StrongerBible

ḥol

חֹל

HebrewH2455common, profane, ...

Appears 7 times · tap a cell to see the verses

Lev 10:101Sa 21:4(5)1Sa 21:5(6)Ezk 22:26Ezk 42:20Ezk 44:23Ezk 48:15
Root family
Word studyKHOHLadjective used as a noun

What ḥol means

common: ordinary rather than holy, not claimed by God and so free for everyday use

TranslatabilityApproximateCertaintyStrong

Israel's priests worked with two separate pairs, not one sliding scale. The first pair asks whether something belongs to God: holy (קֹדֶשׁ) or common. The second asks whether it is fit to come near him: clean (טָהוֹר) or unclean (טָמֵא). This word sits on the first pair, and it is the neutral half of it. Common does not mean dirty, sinful, or offensive. It means that a thing has not been handed over to God, so ordinary people may use it in ordinary ways.

Most of its seven appearances belong to one job description. The priest is to mark the line between what belongs to God and what does not, and to teach the people where that line runs. Leviticus 10:10 sets the task, Ezekiel 22:26 charges the priests with failing at it, and Ezekiel 44:23 hands it back to them as a duty in the restored temple. Ezekiel even builds the line into stone: the wall around the temple area exists to keep holy ground and common ground apart (Ezekiel 42:20).

The word can also simply label a particular thing as everyday:

  • bread anyone may eat, as against the loaves kept for the sanctuary
  • a journey that is nobody's sacred errand
  • land assigned to the city for houses and pasture rather than to the temple

None of those are insults. They are the plain, unremarkable world, which is exactly what makes the holy stand out against it.

Movement runs both ways across the line. Consecrating something lifts it out of the common and into God's keeping. Profaning it (חָלַל) drags it back down into common use as though God had no claim on it. Being common is not the offense; treating what belongs to God as if it were merely common is.

Nuances

1athe everyday sphere: the whole category of what does not belong to God, the line priests are charged to mark and to teach
Lev 10:10Ezk 22:26Ezk 42:20Ezk 44:23
1bsaid of a particular thing: ordinary, not consecrated, and so available for everyday use
TranslatabilityDirect
1Sa 21:4(5)1Sa 21:5(6)Ezk 48:15

Disputed

Whether the word names a neutral third category, permitted for ordinary use, or carries the negative overtone of something profaned.

  • majorityA neutral category. Priestly law works with two independent pairs, holy versus common and clean versus unclean, and the common is the permitted default state of whatever God has not claimed.; Jacob Milgrom, Leviticus 1-16 (Anchor Bible 3; New York: Doubleday, 1991), on 10:10; Philip Peter Jenson, Graded Holiness: A Key to the Priestly Conception of the World (JSOTSup 106; Sheffield: JSOT Press, 1992)
  • minorityThe noun leans negative, closer to profaneness than to mere ordinariness, since it is built on the root behind the verb meaning to profane; older lexical glosses reflect this.; BDB, s.v. חֹל

What scholars say about ḥol

The lexica agree on the sense: HALOT and DCH gloss חֹל as what is not sacred, BDB as commonness or profaneness. All seven occurrences fall in priestly and Ezekielian material, and five of them stand in the paired formula opposing קֹדֶשׁ to חֹל, three of those alongside the טָמֵא / טָהוֹר pair (Leviticus 10:10; Ezekiel 22:26; 44:23). Milgrom on Leviticus 10:10 and Jenson's Graded Holiness set the terms of current discussion: the two pairs are independent axes rather than one graded scale, with חֹל the permitted default of whatever is not consecrated, and the holy/common boundary crossable in both directions by consecration and by profanation (on the cognate verb חלל see TDOT). Ezekiel extends the term spatially, to ground outside the temple wall (42:20) and to territory allotted to the city rather than the sanctuary (48:15); Zimmerli reads these within the book's graded temple topography. The one textually contested instance is 1 Samuel 21:5 in English numbering (21:6 in Hebrew), where the syntax of דֶּרֶךְ חֹל in David's reply is variously construed and some commentators emend; the non-sacral force of the term itself is not in doubt.

Sources

  • HALOT, s.v. חֹלlexicon
  • BDB, s.v. חֹלlexicon
  • DCH, s.v. חֹלlexicon
  • Jacob Milgrom, Leviticus 1-16 (Anchor Bible 3; New York: Doubleday, 1991), on 10:10commentary
  • Philip Peter Jenson, Graded Holiness: A Key to the Priestly Conception of the World (JSOTSup 106; Sheffield: JSOT Press, 1992)monograph
  • TDOT, s.v. חללtheological-dictionary
  • Walther Zimmerli, Ezekiel 2 (Hermeneia; Philadelphia: Fortress, 1983), on 42:20 and 44:23commentary
  • P. Kyle McCarter, I Samuel (Anchor Bible 8; New York: Doubleday, 1980), on 21:4-6commentary

All attested forms of חֹל

m s absolute

חֹל

Lev 10:10, 1Sa 21:4, 1Sa 21:5, Ezk 22:26, Ezk 42:20, Ezk 44:23, Ezk 48:15