StrongerBible

kēnsos

κῆνσος

GreekG2778tax, tribute, ...

Appears 4 times · tap a cell to see the verses

Mat 17:25Mat 22:17Mat 22:19Mrk 12:14
Word studyResearch-gradeKANE-sosnoun

What kēnsos means

the Roman tax: money a subject people owed the emperor, charged on persons and property rather than on goods in transit

TranslatabilityApproximateCertaintyStrong

This is a Latin word in Greek dress. Rome called the assessment of a province, and the tax rolls it produced, the "census," and Greek speakers simply borrowed the term. In the Gospels it no longer means the paperwork but the money: the tax a conquered people owed the emperor. Only Matthew and Mark use it, and its foreign sound carried its own message, since this was Rome's own word for Rome's own demand.

Two things separate it from the other tax words of the New Testament. It was charged directly on people and on what they owned, rather than skimmed off goods in transit, which is the work of the toll word (τέλος). And it was Rome's tax, not the temple's: the yearly due Jewish men paid for the sanctuary was a different payment with a different name (δίδραχμος). Luke tells the same tribute story using the ordinary Greek word for tribute (φόρος), most likely because his Greek was smoother and his readers sat further from a Roman tax office, not because he meant a different tax.

Most scholars identify this tax with the yearly charge Rome laid on each person in Judea once it became a province in 6 CE, the levy that provoked the revolt of Judas the Galilean. That history is why the question put to Jesus, whether it was lawful to pay it, was a trap and not a technical query: saying yes insulted a crowd who remembered that revolt, and saying no handed Rome a charge of stirring up rebellion. A minority of scholars read the word more narrowly, as the registering and valuing of property behind such taxes (ἀπογραφή is the word the New Testament uses for that registration), and doubt that any charge per head existed in Judea this early.

Nuances

1athe tax owed to Caesar: the yearly Roman levy on the people of Judea
Mat 22:17Mat 22:19Mrk 12:14
1bthe taxing of subjects in general, named beside the tolls that rulers collect
Mat 17:25

What scholars say about kēnsos

Every major lexicon treats κῆνσος as a transliteration of Latin census. LSJ gives two senses (the census itself; poll tax, citing Matt 17:25); BDAG glosses tax or poll tax across all four occurrences and notes the phrase τὸ νόμισμα τοῦ κήνσου in Matt 22:19; Louw and Nida file it in the domain of possession, transfer and exchange alongside φόρος and τέλος; Thayer defines it as the yearly capitation tax and cites Hesychius, who glossed it as a kind of coinage and a head tax (ἐπικεφάλαιον). Moulton and Milligan trace the earliest documentary attestation to a first-century BCE inscription from Bizye in Thrace, and the New Documents series (Horsley, vol. 3) adds inscriptions from Thyatira and Nicaea and later papyri naming the κηνσίτωρ, the census official: the Latinism travelled with Roman fiscal administration rather than with Greek literary usage. Wallace's study of Egyptian taxation supplies the standard parallel, since Egyptian documents call the poll tax λαογραφία while Matthew and Mark use the Latinism for the Judean tax that Luke renders φόρος. The majority of commentators (France, Davies and Allison, Hagner, Marcus, Yarbro Collins, Keener) identify the Gospel κῆνσος with the tributum capitis levied after the assessment conducted by Quirinius in 6 CE, which Josephus makes the seed of the revolt of Judas the Galilean (Ant. 18.1-10; JW 2.117-118) and which Tacitus corroborates as a live grievance in Syria and Judea in 17 CE (Ann. 2.42). Udoh dissents, arguing that the word denotes registration, that Quirinius assessed property rather than persons, and that the denarius detail is anachronistic given the scarcity of denarii in pre-70 Judea; Brunt and Millar reply that a regular census and capitation tax were general (if uneven) imperial practice whose documentation is simply patchy, and Carter judges the evidence suggestive but not decisive, while also reading the coin scene as largely Markan composition. Zeichmann builds on the same pericope to argue a post-70 date for Mark. The Latinism further figures in the debate over Mark's provenance, where Incigneri, Winn, Hengel and (cautiously) Marcus and Yarbro Collins favour Rome, while Cadbury, Roskam and Delgado Gómez observe that military, judicial and fiscal Latinisms accompanied Roman administration everywhere and are equally at home in Syria or post-war Palestine.

Where scholars disagree about kēnsos

What the word refers to in the tribute question: the yearly Roman charge on each person in Judea, or only the registration and assessment of property behind Roman taxation.

  • majorityIt names the direct annual tax Rome imposed once Judea became a province in 6 CE, paid in Roman coin and resented as a badge of subjection.; R. T. France, The Gospel of Matthew (NICNT, Eerdmans, 2007); W. D. Davies and Dale C. Allison, The Gospel According to Saint Matthew, vol. 3 (ICC, T&T Clark, 1997); Joel Marcus, Mark 8-16 (Anchor Yale Bible 27A, Yale University Press, 2009); Adela Yarbro Collins, Mark: A Commentary (Hermeneia, Fortress, 2007); P. A. Brunt, The Revenues of Rome, in Roman Imperial Themes (Clarendon Press, 1990), 332; Fergus Millar, The Roman Near East, 31 BC to AD 337 (Harvard University Press, 1993), 46, 110
  • minorityIt denotes registration rather than a charge per person, since no such charge is documented in Judea before 70 CE and the assessment under Quirinius fell on property.; Fabian E. Udoh, To Caesar What Is Caesar's: Tribute, Taxes, and Imperial Administration in Early Roman Palestine (Brown Judaic Studies 343, Brown University, 2005), ch. 5
In-depth research

This is a research paper, so it may be hard to read without scholarly background. It is useful if you want to dig even deeper into this word.

Sources

  • LSJ, s.v. κῆνσοςlexicon
  • BDAG, s.v. κῆνσοςlexicon
  • Louw and Nida, Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament Based on Semantic Domains, Domain 57lexicon
  • James Hope Moulton and George Milligan, The Vocabulary of the Greek Testament, s.v. κῆνσοςlexicon
  • G. H. R. Horsley, New Documents Illustrating Early Christianity, vol. 3 (Macquarie University, 1983), 70-71reference
  • Sherman LeRoy Wallace, Taxation in Egypt from Augustus to Diocletian (Princeton University Press, 1938)monograph
  • Fabian E. Udoh, To Caesar What Is Caesar's: Tribute, Taxes, and Imperial Administration in Early Roman Palestine (Brown Judaic Studies 343, Brown University, 2005), ch. 5monograph
  • P. A. Brunt, The Revenues of Rome, in Roman Imperial Themes (Clarendon Press, 1990), 332monograph
  • Fergus Millar, The Roman Near East, 31 BC to AD 337 (Harvard University Press, 1993), 46, 110monograph
  • R. T. France, The Gospel of Matthew (NICNT, Eerdmans, 2007)commentary
  • W. D. Davies and Dale C. Allison, The Gospel According to Saint Matthew, vol. 3 (ICC, T&T Clark, 1997)commentary
  • Donald A. Hagner, Matthew 14-28 (WBC 33B, Word, 1995)commentary
  • Joel Marcus, Mark 8-16 (Anchor Yale Bible 27A, Yale University Press, 2009)commentary
  • Adela Yarbro Collins, Mark: A Commentary (Hermeneia, Fortress, 2007)commentary
  • Warren Carter, The Things of Caesar: Mark-ing the Plural (Mk 12:13-17), HTS Theological Studies 70.1 (2014)article
  • Simeon R. Burke, Render to Caesar the Things of Caesar and to God the Things of God: Recent Perspectives on a Puzzling Command (1945 to Present), Currents in Biblical Research 16.2 (2018): 157-190article
  • Christopher B. Zeichmann, The Date of Mark's Gospel apart from the Temple and Rumors of War: The Taxation Episode (12:13-17) as Evidence, Catholic Biblical Quarterly 79 (2017): 422-437article
  • Christopher Bryan, Render to Caesar: Jesus, the Early Church, and the Roman Superpower (Oxford University Press, 2005)monograph
  • Josephus, Antiquities 18.1-10, 23; Jewish War 2.117-118primary source
  • Tacitus, Annals 2.42primary source

All attested forms of κῆνσος

accusative m s

κῆνσον

Mat 17:25, Mat 22:17, Mrk 12:14

genitive m s

κήνσου

Mat 22:19