StrongerBible

gnōsis

γνῶσις

GreekG1108knowledge, science

Appears 29 times · tap a cell to see the verses

Luk 1:77Luk 11:52Rom 2:20Rom 11:33Rom 15:141Co 1:51Co 8:1 (2×)1Co 8:71Co 8:101Co 8:111Co 12:81Co 13:21Co 13:81Co 14:62Co 2:142Co 4:62Co 6:62Co 8:72Co 10:52Co 11:6Eph 3:19Php 3:8Col 2:31Ti 6:201Pe 3:72Pe 1:52Pe 1:62Pe 3:18
Names & words formed with this
Word studyResearch-gradeGNOH-sisnoun

What gnōsis means

knowledge: a grasp of what is true, whether held in the mind, lived out, or given by God.

TranslatabilityDirectCertaintyStrong

The plain truth about this word is that it means knowledge, and almost nothing more specific than that until you read the sentence it sits in. It is the ordinary Greek word for knowing something, and outside the Bible it could mean anything from a scholar's understanding to a clerk's official report. So when New Testament writers reach for it, they are not pulling a loaded religious term off the shelf; they are using a flexible everyday word, and the surrounding words tell you what kind of knowing is meant.

That flexibility is why the same word can sit at opposite ends of the same letter. In one place Paul thanks God that the Corinthians are rich in knowledge; a few chapters later he warns that knowledge by itself only puffs people up while love builds them up. The word has not changed meaning. What changed is whether the knowledge is held with love or without it. Paul is never against knowing things; he claims this very gift for himself. What he attacks is knowledge cut loose from love and from the cross.

Across the New Testament the word ranges from God's own boundless knowing of his plans, to the saving recognition of who Jesus is, to a Spirit-given gift exercised in the church, to a status-symbol that the proud wield over weaker believers, to the false "knowledge" peddled by teachers the church should avoid. One word covers all of it, taking its color each time from what is being known, by whom, and for what end.

The single most useful caution is to resist the temptation to make this word carry one hidden deep meaning. It does not secretly mean a warm, relational, experiential knowing as opposed to cold head-knowledge, nor does it smuggle in a mystical or heretical sense. Where a passage means relational or saving knowing, the passage says so; the word itself is just the common word for knowledge.

Nuances

1athe knowledge of God or of Christ: the saving, life-changing recognition of who God is and what he has done.
Luk 1:772Co 2:142Co 4:62Co 10:5Eph 3:19Php 3:8Col 2:3
1bGod's own knowing: his deep, unsearchable understanding of his purposes.
Rom 11:33
1cknowledge as a good endowment of believers: a grasp of Christian truth that God gives and that the church is to grow in.
Rom 15:141Co 1:51Co 12:81Co 14:62Co 6:62Co 8:72Co 11:61Pe 3:72Pe 1:52Pe 1:62Pe 3:18
1dknowledge severed from love: a correct grasp of truth turned into a badge of superiority that wounds weaker believers.
1Co 8:1 (2×)1Co 8:71Co 8:101Co 8:111Co 13:21Co 13:8
1eknowledge as the visible deposit of truth in the Law, possessed yet not necessarily lived out.
Rom 2:20
1ffalse knowledge: the so-called knowledge of teachers the church should avoid, which only sounds like the real thing.
Luk 11:521Ti 6:20

What scholars say about gnōsis

The modern consensus, anchored in James Barr's Semantics of Biblical Language (1961), is that gnosis is an ordinary Greek word for knowledge whose sense is fixed by context, not by any built-in Hebraic or Gnostic essence; the standard lexica (BDAG, Louw-Nida, EDNT, NIDNTTE) follow suit and decline to lexicalize a special religious meaning for the New Testament. Two older framings have been substantially dismantled. The first, the Hebraic-versus-Greek contrast (dynamic, relational Hebrew yada against static, abstract Greek gnosis), classically given by Thorleif Boman, was undercut by Barr's exposure of illegitimate totality transfer and the conflation of "Greek thought" with Platonism; Stanley Porter applies this directly to Pauline usage. The second, the pre-Christian Gnostic redeemer-myth background associated with Bousset, Reitzenstein, and Bultmann, was shown by Carsten Colpe to be a modern composite of mostly late sources, and Edwin Yamauchi, Michael Williams, and Karen King have further dismantled both the background and the category "Gnosticism" itself. As a result the Corinthian "knowers" of 1 Corinthians 8 are now read as Hellenistic-Jewish wisdom elitists (so R. A. Horsley) rather than Gnostics, and the "falsely-named knowledge" of 1 Timothy 6:20 is read as a first-century proto-Gnostic phenomenon at most, not a developed second-century system (R. McL. Wilson's lowercase gnosis versus capital-G Gnosticism). On the often-preached gnosis/epignosis distinction, J. Armitage Robinson argued the prefix is directive rather than intensive, Bultmann judged the two largely indistinguishable, and Picirilli and the current lexica treat the difference as contextual.

Where scholars disagree about gnōsis

Whether the opponents whose "knowledge falsely so-called" 1 Timothy 6:20 condemns were early Gnostics, and more broadly whether any New Testament use of the word engages a pre-Christian Gnosticism.

  • majorityThe opponents are a first-century proto-Gnostic or Jewish-Christian speculative-ascetic phenomenon at most, exhibiting some features (elitist knowledge-claims, asceticism, denial of bodily resurrection) later visible in Gnosticism but lacking its developed second-century dualistic-demiurgic mythology; on this reading the New Testament does not engage a fully formed pre-Christian Gnostic system, since the supposed pre-Christian Gnostic background has been shown to be a modern scholarly composite of mostly later sources.; Carsten Colpe, Die religionsgeschichtliche Schule (1961); Edwin M. Yamauchi, Pre-Christian Gnosticism, 2nd ed. (1983); I. Howard Marshall, The Pastoral Epistles, ICC (Edinburgh, 1999); R. McL. Wilson, "Gnosis at Corinth," in Paul and Paulinism, ed. M. D. Hooker and S. G. Wilson (London, 1982)
  • minorityThe opponents are identifiably Jewish proto-Gnostic teachers, and several New Testament texts are best read against the rise of Gnostic thought; this position, once dominant via Bousset, Reitzenstein, and Bultmann, survives in a chastened form that identifies the targets as recognizably proto-Gnostic.; William D. Mounce, Pastoral Epistles, WBC (Nashville, 2000); George W. Knight III, The Pastoral Epistles, NIGTC (Grand Rapids, 1992)
In-depth research

This is a research paper, so it may be hard to read without scholarly background. It is useful if you want to dig even deeper into this word.

Sources

  • BDAG (Bauer-Danker-Arndt-Gingrich), A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament, 3rd ed. (2000), s.v. γνῶσις (p. 203)lexicon
  • LSJ (Liddell-Scott-Jones), A Greek-English Lexicon, 9th ed. (1940), s.v. γνῶσιςlexicon
  • Johannes P. Louw and Eugene A. Nida, Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament Based on Semantic Domains (1989), §§27.18, 28.1lexicon
  • Rudolf Bultmann, "γινώσκω κτλ.," TDNT 1:689-719, esp. 707dictionary
  • James Barr, The Semantics of Biblical Language (Oxford, 1961), ch. 8 and p. 218monograph
  • Moisés Silva, ed., New International Dictionary of New Testament Theology and Exegesis (NIDNTTE), 2nd ed. (2014), s.v. γινώσκωdictionary
  • Thorleif Boman, Hebrew Thought Compared with Greek (London, 1960; German 1954)monograph
  • Stanley E. Porter, "What Do We Mean by Speaking of Paul and Gnosis/Knowledge?," in Paul and Gnosis, Pauline Studies (Leiden: Brill)article
  • Carsten Colpe, Die religionsgeschichtliche Schule (Göttingen, 1961)monograph
  • Edwin M. Yamauchi, Pre-Christian Gnosticism: A Survey of the Proposed Evidences, 2nd ed. (Grand Rapids, 1983)monograph
  • Michael A. Williams, Rethinking "Gnosticism": An Argument for Dismantling a Dubious Category (Princeton, 1996)monograph
  • Karen L. King, What Is Gnosticism? (Cambridge, MA, 2003)monograph
  • Richard A. Horsley, "Gnosis in Corinth: 1 Corinthians 8.1-6," NTS 27 (1980): 32-51article
  • J. Armitage Robinson, St Paul's Epistle to the Ephesians (London, 1903), 248-254 ("Detached Note on ἐπίγνωσις")commentary
  • Robert E. Picirilli, "The Meaning of 'Epignosis,'" Evangelical Quarterly 47.2 (1975): 85-93article
  • Anthony C. Thiselton, The First Epistle to the Corinthians, NIGTC (Grand Rapids, 2000)commentary
  • Gordon D. Fee, The First Epistle to the Corinthians, NICNT, rev. ed. (Grand Rapids, 2014)commentary
  • Richard J. Bauckham, Jude, 2 Peter, WBC (Waco, 1983)commentary

All attested forms of γνῶσις

genitive f s

γνώσεως

Luk 11:52, Rom 2:20, Rom 11:33, Rom 15:14, 1Co 12:8, 2Co 2:14, 2Co 4:6, 2Co 10:5

dative f s

γνώσει

1Co 1:5, 1Co 8:11, 1Co 14:6, 2Co 6:6, 2Co 8:7, 2Co 11:6, 2Pe 1:6, 2Pe 3:18

accusative f s

γνῶσιν

Luk 1:77, 1Co 8:1, 1Co 8:10, 1Co 13:2, 1Pe 3:7, 2Pe 1:5

nominative f s

γνῶσις

1Co 8:1, 1Co 8:7, 1Co 13:8