StrongerBible

arbeh

אַרְבֶּה

HebrewH0697locust, grasshopper

Appears 24 times · tap a cell to see the verses

Exo 10:4Exo 10:12Exo 10:13Exo 10:14 (2×)Exo 10:19 (2×)Lev 11:22Deu 28:38Jdg 6:5Jdg 7:121Ki 8:37
Root family
Word studyResearch-gradear-BEHnoun

What arbeh means

locust: the swarming, migratory insect that arrives in devouring clouds and eats a land bare, and the ordinary Hebrew word for it

TranslatabilityDirectCertaintyStrong

This is the Bible's default word for the locust, and nearly every modern lexicon identifies the creature behind it as the desert locust in its swarming phase, the insect that gathers into vast travelling clouds and leaves nothing green. It is usually a collective: one word for the whole swarm rather than for a single bug. Only once, when the wind sweeps the plague out of Egypt and "not one locust remained," is a single insect clearly in view. Almost a third of its uses belong to that plague story, which fixed the word in Israel's memory as the picture of a harvest lost overnight.

From there the word is put to a surprising range of work:

  • It is the instrument of judgment in the plague on Egypt, and the loss of a crop threatened in the covenant curses.
  • It is the standard picture of a host too many to count, so enemy camps and invading armies are said to arrive "like locusts."
  • It is a wisdom teacher: a war horse leaps like it, and it marches out in ranks with no king to give the order.
  • It is food, the first of the hopping insects Israel was permitted to eat.
  • Once, remarkably, it pictures a person rather than a multitude, a man shaken off like a bug flicked from a coat.

Hebrew writers heard the name echoing their verb for "being many," and they played on the resemblance: the Midianites come "like locusts for multitude," and an army invading Egypt is "more numerous than the locust." Specialists now think the name is in fact a very old inherited noun that only looks related to that verb, since the same word turns up across the Semitic languages in a shape the derivation cannot explain. The wordplay is still real in the writers' hands; it just tells us what they heard in the name rather than where the name came from.

Hebrew has an unusually crowded vocabulary for locusts, and this is the general term among them. It heads the short list of edible kinds, and it stands beside three other names in Joel's account of a devastated countryside (גָּזָם, יֶלֶק, and חָסִיל). Whether those companions name separate insects, successive stages of one insect's growth, or are simply poetry piling up words for ruin has never been settled.

Nuances

1athe locust itself: the swarm that descends on a land and strips its crops
Exo 10:4Exo 10:12Exo 10:13Exo 10:14 (2×)Exo 10:19 (2×)Deu 28:381Ki 8:372Ch 6:28Psa 78:46Psa 105:34Jol 1:4Jol 2:25
Jol 1:4

Whether the four locust names listed together in Joel 1:4 denote four species, four developmental stages of a single locust generation, or are near-synonyms piled up rhetorically.

  • majorityThey are poetic near-synonyms accumulated for rhetorical effect, not an entomological code. The reversed order of the same four names at Joel 2:25 tells against any fixed sequence.; Leslie C. Allen, The Books of Joel, Obadiah, Jonah and Micah (NICOT; Eerdmans, 1976), 49-50; James L. Crenshaw, Joel (AB 24C; Doubleday, 1995), 86-90; John Barton, Joel and Obadiah (OTL; Westminster John Knox, 2001), 43-44; Ronald A. Simkins, Yahweh's Activity in History and Nature in the Book of Joel (Edwin Mellen, 1991)
  • minorityThey name successive stages in the life cycle of one locust generation, with this word standing for the mature winged adult.; John A. Thompson, Joel's Locusts in the Light of Near Eastern Parallels, JNES 14 (1955): 52-55; Ovid R. Sellers, Stages of Locust in Joel, AJSL 52 (1935-36): 81-85; Hans Walter Wolff, Joel and Amos (Hermeneia; Fortress, 1977), 27
  • minorityThey name distinct species of Palestinian orthoptera, this one being the desert locust.; I. Aharoni, On Some Animals Mentioned in the Bible, Osiris 5 (1938): 461-478; F. S. Bodenheimer, Animal and Man in Bible Lands (Brill, 1960)
Jol 2:25

Whether the locusts of Joel 2 are literal insects, a metaphor for a human invading army, or an eschatological army.

  • majorityReal locusts, continuous with the infestation described in Joel 1.; James L. Crenshaw, Joel (AB 24C; Doubleday, 1995), 121-122; Ronald A. Simkins, Yahweh's Activity in History and Nature in the Book of Joel (Edwin Mellen, 1991); John Barton, Joel and Obadiah (OTL; Westminster John Knox, 2001), 43-44
  • minorityThe locusts are a metaphor for a human army throughout.; Douglas Stuart, Hosea-Jonah (WBC 31; Word, 1987)
  • minorityJoel 2:1-11 describes an apocalyptic army rather than an insect plague.; Hans Walter Wolff, Joel and Amos (Hermeneia; Fortress, 1977), 41-42
1bthe locust as food: the first of the named hopping insects Israel was allowed to eat
Lev 11:22
1cthe locust admired for what it does: its powerful leap and its orderly advance
Job 39:20Pro 30:27
1dan image of a multitude beyond counting: a camp or army said to come like locusts
TranslatabilityApproximate
Jdg 6:5Jdg 7:12Jer 46:23Nam 3:15
1ethe swarm as a picture of what masses impressively and then is suddenly gone
Nam 3:17
1fa single, dispensable insect flicked away: an image of being frail and discarded
Psa 109:23

Disputed

Whether the word designates one particular species of locust or is a general Hebrew term for the swarming locust.

  • contestedIt designates a specific insect, the desert locust Schistocerca gregaria, precisely enough that the dietary legislation depends on zoological identification; the formula according to its kind at Leviticus 11:22 presupposes species-level differentiation.; Jacob Milgrom, Leviticus 1-16 (AB 3; Doubleday, 1991), 664-665; F. S. Bodenheimer, Animal and Man in Bible Lands (Brill, 1960); Oded Borowski, Every Living Thing: Daily Use of Animals in Ancient Israel (AltaMira, 1998)
  • contestedIt is the generic Hebrew term for the swarming locust rather than a zoological label, and no consistent species mapping of the Hebrew locust vocabulary has commanded consensus.; John A. Thompson, Translation of the Words for Locust, The Bible Translator 25 (1974): 405-411; John Barton, Joel and Obadiah (OTL; Westminster John Knox, 2001), 43-44; DCH, s.v. אַרְבֶּה
  • minorityThe locust names of Leviticus 11 designate halakhic categories of jumping insects recognized in rabbinic tradition rather than species.; Zohar Amar, ha-Arbeh be-Masoret Yisrael (Bar-Ilan University Press, 2004)

What scholars say about arbeh

Modern lexicography is quietly agreed on the referent and unsettled on nearly everything around it. HALOT (1:83) glosses the noun as migratory locust and, with Gesenius18, treats it as a Common Semitic primary noun, reconstructed as *ʾarbay-, rather than as a formation from רבה; BDB (s.v.) keeps the traditional derivation from רבה while registering Delitzsch's alternative root ארב, and notes the collective force plus the single unambiguous singular at Exodus 10:19; DCH declines to commit to a root and simply catalogs the 24 attestations. The comparative dossier is unusually rich: Akkadian erbû / aribû (CAD E 256-259; AHw 234), Ugaritic ỉrby in the Kirta epic (KTU 1.14 ii 50, a direct parallel to the Midianite similes of Judges 6:5 and 7:12), Old Aramaic ʾrbh in the Sefire treaty curse (KAI 222 A:27, the closest parallel to Deuteronomy 28:38), Sabaic ʾrby, and Modern South Arabian forms whose root-final y (Mehri ḥarbyēt, Jibbali ʾírbɔ́t) is the decisive argument against deriving the noun from a III-h verb (Köhler, ZDPV 49 [1926]: 328-331; Militarev and Kogan, SED no. 2321). Identification with Schistocerca gregaria in its gregarious phase is standard (Bodenheimer; Aharoni; Milgrom, Leviticus 1-16, 664-665), though Thompson, Barton, and Amar read the term generically. The sharpest live dispute concerns the quartet גזם, ארבה, ילק, חסיל in Joel 1:4 and 2:25: Credner, Sellers, Thompson, and Wolff read developmental stages; Aharoni reads species; Allen, Crenshaw, Barton, and Simkins read rhetorical near-synonyms, and the reversed order of the four names between the two Joel passages is generally treated as the strongest evidence against a life-cycle scheme. Septuagint practice is notoriously uneven (βροῦχος at Leviticus 11:22 and 1 Kings 8:37 against ἀκρίς at 2 Chronicles 6:28), while Joel maintains a stable one-to-one equivalence within the book.

Where scholars disagree about arbeh

Where the noun comes from: whether it is an aqtel formation from רבה (to be many), a formation from a distinct root ארב (to devastate), or a Proto-Semitic primary noun unrelated to either.

  • majorityA Common Semitic primary noun, reconstructed as *ʾarbay-, etymologically unrelated to רבה; the biblical writers' association with that verb is folk etymology, real to the biblical mind but indefensible comparatively. The root-final y preserved in Ugaritic, Sabaic, and Modern South Arabian is decisive.; HALOT, s.v. אַרְבֶּה; Gesenius18, s.v. אַרְבֶּה; Ludwig Köhler, Die Bezeichnungen der Heuschrecke im AT, ZDPV 49 (1926): 328-331; Alexander Militarev and Leonid Kogan, Semitic Etymological Dictionary, vol. 2: Animal Names (Ugarit-Verlag, 2005), no. 2321
  • minorityA formation from רבה, so that the noun means something like the multitudinous one; the explicit glosses with the word for multitude at Judges 6:5, 7:12, and Jeremiah 46:23 support the association.; BDB, s.v. אַרְבֶּה; Umberto Cassuto, A Commentary on the Book of Exodus (Magnes, 1967), 124
  • minorityA formation from a separate root ארב (to devastate, lie in ambush), matching Assyrian aribu / eribu.; Franz Delitzsch, Assyrisches Handwörterbuch (Hinrichs, 1896), 126
In-depth research

This is a research paper, so it may be hard to read without scholarly background. It is useful if you want to dig even deeper into this word.

Sources

  • HALOT, s.v. אַרְבֶּהlexicon
  • BDB, s.v. אַרְבֶּהlexicon
  • DCH, s.v. אַרְבֶּהlexicon
  • Gesenius18, s.v. אַרְבֶּהlexicon
  • Jacob Milgrom, Leviticus 1-16 (AB 3; Doubleday, 1991), 664-665commentary
  • Hans Walter Wolff, Joel and Amos (Hermeneia; Fortress, 1977), 27commentary
  • James L. Crenshaw, Joel (AB 24C; Doubleday, 1995), 86-90commentary
  • Leslie C. Allen, The Books of Joel, Obadiah, Jonah and Micah (NICOT; Eerdmans, 1976), 49-50commentary
  • John Barton, Joel and Obadiah (OTL; Westminster John Knox, 2001), 43-44commentary
  • John A. Thompson, Joel's Locusts in the Light of Near Eastern Parallels, JNES 14 (1955): 52-55article
  • Ludwig Köhler, Die Bezeichnungen der Heuschrecke im AT, ZDPV 49 (1926): 328-331article
  • Alexander Militarev and Leonid Kogan, Semitic Etymological Dictionary, vol. 2: Animal Names (Ugarit-Verlag, 2005), no. 2321lexicon
  • F. S. Bodenheimer, Animal and Man in Bible Lands (Brill, 1960)monograph
  • William H. C. Propp, Exodus 1-18 (AB 2; Doubleday, 1999), 338-339commentary
  • Ronald A. Simkins, Yahweh's Activity in History and Nature in the Book of Joel (Edwin Mellen, 1991)monograph

All attested forms of אַרְבֶּה

m s absolute

אַרְבֶּה

Exo 10:4, Exo 10:12, Exo 10:13, Exo 10:14, Exo 10:14, Exo 10:19, Exo 10:19, Lev 11:22