StrongerBible

autos

αὐτός

GreekG0846him, his, ...

Appears 5870 times · tap a cell to see the verses

Mat 1:2Mat 1:11Mat 1:18 (2×)Mat 1:19 (2×)Mat 1:20 (2×)Mat 1:21 (4×)Mat 1:23Mat 1:24 (2×)Mat 1:25 (3×)Mat 2:2 (2×)Mat 2:3Mat 2:4Mat 2:5Mat 2:7Mat 2:8 (2×)Mat 2:9Mat 2:11 (4×)Mat 2:12Mat 2:13Mat 2:16Mat 2:18Mat 3:4Mat 3:5Mat 3:6Mat 3:7Mat 3:11Mat 3:14Mat 3:15 (2×)Mat 3:16 (2×)Mat 4:3Mat 4:5 (2×)Mat 4:6Mat 4:7Mat 4:8 (2×)Mat 4:11Mat 4:16Mat 4:19Mat 4:21 (3×)Mat 4:22Mat 4:23Mat 4:24Mat 5:2Mat 5:3Mat 5:15Mat 5:28 (2×)Mat 5:29Mat 6:1Mat 6:8 (2×)Mat 6:34Mat 7:6
Root family
Word studyResearch-gradeow-TOSSpronoun

What autos means

1

the everyday third person pronoun: him, her, it, them, and in the possessive his, her, its, their

TranslatabilityDirectCertaintySettled

This is what the word is doing four times out of five. A Greek verb already carries its own subject inside it, so a separate pronoun is needed mainly when the person is on the receiving end of the action or is the one something belongs to. That is where this word lives: "they brought him," "his disciples," "with them." Nothing is being pressed; it is simply the smoothest way to keep referring to someone already named.

Because it is so ordinary it is the third most common word in the New Testament, behind only "the" and "and." Mark leans on it hardest, in the fast, chained storytelling that keeps a run of "he ... him ... his" moving without repeating names.

One wrinkle sits underneath the English. Older Greek had a separate word for "his own" (ἑαυτοῦ), and in the everyday Greek of the New Testament period this word was steadily taking that job over as well. In two places our printed texts mark it as the contracted form that means "his own," which is why some English Bibles read "his own" there rather than "his." The mark that makes the difference was not written in the earliest manuscripts, so it is a modern editor's call.

Nuances

1ahim, her, it, them, or his, her, its, their: the plain way of pointing back to someone already named
Mat 1:2Mat 1:11Mat 1:18 (2×)Mat 1:19 (2×)Mat 1:20 (2×)Mat 1:21 (4×)Mat 1:23Mat 1:24 (2×)Mat 1:25 (3×)Mat 2:2 (2×)Mat 2:3Mat 2:4
1bstanding where "his own" is meant, doing the work an older, separate word used to do
Luk 9:1Act 10:21
2

used to single someone or something out: himself, herself, itself, in person, the very one

TranslatabilityApproximateCertaintyStrong

Greek puts the same word to a second job. Set beside a name or a noun, it stops merely referring and starts spotlighting: "the Lord himself" (1 Thessalonians 4:16), "God himself" (Revelation 21:3), "heaven itself" (Hebrews 9:24), "the Spirit himself" (Romans 8:16). The point is that this one, and no stand-in or messenger, is the one in view. The same trick works on things and on reasons, which is how Greek says "at that very hour" (Luke 13:1) and "for this very purpose" (Ephesians 6:22).

Standing alone as the subject it does the same work in less space: "he it is who will save his people" (Matthew 1:21), "he himself is our peace" (Ephesians 2:14). The Beatitudes run on this: "they shall be comforted," "they shall inherit the earth," where the Greek presses "they, and no others."

A third habit belongs to storytelling. A writer opens a clause with "and he" or "but he" as the scene turns to one person. Luke does this far more than anyone else, and scholars have argued for more than a century about whether it stresses anything at all, imitates the style of the Greek Old Testament, or simply marks the story moving to a new stage.

Nuances

2aset beside a person or thing to single it out: "the Lord himself," "heaven itself," "at that very hour"
Mrk 16:8Mrk 16:14Luk 2:38Luk 13:1Luk 24:15Luk 24:36Jhn 5:36Rom 8:16Rom 8:21Rom 8:26Rom 9:17Rom 13:6
2bstanding alone as the subject, stressing who is acting: "he it is who ..."
Mat 1:21 (4×)Mat 3:11Mat 5:4Mat 5:5Mat 5:6Mat 5:7Mat 5:8Mat 5:9Mat 8:17Mat 11:14Mat 12:3Mat 12:27
2copening a clause with "and he" or "but he" as the account turns to one person, a habit far more common in Luke than anywhere else
TranslatabilityPartialCertaintyContested
Mat 3:4Mat 8:24Mat 20:10Mat 21:27Mat 23:4Mat 25:17Mat 25:44Mat 27:57Mrk 1:8Mrk 2:25 (2×)Mrk 4:38Mrk 5:40
3

the same: one and the same person, thing, or place as the one already named

TranslatabilityApproximateCertaintySettled

When the Greek word for "the" stands directly in front of it, the word flips from "he" or "himself" to "the same": "the same words" (Matthew 26:44), "the same Lord" (1 Corinthians 12:5), "the same lump of clay" (Romans 9:21). The word itself does not change at all; only its place in the sentence does, and English has no way to show that, so a translation has already made the choice for you.

Paul builds a favorite appeal on it. "Think the same thing" runs through Romans 15:5, 2 Corinthians 13:11, and Philippians 2:2 and 4:2, and the drumbeat of 1 Corinthians 12, "the same Spirit ... the same Lord ... the same God," holds together a whole chapter about differing gifts.

Two uses stand apart from the rest:

  • Said of a person with nothing added, it means always the same, unchanging. Hebrews 1:12 applies to the Son a psalm addressed to God, "but you are the same," and Hebrews 13:8 says Jesus Christ is "the same yesterday and today and forever."
  • In a fixed little phrase, literally "at the same," it simply means "in one place, together": the believers gathered in Acts 1:15, 2:1, and 2:44, the two women grinding in Luke 17:35, and the church coming together in 1 Corinthians 11:20 and 14:23.

Nuances

3athe same one, the same thing, the same kind as what was just named
Mat 5:46Mat 5:47Mat 26:44Mrk 14:39Luk 6:23Luk 6:26Luk 6:33Luk 17:30Luk 23:40Act 15:27Rom 2:1Rom 9:21
3bsaid of a person on its own: always the same, unchanging
Heb 1:12Heb 13:8
3cin a fixed phrase, "at the same": in one place, together
TranslatabilityPartialCertaintyContested
Mat 22:34Luk 17:35Act 1:15Act 2:1Act 2:44Act 2:47Act 3:1Act 4:26Act 14:11Co 7:51Co 11:201Co 14:23

What scholars say about autos

Standard grammars from Smyth onward divide αὐτός into three uses distinguished by position: intensive in the predicate position (αὐτὸς ὁ ἄνθρωπος), identical in the attributive position (ὁ αὐτὸς ἄνθρωπος), and, in the oblique cases standing alone, the ordinary third person pronoun. BDF, Wallace and BDAG follow the same division. The oblique pronominal use is uncontroversial and is documented from Classical Greek into the Koine papyri (Mayser, Gignac, Moulton and Milligan). The live question is the nominative. Thayer, following Buttmann, held that contrary to earlier Greek usage the New Testament nominative can stand for a simple unemphatic third person pronoun, citing Colossians 1:17 among others; Turner explained the same data as a Semitism mediated by Septuagintal style rendering Hebrew הוּא (compare Conybeare and Stock on the superfluous pronoun), while Moulton, following Deissmann and the documentary papyri, held the construction to be ordinary vernacular Greek whose inordinate frequency in Luke is the only Semitic residue. Fitzmyer classes Lukan καὶ αὐτός among Septuagintisms rather than translation Aramaic, and Cadbury treats it as Luke's own literary habit. Discourse linguists (Levinsohn, Runge) reframe emphasis as topical framing, focus and over-specification marking discontinuity, so that an apparently redundant pronoun is thematically meaningful rather than empty. The choice between reflexive αὑτοῦ and possessive αὐτοῦ is an editorial decision, since breathings were unwritten in the earliest manuscripts (Robertson; BDF §277). On ὁ αὐτός in Hebrews 1:12 and 13:8, Attridge, Ellingworth, Koester and Lane read the Psalm 102 citation as transferring creator language to the Son, though the reach of the claim in 13:8 is debated. For ἐπὶ τὸ αὐτό in Acts, Ferguson, Barrett and Fitzmyer discuss whether the phrase is hardening into a quasi technical designation of the assembled congregation, a suggestion the evidence supports without settling; Acts 2:47 carries a textual complication as well (Metzger). Over the longer history the word drifts toward the demonstrative of Modern Greek, a development Manolessou dates well after the New Testament period.

Where scholars disagree about autos

Whether the subject form of this pronoun can ever be a plain, unstressed "he," or always carries some force.

  • contestedIn the New Testament, contrary to earlier Greek usage, the subject form can stand for a simple unemphatic third person pronoun, as at Colossians 1:17 and in passages in Galatians, Ephesians and 1 John.; Joseph Henry Thayer, A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament, s.v. αὐτός; Alexander Buttmann, A Grammar of the New Testament Greek, trans. J. H. Thayer (Andover: Draper, 1873), pp. 107ff.
  • contestedThe unstressed subject form, and the recurring "and he" that opens clauses in Luke, are Semitisms carried into the New Testament through the Greek of the Septuagint, which used the pronoun to render the Hebrew unemphatic "he."; Nigel Turner, A Grammar of New Testament Greek, vol. III: Syntax (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1963); F. C. Conybeare and St. George Stock, A Grammar of Septuagint Greek (Boston: Ginn, 1905), §13
  • contestedThe construction is ordinary spoken Greek of the period, and only its unusual frequency in Luke betrays biblical coloring; an apparently extra pronoun still does real work, marking a change of subject or the start of a new episode rather than adding emphasis.; James Hope Moulton, A Grammar of New Testament Greek, vol. I: Prolegomena, 3rd ed. (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1908); Stephen H. Levinsohn, Discourse Features of New Testament Greek, 2nd ed. (Dallas: SIL International, 2000); Steven E. Runge, Discourse Grammar of the Greek New Testament (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 2010)
In-depth research

This is a research paper, so it may be hard to read without scholarly background. It is useful if you want to dig even deeper into this word.

Sources

  • Herbert Weir Smyth, A Greek Grammar for Colleges (New York: American Book Company, 1920), §§1204-1206grammar
  • F. Blass and A. Debrunner, A Greek Grammar of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature, trans. and rev. R. W. Funk (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1961), §§277, 288grammar
  • Daniel B. Wallace, Greek Grammar Beyond the Basics (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1996), pp. 348-50grammar
  • BDAG, s.v. αὐτόςlexicon
  • Joseph Henry Thayer, A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament, s.v. αὐτόςlexicon
  • Alexander Buttmann, A Grammar of the New Testament Greek, trans. J. H. Thayer (Andover: Draper, 1873), pp. 107ff.grammar
  • Nigel Turner, A Grammar of New Testament Greek, vol. III: Syntax (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1963)grammar
  • James Hope Moulton, A Grammar of New Testament Greek, vol. I: Prolegomena, 3rd ed. (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1908)grammar
  • Stephen H. Levinsohn, Discourse Features of New Testament Greek, 2nd ed. (Dallas: SIL International, 2000)monograph
  • Steven E. Runge, Discourse Grammar of the Greek New Testament (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 2010)grammar
  • Joseph A. Fitzmyer, The Gospel According to Luke I-IX, Anchor Bible 28 (Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1981)commentary
  • Henry J. Cadbury, The Style and Literary Method of Luke (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1919)monograph
  • F. C. Conybeare and St. George Stock, A Grammar of Septuagint Greek (Boston: Ginn, 1905), §§13, 66grammar
  • A. T. Robertson, A Grammar of the Greek New Testament in the Light of Historical Research, 4th ed. (Nashville: Broadman, 1934)grammar
  • Harold W. Attridge, The Epistle to the Hebrews, Hermeneia (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1989)commentary
  • Paul Ellingworth, The Epistle to the Hebrews, NIGTC (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1993)commentary
  • William L. Lane, Hebrews 9-13, Word Biblical Commentary 47B (Dallas: Word, 1991)commentary
  • C. K. Barrett, The Acts of the Apostles, ICC, 2 vols. (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1994-1998)commentary
  • Bruce M. Metzger, A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament, 2nd ed. (Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft, 1994)textual-commentary
  • Donald A. Hagner, Matthew 1-13, Word Biblical Commentary 33A (Dallas: Word, 1993)commentary
  • Io Manolessou, "The Evolution of the Demonstrative System in Greek," Journal of Greek Linguistics 2 (2001): 119-148journal-article
  • Geoffrey Horrocks, Greek: A History of the Language and Its Speakers, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010)monograph
  • Catrin H. Williams, I Am He: The Interpretation of Ani Hu in Jewish and Early Christian Literature (Tubingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2000)monograph
  • Anneli Aejmelaeus, On the Trail of the Septuagint Translators (Kampen: Kok Pharos, 1993)monograph

All attested forms of αὐτός

genitive m s

αὐτοῦ, αὐτου, αὑτοῦ

Mat 1:2, Mat 1:11, Mat 1:18, Mat 1:20, Mat 1:21, Mat 1:21, Mat 1:23, Mat 1:24

accusative m s

αὐτὸν, αὐτόν, αὑτὸν

Mat 3:5, Mat 3:14, Mat 4:5, Mat 4:5, Mat 4:8, Mat 4:11, Mat 5:15, Mat 5:29

dative m s

αὐτῷ

Mat 1:20, Mat 1:24, Mat 2:2, Mat 2:5, Mat 2:8, Mat 2:11, Mat 2:11, Mat 3:16

dative m p

αὐτοῖς

Mat 3:7, Mat 4:16, Mat 4:19, Mat 6:1, Mat 6:8, Mat 7:12, Mat 7:23, Mat 8:4

genitive m p

αὐτῶν, Αὐτῶν

Mat 1:21, Mat 2:4, Mat 2:7, Mat 2:11, Mat 2:12, Mat 2:13, Mat 3:6, Mat 4:21

accusative m p

αὐτοὺς, αὐτούς

Mat 1:18, Mat 2:8, Mat 2:9, Mat 5:2, Mat 7:6, Mat 7:26, Mat 7:29, Mat 12:15

nominative m s

αὐτὸς, αὐτός, Αὐτὸς

Mat 1:21, Mat 3:11, Mat 8:17, Mat 8:24, Mat 12:3, Mat 14:2, Mat 25:17, Mat 27:57

genitive f s

αὐτῆς

Mat 1:19, Mat 1:25, Mat 2:16, Mat 2:18, Mat 6:34, Mat 7:13, Mat 7:27, Mat 8:15

accusative f s

αὐτὴν, αὐτήν

Mat 1:19, Mat 1:25, Mat 5:28, Mat 5:28, Mat 5:30, Mat 5:32, Mat 8:15, Mat 9:22

dative f s

αὐτῇ

Mat 1:20, Mat 5:31, Mat 10:11, Mat 12:39, Mat 14:7, Mat 15:23, Mat 15:28, Mat 16:4

accusative n s

αὐτὸ, αὐτό

Mat 5:46, Mat 5:47, Mat 12:11, Mat 18:2, Mat 26:29, Mat 26:42, Mat 27:44, Mat 27:59

nominative m p

αὐτοὶ, αὐτοί, Αὐτοὶ

Mat 5:4, Mat 5:5, Mat 5:6, Mat 5:7, Mat 5:8, Mat 5:9, Mat 12:27, Mat 23:4

accusative n p

αὐτὰ, αὐτά

Mat 10:1, Mat 11:25, Mat 13:30, Mat 19:14, Mat 27:6, Mat 27:10, Mrk 5:10, Mrk 8:7

genitive n s

αὐτοῦ, τοῦ

Mat 9:16, Mat 12:33, Mat 12:33, Mat 12:36, Mat 13:32, Mat 23:18, Mat 23:20, Mat 23:26

genitive n p

αὐτῶν

Mat 6:26, Mat 10:29, Mat 11:16, Mat 18:12, Mat 20:25, Mat 20:25, Mat 21:7, Mat 27:7

dative n s

αὐτῷ

Mat 18:13, Mat 23:20, Mrk 5:8, Mrk 9:25, Luk 6:38, Luk 19:45, Luk 23:40, Jhn 11:38

genitive f p

αὐτῶν

Mat 4:8, Mat 25:2, Mat 25:3, Mat 25:4, Mat 25:10, Mat 28:11, Luk 4:2, Luk 4:6

dative f p

αὐταῖς

Mat 28:9, Mat 28:10, Mrk 16:6, Luk 8:3, Luk 13:14, Luk 24:1, Luk 24:4, Luk 24:10

dative n p

αὐτοῖς

Mat 19:13, Mat 19:13, Mat 19:15, Mat 25:16, Mat 25:20, Mat 25:22, Mrk 5:13, Luk 8:31

accusative f p

αὐτὰς, αὐτάς

Mrk 16:8, Luk 23:28, Luk 24:4, Jhn 2:7, Jhn 11:19, Heb 10:11, Heb 11:13, Jud 1:7

nominative f s

αὐτὴ

Mrk 10:12, Luk 1:36, Luk 2:37, Luk 7:12, Luk 8:42, Rom 8:21, Rom 16:2, 1Co 11:14

nominative n s

αὐτὸ

Luk 11:14, Rom 8:16, Rom 8:26, 1Co 3:13, 1Co 11:5, 1Co 12:4, 1Co 12:11, 2Co 3:14

nominative n p

αὐτὰ

Jhn 5:36