographic tradition is unanimous. BDB defines אָנָּא as a strong particle of entreaty ("ah, now! I / we beseech thee"), often followed by an imperative, and parses it as a compound of the exclamation אָהּ with the particle of entreaty נָא; HALOT and DCH agree, and all three treat אָנָּא (seven occurrences) and אָנָּה (six) as orthographic variants of a single lemma, the final ה or א being a graphic matter, both forms being milra and both carrying the strengthened נ. The grammars classify it as an interjection: GKC §105a groups it with the primitive interjections אֲהָהּ, הוֹי, and אוֹי and derives it from אָהּ plus נָא; Joüon-Muraoka §105c call it a strong particle of entreaty followed by an imperative or by the divine name; Waltke-O'Connor likewise call it a particle of entreaty. Syntactically it stands outside the clause at the head of the utterance and is typically joined to an imperative bearing a second, enclitic נָא (Gen 50:17; Ps 118:25). Its nearest functional parallel is בִּי, used only of human superiors, whereas אָנָּא is reserved for divine address apart from Gen 50:17. The interrogative אָנָה "whither" (H0575) is a distinct word, marked by penultimate stress and the absence of the strengthened נ, as Delitzsch observed on Psalm 116; the near-homography produced some medieval exegetical disagreement at Ps 116:16. On etymology, the compound's closest cognate is Ugaritic an, analyzed as a primary interjection of entreaty by Cassuto, Tropper, and Andrason (2020); Klein alone posits אֲהָה rather than אָהּ as the base, and Strong's derivation from אַהֲבָה is rejected throughout the scholarly literature. Haupt, Gottlieb, and Zewi connect נָא with the West Semitic energic -n(n) endings, while Juhás (2017) concludes from the ancient versions that its pragmatic force is irreducibly context-dependent. The clustering of the word at Neh 1:5, 11 and Dan 9:4 has been read as evidence that Second Temple penitential prayer conventionalized it as a formulaic opening (Williamson, WBC; Collins, Hermeneia; Blenkinsopp, OTL), though its presence in Genesis and Exodus rules out treating it as a late word. Sasson reads Jonah 4:2 as a deliberate inversion, the deferential prayer particle put to bitter and complaining use. Ps 118:25, quadruply marked with entreaty morphology, became the defining cry of Second Temple festival worship (m. Sukkah 4:5, whence Hoshana Rabba); the contracted הוֹשַׁע נָא underlies Greek ὡσαννά, whose drift from petition to acclamation is traced by Werner (JBL 1946), Lohse (TDNT 9), and Fitzmyer, with Davies and Allison judging it largely an acclamation by the first century.

In-depth research

This is a research paper, so it may be hard to read without scholarly background. It is useful if you want to dig even deeper into this word.

Sources

  • BDB, s.v. אָנָּא (58a); s.v. נָא (609a)lexicon
  • HALOT, s.v. אָנָּא / אָנָּה (1:69); s.v. נָא (656)lexicon
  • DCH, s.v. אָנָּא (1:333); s.v. נָא (5:576)lexicon
  • Gesenius' Hebrew Grammar, ed. E. Kautzsch, tr. A. E. Cowley, 2nd Eng. ed. (Oxford: Clarendon, 1910), §105a-bgrammar
  • Paul Joüon and T. Muraoka, A Grammar of Biblical Hebrew, rev. Eng. ed. (Rome: Pontifical Biblical Institute, 2006), §105cgrammar
  • Bruce K. Waltke and M. O'Connor, An Introduction to Biblical Hebrew Syntax (Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns, 1990), §34.7grammar
  • Ernst Jenni, "אָהּ", in E. Jenni and C. Westermann, eds., Theological Lexicon of the Old Testament, tr. M. E. Biddle (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1997), 1:117theological-dictionary
  • R. L. Harris, G. L. Archer, and B. K. Waltke, eds., Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament (Chicago: Moody, 1980), entry 127theological-dictionary
  • Stephen A. Kaufman, "An Emphatic Plea for Please," Maarav 7 (1991): 195-198article
  • Thomas O. Lambdin, Introduction to Biblical Hebrew (New York: Scribner's, 1971), 170-171grammar
  • Steven E. Fassberg, Studies in Biblical Syntax (Jerusalem: Magnes, 1994), 36-73monograph
  • Ahouva Shulman, "The Particle נָא in Biblical Hebrew Prose," Hebrew Studies 40 (1999): 57-82article
  • Timothy Wilt, "A Sociolinguistic Analysis of NA'," Vetus Testamentum 46.2 (1996): 237-255article
  • Peter Juhás, Die biblisch-hebräische Partikel נא im Lichte der antiken Bibelübersetzungen, Studia Semitica Neerlandica 67 (Leiden: Brill, 2017)monograph
  • Alexander Andrason, "Primary Interjections in Ugaritic," Aula Orientalis 38.2 (2020): 209-243article
  • H. G. M. Williamson, Ezra, Nehemiah, WBC 16 (Waco: Word, 1985), 173-175commentary
  • John J. Collins, Daniel, Hermeneia (Minneapolis: Fortress, 1993), 347-359commentary
  • Joseph Blenkinsopp, Ezra-Nehemiah, OTL (Philadelphia: Westminster, 1988), 209-211commentary
  • Jack M. Sasson, Jonah, Anchor Bible 24B (New York: Doubleday, 1990), 133-134commentary
  • Franz Delitzsch, Biblical Commentary on the Psalms, tr. Francis Bolton (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1871), on Psalm 116commentary
  • Eric Werner, "Hosanna in the Gospels," Journal of Biblical Literature 65.2 (1946): 97-122article
  • Eduard Lohse, "ὡσαννά," in G. Kittel and G. Friedrich, eds., Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, tr. G. W. Bromiley (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1974), 9:682-684theological-dictionary
  • Andrew C. Brunson, Psalm 118 in the Gospel of John, WUNT 2/158 (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2003)monograph

All attested forms of אָנָּא

particle

אָנָּא, אָנָּה

Gen 50:17, Exo 32:31, Neh 1:5, Neh 1:11, Psa 118:25, Psa 118:25, Dan 9:4, 2Ki 20:3