StrongerBible

sharash

שָׁרַשׁ

HebrewH8327take root, root out, ...

Appears 8 times · tap a cell to see the verses

Job 5:3Job 31:8Job 31:12Psa 52:5(7)Psa 80:9(10)Isa 27:6Isa 40:24Jer 12:2
Root family
Word studyshah-RAHSHverb

What sharash means

1

to take root: to send roots down into the soil and get a firm hold, or to give a plant its roots so that it holds

TranslatabilityApproximateCertaintySettled

This is the verb that belongs to the noun for a root (שֹׁרֶשׁ). To do it is to put roots down: a vine spreads them out under the ground, grips the soil, and only then starts to thrive. Planting is only half of the story in Hebrew. Someone else does the planting, but the plant itself has to root, and until it has, nothing about its future is safe.

Almost every time, the plant in view is a person or a nation:

  • a vine carried out of Egypt whose roots go deep until it fills the land (Psalm 80:9)
  • a people who will root, blossom, and cover the whole world with fruit (Isaiah 27:6)
  • the wicked whom God himself planted, now rooted and bearing fruit, which is exactly what makes the prophet complain (Jeremiah 12:2)
  • a fool seen settling in comfortably, right before his home is cursed (Job 5:3)
  • rulers whose stock barely gets a grip in the ground before a breath of wind withers them (Isaiah 40:24)

So the word carries hope and warning equally well. Rooting is what security looks like from the outside, and the writers use it both for the real thing that God gives and for the false version that a fool or a tyrant seems to have for a while. One passage turns the verb around: God does not merely watch a vine root, he clears the ground and makes its roots take hold, which is a stronger claim than planting on its own.

Nuances

1ato take root: to send roots down and become established, said of a plant and of the people or rulers pictured as one
Job 5:3Isa 27:6Isa 40:24Jer 12:2
1bto give something its roots: to settle a plant, or a people, so that its roots take hold and it cannot easily be shifted
Psa 80:9(10)
2

to root out: to tear something out of the ground roots and all, so that it cannot grow back

TranslatabilityApproximateCertaintySettled

The same verb, turned around, means the opposite of taking root: not giving roots but taking them away. Hebrew can build a verb from a noun and then use it either way, much as English "to dust" can mean putting dust on something or getting dust off it. Nobody reading Hebrew is confused by this, because the sentence settles it: what is planted, watered, and fruitful is rooting, and what is being burned, torn out, or removed from the land is being rooted out.

What this verb removes does not come back. Fire eats a man's harvest all the way down (Job 31:12), his children are ripped out of the ground where they grew (Job 31:8), and a smooth talker is dragged out of his tent and out of the land of the living (Psalm 52:5). The point in each case is not damage but removal at the source, the one kind of loss a farmer cannot recover from by waiting.

That makes it a strong word for judgment, and a deliberate reversal: a people God planted and rooted can be unrooted by the same hand. Other Hebrew verbs say "pull up" more bluntly (compare נָתַשׁ and עָקַר); this one says it while still holding the picture of the roots themselves in view.

Job 31:8Job 31:12Psa 52:5(7)

What scholars say about sharash

The lexica treat שָׁרַשׁ as a single denominative verb from the noun שֹׁרֶשׁ "root", whose derived stems carry opposite values. BDB lists Piel "take root" (Isa 40:24) alongside Piel "root out" (Ps 52:7 Hebrew, English 52:5; Job 31:12), Pual "be rooted" (Jer 12:2) and "be rooted out" (Job 31:8), and Hiphil "take root, cause to take root" (Isa 27:6; Ps 80:10 Hebrew, English 80:9; Job 5:3). HALOT and DCH give the same inventory and the same distribution of the eight attestations, and TWOT treats the verb under the noun. The removal sense is the standard textbook example of the so-called privative Piel, in which the verb takes away what the base noun names; Waltke and O'Connor discuss it under that heading, while Jenni's monograph on the Piel argued that a privative category is not genuinely required and analysed such forms as resultative instead. That grammatical argument concerns how the two values arise, not what the verb means in any given verse: the eight occurrences are read the same way across the lexica. Two texts are debated on other grounds. In Isa 27:6 the subject of the Hiphil is disputed, so translations divide between "Jacob will take root" and "he will cause Jacob to take root". In Job 31:12 the verb is construed with בְּ before תְּבוּאָה, which some read as consuming down to the root of the produce rather than tearing the produce out.

Sources

  • BDB, s.v. שָׁרַשׁlexicon
  • HALOT, s.v. שׁרשׁlexicon
  • DCH, s.v. שׁרשׁlexicon
  • TWOT, entry on שׁרשׁtheological-dictionary
  • Bruce K. Waltke and M. O'Connor, An Introduction to Biblical Hebrew Syntax (Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns, 1990), on the privative Pielgrammar
  • Ernst Jenni, Das hebräische Pi'el: Syntaktisch-semasiologische Untersuchung einer Verbalform im Alten Testament (Zürich: EVZ-Verlag, 1968)monograph

All attested forms of שָׁרַשׁ

hiphil consecutive-imperfect 3fs

וַתַּשְׁרֵשׁ

Psa 80:9

hiphil jussive 3ms

יַשְׁרֵשׁ

Isa 27:6

hiphil participle m s absolute

מַשְׁרִישׁ

Job 5:3

piel consecutive-perfect 3ms

וְשֵׁרֶשְׁ

Psa 52:5

piel imperfect 3fs

תְשָׁרֵשׁ

Job 31:12

piel perfect 3ms

שֹׁרֵשׁ

Isa 40:24

pual imperfect 3mp

יְשֹׁרָשׁוּ

Job 31:8

pual perfect 3cp

שֹׁרָשׁוּ

Jer 12:2