StrongerBible

mabbul

מַבּוּל

HebrewH3999flood, deluge

Appears 13 times · tap a cell to see the verses

Gen 6:17Gen 7:6Gen 7:7Gen 7:10Gen 7:17Gen 9:11 (2×)Gen 9:15Gen 9:28Gen 10:1Gen 10:32Gen 11:10Psa 29:10
Word studyResearch-grademab-BOOLnoun

What mabbul means

the Flood: the world-covering water God brought over the earth in Noah's day

TranslatabilityApproximateCertaintyStrong

Hebrew has a full set of words for water that falls and water that rises: ordinary rain (מָטָר), a drenching shower (גֶּשֶׁם), a sudden cloudburst (זֶרֶם), the deep water below the earth (תְּהוֹם). This word belongs to none of them. It is held back for one event, the catastrophe of Noah's day, and twelve of its thirteen appearances sit inside Genesis 6 to 11. The story keeps the vocabulary sorted: the rain that falls for forty days is called rain, the springs that burst open belong to the deep, and this word names the whole disaster they add up to.

Because it names one particular event, it nearly always appears as "the" Flood, the way people say "the Depression" and expect no explanation. Genesis 6:17 even sets it beside the everyday word for water, so the sentence reads something like "the Flood, that is, water over the earth", as though the writer knew the rarer word needed a gloss for some readers. A verse later the narrative puts it the other way round and speaks of "the waters of the Flood".

One word ends up covering a small range because the story keeps returning to the same event from different angles: the water as it comes and rises, the water God promises will never come again, and finally the event as a bare date that Noah's remaining years and his sons' descendants are counted from. The scale is what holds those angles together. Genesis 7:11 has the water above the sky and the deep below let loose at once, so many readers hear in this word the coming apart of the world's first ordering rather than a very large storm.

One more thing marks the word off: it never travels into figures of speech. When prophets want judgment sweeping in like water they reach for a different word (שֶׁטֶף). This one stayed bonded to Noah, and the ancient Greek translators kept it that way, choosing a single Greek word for it (κατακλυσμός) that the New Testament then uses only of the same event.

Nuances

1athe Flood as the event itself: the water God brought over the whole earth, and its rising
Gen 6:17Gen 7:6Gen 7:7Gen 7:10Gen 7:17Gen 9:11 (2×)
1ba deluge of that same kind, in God's promise that he will never send another
TranslatabilityPartial
Gen 9:11 (2×)Gen 9:15
1cthe Flood as a point in time, the event later generations are dated from
TranslatabilityDirect
Gen 9:28Gen 10:1Gen 10:32Gen 11:10
1dthe Flood in the one line outside the story of Noah, where a psalm about God's kingship sets him in relation to it
TranslatabilityPartialCertaintyContested
Psa 29:10
Psa 29:10

What the psalm means when it says the LORD sat "to the flood" in Psalm 29:10. The psalm is a storm hymn about God's kingship, and this is the only occurrence of the word outside the flood narrative of Genesis 6 to 11, so its referent here has been debated since the 1920s. The Hebrew preposition can be construed spatially ("enthroned over the flood") or temporally ("enthroned since before the flood"), and the noun itself has been taken as the Noahic deluge, as the celestial reservoir above the firmament, or as a personified chaos-water. The syntax alone cannot decide the question, and the parallel phrase "forever" in the second half of the verse has been claimed in support of more than one reading.

  • contestedA retrospective reference to Noah's deluge: God, who sat in judgment over that water, reigns as king forever. This is the traditional reading and stands behind most English versions, and its strength is lexical consistency with the other twelve occurrences.; Derek Kidner, Psalms 1-72 (Tyndale Old Testament Commentaries; London: IVP, 1973), 127; Allen P. Ross, A Commentary on the Psalms (Grand Rapids: Kregel), on Psalm 29:10; Gerhard F. Hasel, "Some Issues Regarding the Nature and Universality of the Genesis Flood Narrative," Origins 5 (1978): 83-98, at 92-93
  • minorityThe celestial ocean: the word denotes the reservoir of waters above the firmament, over which God is enthroned, rather than the historical deluge.; J. Begrich, "Mabbul: Eine exegetisch-lexikalische Studie," Zeitschrift fur Semitistik 6 (1928): 135-153; W. F. Albright, "The Babylonian Matter in the Predeuteronomic Primeval History," JBL 58 (1939): 91-103, at 98; Gerhard von Rad, Genesis: A Commentary, rev. ed. (Philadelphia: Westminster, 1972), 128; HALOT 2:541 (entertains the sense)
  • contestedA Canaanite storm-god pattern lies beneath the psalm: the deity is enthroned over a conquered cosmic water, Cross rendering the noun "the Flood-dragon" and comparing Ugaritic mdb in KTU 1.101:1-2.; Frank Moore Cross, Canaanite Myth and Hebrew Epic (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1973), 147 n. 4, 151-156; Mitchell Dahood, Psalms I: 1-50 (Anchor Bible 16; Garden City: Doubleday, 1966), 180; Peter C. Craigie, Psalms 1-50 (Word Biblical Commentary 19; Waco: Word, 1983), 246-249; John Day, God's Conflict with the Dragon and the Sea (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985), 57-60
  • minorityThe preposition is temporal, on the model of Akkadian lam abubi "before the Deluge": the LORD has been enthroned since before the Flood, which he wielded as his instrument and never fought as an adversary.; David Toshio Tsumura, "'The Deluge' (mabbul) in Psalm 29:10," Ugarit-Forschungen 20 (1988): 351-355; David Toshio Tsumura, Creation and Destruction: A Reappraisal of the Chaoskampf Theory in the Old Testament (Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns, 2005)

What scholars say about mabbul

Modern lexicography derives the noun from Hebrew root ybl "to flow, carry, bring," with the weak first consonant assimilating into the doubled b (HALOT 2:541; DCH 5:124-25; Gesenius 18; P. Stenmans, "mabbul," TDOT 8 [1997]: 60-65). Cassuto made the derivation programmatic (A Commentary on the Book of Genesis, Part II: From Noah to Abraham [Jerusalem: Magnes, 1964], 45), noting cognate water nouns from the same root (yubal/yabal "watercourse," Isa 30:25; 44:4; Jer 17:8), Ugaritic ybl, and Arabic wabala "to rain heavily." Delitzsch's nineteenth-century derivation from Akkadian nabalu "to destroy," followed cautiously by BDB 550, is now uniformly rejected on semantic and phonological grounds (Stenmans, TDOT 8:61; Tsumura; M. Grisanti, NIDOTTE 2:835-37), as is any direct descent from Akkadian abubu, the Mesopotamian Deluge word (Lambert and Millard, Atra-Hasis [Oxford: Clarendon, 1969], 126, 134-37). Tawil connects the Hebrew noun instead to Akkadian bubbulu/biblu "high water, inundation" (An Akkadian Lexical Companion for Biblical Hebrew [Jersey City: Ktav, 2009], 196; CAD B 299-301), which shares the same underlying root, so that proposal converges with the ybl derivation rather than competing with it; TWOT 1142 calls bubbulu the best Akkadian candidate while noting the Akkadian flood stories never use it. The medieval derivation from nbl "to fall, wither" (Radak, Ibn Ezra at Gen 6:17, Sforno, S. D. Luzzatto), which yields the later rabbinic phrase "a flood of fire," is rejected phonologically and semantically. Two outliers: Gordon and Malamat noted an Eblaite equation of ma-ba-lum with Sumerian A-KUL "mighty water" (Eblaitica 1 [1987], 28; ZAW 100 Suppl. [1988]: 156-60), and Amzallag has argued the noun originally denoted molten metal (Ancient Near Eastern Studies 56 [2019]: 289-310), a proposal with no following. On usage, the lexica and commentators agree the noun is a reserved technical term for the Noahic Deluge, marked by its near-invariant definite article (TWOT 1142; Sarna, JPS Genesis [1989], 48, 51; Wenham, Genesis 1-15 [WBC 1; 1987], 170-71); the sequence mabbul mayim at Gen 6:17 and 7:6 is therefore appositional rather than a genitive construction (Speiser, Genesis [AB 1; 1964], 47; Hasel, Origins 5 [1978]: 92-93; Cassuto 1964, 66-67), and the reversal to "waters of the mabbul" at Gen 7:7, 10 confirms that the narrator glossed a rare word with an everyday one. Westermann (Genesis 1-11 [1984], 434-35), von Rad (Genesis [1972], 128) and Sarna read the event as the undoing of creation, the bounded waters of Gen 1:6-7 and the deep of Gen 7:11 collapsing back on the dry land, which gives the noun cosmological weight beyond volume of water. Psalm 29:10 remains contested among four readings (see the disputes on that verse); Tsumura's Ugarit-Forschungen 20 (1988): 351-55 argument has broken the alleged etymological link between the Hebrew noun and Ugaritic mdb (from dwb; HALOT 1:215), where the word stands in a simile rather than as a defeated adversary, and has proposed a temporal reading of the preposition on the analogy of Akkadian lam abubi, but it has not displaced the traditional spatial rendering. The Septuagint renders the noun consistently with kataklysmos throughout Genesis 6-11 and at LXX Ps 28:10, fixing its technical status for Greek readers; Jerome uses diluvium, the Targums tophana, and every New Testament occurrence of kataklysmos refers to Noah's Flood.

Where scholars disagree about mabbul

Whether the noun ever denotes the celestial reservoir of waters above the firmament rather than the deluge itself. Begrich argued on source-critical grounds that in the Priestly flood texts and in Psalm 29:10 the word means the Himmelsozean, the bounded upper waters of Gen 1:6-7, while elsewhere it denotes the concrete inundation; the question bears directly on how Psalm 29:10 is read and on how much cosmology the noun carries in Genesis.

  • majorityThe noun denotes the deluge throughout; no evidence supports a distinct celestial-ocean sense.; Gerhard F. Hasel, Origins 5 (1978): 92-93; Michael A. Grisanti, NIDOTTE 2:835-37; Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament, entry 1142
  • minorityIn some texts, and above all in Psalm 29:10, the noun denotes the reservoir of waters above the firmament rather than the water that fell from it.; J. Begrich, "Mabbul: Eine exegetisch-lexikalische Studie," Zeitschrift fur Semitistik 6 (1928): 135-53; W. F. Albright, Journal of Biblical Literature 58 (1939): 98; Gerhard von Rad, Genesis: A Commentary, rev. ed. (1972), 128; Claus Westermann, Genesis 1-11 (1984), 434-35; HALOT 2:541 and DCH 5:124 allow the sense
In-depth research

This is a research paper, so it may be hard to read without scholarly background. It is useful if you want to dig even deeper into this word.

Sources

  • HALOT 2:541lexicon
  • DCH 5:124-25lexicon
  • BDB, 550lexicon
  • P. Stenmans, "mabbul," in Theological Dictionary of the Old Testament 8 (1997): 60-65theological-dictionary
  • Michael A. Grisanti, in New International Dictionary of Old Testament Theology and Exegesis 2:835-37theological-dictionary
  • R. Laird Harris et al., Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament, entry 1142theological-dictionary
  • Umberto Cassuto, A Commentary on the Book of Genesis, Part II: From Noah to Abraham, trans. I. Abrahams (Jerusalem: Magnes, 1964), 45, 66-67commentary
  • Nahum M. Sarna, Genesis (JPS Torah Commentary; Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society, 1989), 48, 51commentary
  • Gordon J. Wenham, Genesis 1-15 (Word Biblical Commentary 1; Waco: Word, 1987), 170-71commentary
  • E. A. Speiser, Genesis (Anchor Bible 1; Garden City: Doubleday, 1964), 47commentary
  • Claus Westermann, Genesis 1-11: A Continental Commentary, trans. J. J. Scullion (Minneapolis: Augsburg, 1984), 434-35commentary
  • Gerhard von Rad, Genesis: A Commentary, rev. ed. (Philadelphia: Westminster, 1972), 128commentary
  • Gerhard F. Hasel, "Some Issues Regarding the Nature and Universality of the Genesis Flood Narrative," Origins 5 (1978): 83-98article
  • David Toshio Tsumura, "'The Deluge' (mabbul) in Psalm 29:10," Ugarit-Forschungen 20 (1988): 351-55article
  • David Toshio Tsumura, Creation and Destruction: A Reappraisal of the Chaoskampf Theory in the Old Testament (Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns, 2005)monograph
  • Frank Moore Cross, Canaanite Myth and Hebrew Epic (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1973), 151-56monograph
  • Peter C. Craigie, Psalms 1-50 (Word Biblical Commentary 19; Waco: Word, 1983), 246-49commentary
  • John Day, God's Conflict with the Dragon and the Sea (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985), 57-60monograph
  • J. Begrich, "Mabbul: Eine exegetisch-lexikalische Studie," Zeitschrift fur Semitistik 6 (1928): 135-53article
  • W. F. Albright, "The Babylonian Matter in the Predeuteronomic Primeval History," Journal of Biblical Literature 58 (1939): 91-103article
  • Hayim Tawil, An Akkadian Lexical Companion for Biblical Hebrew (Jersey City: Ktav, 2009), 196lexicon
  • W. G. Lambert and A. R. Millard, Atra-Hasis: The Babylonian Story of the Flood (Oxford: Clarendon, 1969), 126, 134-37critical-edition
  • Nissim Amzallag, "Beyond the Flood: The Original Meaning of mabbul in Biblical Hebrew," Ancient Near Eastern Studies 56 (2019): 289-310article

All attested forms of מַבּוּל

m s absolute

מַּבּוּל, מַבּוּל

Gen 6:17, Gen 7:6, Gen 7:7, Gen 7:10, Gen 7:17, Gen 9:11, Gen 9:28, Gen 10:1