StrongerBible

ken

כֵּן

HebrewH3654gnats, lice, ...

Appears 7 times · tap a cell to see the verses

Exo 8:16(12)Exo 8:17(13) (2×)Exo 8:18(14) (2×)Psa 105:31Isa 51:6
Root family
Word studyKANEnoun

What ken means

gnats: the tiny biting insects of Egypt's third plague, a pest that comes out of the dust and settles on people and animals in numbers nobody can count

TranslatabilityPartialCertaintyContested

Almost every use of this word belongs to one scene. Egypt has refused to let Israel go, and God tells Moses to have Aaron strike the dust of the ground so that the dust of the whole country turns into these insects. They get onto people and onto livestock. Egypt's own experts try to produce the same pest by their arts and cannot, and that is the moment they tell Pharaoh they are up against the finger of God. A psalm retelling the exodus names the creatures again in a single line, and Isaiah reaches for them once as a comparison.

Which insect this was has never been settled, because the account is interested in what the creatures did rather than in what they were. Everything it gives us is behavior:

  • they come out of the dust of the ground, not out of the river or the air
  • they get onto human beings and farm animals alike
  • Egypt's specialists try to produce the same pest and fail
  • nothing is said about ruined crops, only about bodies

The early Greek translation of Exodus took them as small stinging flies, gnats or mosquitoes, and that is where most modern versions land. Josephus and the later Jewish tradition read them as lice instead, which is why older English Bibles say "lice."

The plague that follows this one is a swarm whose creature the text never identifies at all (עָרֹב), and Psalm 105:31 sets the two side by side as consecutive blows. Hebrew also has an ordinary word for a fly (זְבוּב), and Exodus did not use it here. Whatever these creatures were, they were small enough and numerous enough that Isaiah could later picture the inhabitants of the earth dying like them, a death so slight that nobody stops to count it.

Nuances

1athe insects of Egypt's third plague, formed from the dust of the ground and settling on people and animals
Exo 8:16(12)Exo 8:17(13) (2×)Exo 8:18(14) (2×)Psa 105:31
1bthe same creature used as a comparison, for something so slight that its dying passes unnoticed
TranslatabilityApproximate
Isa 51:6

Disputed

Which insect the third plague consisted of. The narrative describes what the creatures did without saying what they were, the noun occurs almost nowhere else, and the ancient translations already disagree, so every identification rests on the versions, on the behavior the text reports, and on the natural history of the Nile valley.

  • majoritySmall flying, biting insects: gnats or mosquitoes. The Greek Old Testament uses terms for small stinging flies in both Exodus and the Psalter, Jerome's Latin borrows the Greek word, and the standard lexica gloss the noun as gnats or mosquitoes; the link the narrative draws between water, dust, and pest suits insects breeding as the Nile inundation recedes.; HALOT, s.v. כֵּן; BDB, s.v. כֵּן; DCH, s.v. כן; Greta Hort, "The Plagues of Egypt," Zeitschrift für die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft 69 (1957): 84-103 and 70 (1958): 48-59
  • minorityLice or a similar crawling parasite of people and animals. Josephus reports the third plague this way, the classical Jewish exegetical tradition followed suit, and the reading suits a pest said to be on human beings and livestock rather than in the air; it is the basis of the older English rendering "lice," which the Jewish Publication Society translation retains.; Josephus, Jewish Antiquities, Book 2 (the plague narrative); Nahum M. Sarna, Exodus, JPS Torah Commentary (Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society, 1991)
  • contestedThe species is beyond recovery. The account supplies behavior rather than description, the noun has no secure cognate to settle it, and the ancient renderings are themselves early interpretations rather than independent evidence of the creature.; William H. C. Propp, Exodus 1-18, Anchor Bible 2 (New York: Doubleday, 1999); Cornelis Houtman, Exodus, Historical Commentary on the Old Testament (Kampen: Kok, 1993-2002)

What scholars say about ken

The noun occurs seven times in five verses: four times in the third-plague narrative of Exodus 8:16-18 (Hebrew numbering 8:12-14), once in Psalm 105:31, and once, on the standard lexical analysis, in Isaiah 51:6. Two forms appear, the plural כִּנִּים and the form כִּנָּם; BDB treats the latter as a collective and glosses the entry gnat, gnats, gnat swarm, while others explain its final mem as a plural ending of a type known from Northwest Semitic dialects. HALOT and DCH keep the identification gnats or mosquitoes. The versions are already interpretation rather than evidence: the Septuagint of Exodus renders the word σκνῖφες and the Greek Psalter σκνῖπες, terms for small stinging flies or mosquitoes, and Jerome's sciniphes is a Latin borrowing of the Greek. Josephus, by contrast, reports the plague as lice, and that identification carried through the classical Jewish exegetical tradition into the older English versions, where Tyndale and the King James Bible read lice; the Jewish Publication Society translation still does. Greta Hort's two-part reconstruction of the plague sequence (ZAW 69 [1957] and ZAW 70 [1958]) argued for mosquitoes breeding in the receding Nile inundation, which suits the connection the narrative draws between the water, the dust, and the pest. William Propp (Anchor Bible) and Cornelis Houtman (Historical Commentary on the Old Testament) survey the ancient and modern proposals and treat the species as beyond recovery, noting that the narrative supplies behavior rather than description: the creatures derive from the dust of the ground, they afflict human beings and livestock together, and the Egyptian practitioners cannot reproduce them. The etymology is not secure and no cognate settles the question, which is why the identification is argued from the versions and from the natural history of the Nile valley rather than from the word itself. Isaiah 51:6 is a separate crux: BDB and HALOT list the phrase there under this noun, yielding that the inhabitants of the earth will die like gnats, a reading adopted by the Revised Standard Version and its successors and by the New International Version, while the King James tradition reads the same consonants as the common adverb כֵּן and renders in like manner. Goldingay and Payne set out both options in the International Critical Commentary and note that the pointing does not decide between them.

Sources

  • HALOT, s.v. כֵּןlexicon
  • BDB, s.v. כֵּןlexicon
  • DCH, s.v. כןlexicon
  • Greta Hort, "The Plagues of Egypt," Zeitschrift für die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft 69 (1957): 84-103 and 70 (1958): 48-59article
  • William H. C. Propp, Exodus 1-18, Anchor Bible 2 (New York: Doubleday, 1999)commentary
  • Nahum M. Sarna, Exodus, JPS Torah Commentary (Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society, 1991)commentary
  • Cornelis Houtman, Exodus, Historical Commentary on the Old Testament (Kampen: Kok, 1993-2002)commentary
  • Josephus, Jewish Antiquities, Book 2 (the plague narrative)primary-source
  • John Goldingay and David Payne, Isaiah 40-55, International Critical Commentary (London: T&T Clark, 2006)commentary

All attested forms of כֵּן

m p absolute

כִּנִּים, כִנִּם

Exo 8:17, Exo 8:18, Psa 105:31, Exo 8:16

m s absolute

כִּנָּם, כֵן

Exo 8:17, Exo 8:18, Isa 51:6