StrongerBible

gazam

גָּזָם

HebrewH1501cutting locust, gnawing locust, ...

Appears 3 times · tap a cell to see the verses

Jol 1:4Jol 2:25Amo 4:9
Root family
Word studyResearch-gradegah-ZAHMnoun

What gazam means

a crop-destroying locust, named for the way it shears vegetation off

TranslatabilityPartialCertaintyContested

The name is a verdict, not a species label. Hebrew built this insect's name from a verb meaning "to cut off, prune, shear," so the word says roughly "the shearer." It identifies the creature by what it does to a vineyard rather than by how it looks, exactly the way another locust name in the same list means something like "the finisher" (חָסִיל).

All three appearances are scenes of ruin. In Joel 1:4 the shearer heads a chain of four locust names, each wave eating whatever the wave before it left. In Joel 2:25 the same four names return in a different order, with the shearer now last, as God promises to repay the years the swarm ate. In Amos 4:9 it stands alone: God struck the gardens, the vineyards, the fig trees and the olive trees, and the shearer devoured them.

That reshuffled order in Joel is why most scholars today no longer read the four names as four species, or as four stages in one insect's growth. A prophet describing a life cycle would not put the stages in a different order the second time around. The four names are better heard as four ways of naming a single catastrophe, each accusing the insect from a different angle: this one shears, one swarms in sheer numbers (אַרְבֶּה), one licks the ground bare (יֶלֶק), one finishes off whatever is left.

Amos settles the point that the shearer needs no chain of companions to make sense. Used by itself, with no sequence in view and mature olive trees as its victims, the word carries the whole weight of "the destroyer" on its own.

Jol 1:4Jol 2:25Amo 4:9

Disputed

Whether gazam denotes a specific insect or stage, or is simply a general name for the destructive locust.

  • majorityA general term for a destructive locust, with no species or developmental stage specified; the name describes the damage, not the taxon.; BDB, s.v. גָּזָם, p. 160; HALOT, s.v. גָּזָם; Duane A. Garrett, Hosea, Joel (New American Commentary 19A; Broadman and Holman, 1997), 316
  • minoritySpecifically an early, wingless, crawling stage of the desert locust, the reading preserved in the Aramaic tradition (Targum Jonathan and the Peshitta both render zaḥlā, a legless locust).; Wilhelm Gesenius, Thesaurus philologicus criticus linguae Hebraeae, s.v. גָּזָם; Yehuda Feliks, "Locust," Encyclopaedia Judaica (Keter, 1971); David Nevo, "The Desert Locust, Schistocerca gregaria, and Its Control in the Land of Israel and the Near East in Antiquity," Phytoparasitica 24 (1996): 7-32

What scholars say about gazam

The consensus etymology derives גָּזָם from a Northwest Semitic root גזם "to cut off, prune, shear," unattested as a verb in Biblical Hebrew but productive in Mishnaic Hebrew and Jewish Aramaic (Jastrow, s.v. גָּזַם; b. ʿAbodah Zarah 50b), with Arabic جزم (jazama) "to cut off, sever" as the parade external cognate (BDB 160; Klein, s.v. גזם I; Militarev and Kogan, Semitic Etymological Dictionary II, reconstructing Proto-Semitic *gVzim- "cut"). No locust-noun cognate is attested in Akkadian or Ugaritic, so the term looks like a specifically Northwest Semitic zoological coinage. The nominal pattern parallels חָסִיל "the finisher," indicating a name formed from behavior rather than taxonomy. On the four locust terms of Joel 1:4 and 2:25, the modern critical mainstream reads them as rhetorical near-synonyms piled up for intensification (Wolff, Joel and Amos, Hermeneia, 1977, 27-28; Crenshaw, Joel, AB 24C, 1995, 86-90; Barton, Joel and Obadiah, OTL, 2001, 42-47; Simkins, Yahweh's Activity in History and Nature in the Book of Joel, 1991, ch. 3), displacing the nineteenth-century developmental-stages synthesis of Credner and Driver. The decisive objections are the reshuffled order between Joel 1:4 and 2:25, the fact that אַרְבֶּה is elsewhere the generic locust term (roughly 24 occurrences), and Amos 4:9, where גָּזָם appears alone and devours mature olive trees. Paul (Amos, Hermeneia, 1991) reads the Amos occurrence as the generic destroyer within the standard covenant-curse imagery (compare Deuteronomy 28:38-42; 1 Kings 8:37). The ancient versions split: the Septuagint renders κάμπη and the Vulgate eruca, both "caterpillar," while Targum Jonathan and the Peshitta render zaḥlā, "crawling, wingless locust," a divergence that shows the referent was already uncertain in antiquity. Köhler's 1926 ZDPV study and HALOT after it withhold any stage identification.

Where scholars disagree about gazam

What the four locust names in Joel 1:4 and 2:25, gazam among them, actually designate.

  • majorityNear-synonymous poetic terms heaped up for intensification: four names for one catastrophe, each drawing on a different etymology (cutter, multiplier, licker, finisher) without designating discrete taxa or instars.; Hans Walter Wolff, Joel and Amos (Hermeneia; Fortress, 1977), 27-28; James L. Crenshaw, Joel (Anchor Bible 24C; Doubleday, 1995), 86-90; John Barton, Joel and Obadiah (Old Testament Library; Westminster John Knox, 2001), 42-47; Ronald A. Simkins, Yahweh's Activity in History and Nature in the Book of Joel (Mellen, 1991), ch. 3
  • minoritySuccessive developmental stages (instars) of the desert locust Schistocerca gregaria, the etymologies matching the feeding behavior of each phase.; Karl A. Credner, Der Prophet Joel (Halle, 1831); S. R. Driver, The Books of Joel and Amos (Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges; Cambridge University Press, 1897), 82-91; J. A. Thompson, "Joel's Locusts in the Light of Near Eastern Parallels," Journal of Near Eastern Studies 14 (1955): 52-55; David Nevo, "The Desert Locust, Schistocerca gregaria, and Its Control in the Land of Israel and the Near East in Antiquity," Phytoparasitica 24 (1996): 7-32
  • minorityFour distinct insect species, the oldest reading, reflected in the traditional Jewish commentators and in the King James Version's four English equivalents.; Samuel Bochart, Hierozoicon (London, 1663)
In-depth research

This is a research paper, so it may be hard to read without scholarly background. It is useful if you want to dig even deeper into this word.

Sources

  • BDB, s.v. גָּזָם, p. 160lexicon
  • HALOT, s.v. גָּזָםlexicon
  • TWOT §338a, s.v. גזםlexicon
  • Ernest Klein, A Comprehensive Etymological Dictionary of the Hebrew Language (Carta, 1987), s.v. גזם Ilexicon
  • Alexander Militarev and Leonid Kogan, Semitic Etymological Dictionary, vol. 2: Animal Names (Ugarit-Verlag, 2005)lexicon
  • Marcus Jastrow, A Dictionary of the Targumim, the Talmud Babli and Yerushalmi, and the Midrashic Literature, s.v. גָּזַםlexicon
  • Hans Walter Wolff, Joel and Amos (Hermeneia; Fortress, 1977), 27-28commentary
  • James L. Crenshaw, Joel (Anchor Bible 24C; Doubleday, 1995), 86-90commentary
  • John Barton, Joel and Obadiah (Old Testament Library; Westminster John Knox, 2001), 42-47commentary
  • Shalom M. Paul, Amos (Hermeneia; Fortress, 1991)commentary
  • Duane A. Garrett, Hosea, Joel (New American Commentary 19A; Broadman and Holman, 1997), 316commentary
  • S. R. Driver, The Books of Joel and Amos (Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges; Cambridge University Press, 1897), 82-91commentary
  • Ronald A. Simkins, Yahweh's Activity in History and Nature in the Book of Joel (Mellen, 1991)monograph
  • Pablo R. Andiñach, "The Locusts in the Message of Joel," Vetus Testamentum 42 (1992): 433-441article
  • Ludwig Köhler, "Die Bezeichnungen der Heuschrecke im Alten Testament," Zeitschrift des Deutschen Palästina-Vereins 49 (1926): 328-333article

All attested forms of גָּזָם

m s absolute

גָּזָם

Jol 1:4, Jol 2:25, Amo 4:9