StrongerBible

iqqer

עִקֵּר

HebrewH6131uproot, hamstring, ...

Appears 7 times · tap a cell to see the verses

Gen 49:6Jos 11:6Jos 11:92Sa 8:41Ch 18:4Ecc 3:2Zep 2:4
Root family
Word studyResearch-gradeah-KAHRverb

What iqqer means

1

to pull something out by the roots: to grub a plant out of the ground, or to tear a town out of its place for good

TranslatabilityDirectCertaintySettled

When a farmer pulls a plant up, the roots come with it. That is the picture here. This is not cutting a stalk off at ground level, which leaves a stump that can sprout again, but taking the whole thing out of the soil so that nothing is left to grow back.

Ecclesiastes uses the word in its plainest setting, pairing it with planting inside a long list of opposites that together cover the whole of a life. Zephaniah stretches the same picture over a city, because a town can be torn out of its place as thoroughly as a vine out of a field. Hebrew has a weightier word for that kind of judgment, and the prophets usually reach for נָתַשׁ when they announce that God will pull a nation out of its land. This word stays closer to the garden.

The same image lies behind the related adjective for a woman or animal that bears no young (עָקָר): a family line pictured as cut off at the root, with nothing growing up from it.

Nuances

1ato grub a plant out of the ground, roots and all, the way a farmer clears out spent stock
Ecc 3:2
1bof a town: to be torn out of its place and left in ruins
Zep 2:4
2

to cripple an animal on purpose by cutting the large tendon at the back of its leg

TranslatabilityApproximateCertaintySettled

An army that captured horses and chariots could not always keep them, and killing the animals was not the only option. Cutting the large tendon at the back of a horse's hind leg left it alive but permanently useless in battle. That is what this word names: a deliberate, irreversible crippling, done to an animal rather than to a person.

The Bible weighs the act three different ways.

  • In Jacob's deathbed poem it is an outburst of blind rage, and he curses it.
  • In Joshua's northern campaign God commands it, so that Israel will not start trusting captured chariots instead of trusting him.
  • After David defeats Hadadezer he does it to nearly every captured chariot team but holds a hundred back, and the narrator lets that exception stand without comment.

What ties this to the other meaning is the idea of a root. The tendon sits where the leg joins and draws its strength, the root of the limb, so cutting there is its own kind of uprooting.

Gen 49:6Jos 11:6Jos 11:92Sa 8:41Ch 18:4
Gen 49:6

What Genesis 49:6 says Simeon and Levi maimed, and therefore what this verb governs there.

  • majorityThe received Hebrew text is right: the object is an ox, and the line condemns the wanton maiming of animals.; John Skinner, Genesis, ICC, 2nd ed. (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1930), on 49:6; Claus Westermann, Genesis 37-50, Continental Commentary (Minneapolis: Augsburg, 1986), on 49:6; Gordon J. Wenham, Genesis 16-50, WBC 2 (Dallas: Word, 1994), on 49:6; Victor P. Hamilton, The Book of Genesis: Chapters 18-50, NICOT (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1995), on 49:6
  • minorityThe word "ox" is a poetic figure for a warrior chieftain, matching the parallel line about killing a man.; Hermann Gunkel, Genesis, trans. Mark E. Biddle (Macon, GA: Mercer University Press, 1997), on 49:6; Nahum M. Sarna, Genesis, JPS Torah Commentary (Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society, 1989), on 49:6; Bruce K. Waltke, Genesis: A Commentary (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2001), on 49:6
  • minorityThe consonants should be read as "wall" rather than "ox", with the Aramaic, Syriac and Latin versions, since maiming captured oxen would have been pointless.; Robert Alter, The Five Books of Moses: A Translation with Commentary (New York: Norton, 2004), on 49:6; John Bowker, The Targums and Rabbinic Literature (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969), on Genesis 49:6

What scholars say about iqqer

The lexicons formally divide the verb. BDB lists a Qal/Niphal עָקַר "pluck or root up" alongside a separate Piel עִקֵּר "hamstring" derived from a reconstructed noun *עֵקַר "root-sinew", and HALOT, DCH, TWOT (§§1681-1682) and Gesenius (18th ed.) all list עקר I and עקר II. Van Dam (NIDOTTE) argues instead for one polysemous root anchored in the noun עִקָּר "root, stump, base", with the adjective עָקָר "barren" belonging to the same field; Jastrow takes the same unified view for rabbinic Hebrew. Kogan (in Weninger, ed., The Semitic Languages) proposes that the hamstringing verb is historically distinct, possibly a metathesized reflex of *ʿrq lying behind Arabic ʿurqūb and Aramaic ʿarqūbā "hock", which would justify the traditional split on historical grounds even though Second Temple speakers plainly felt the senses as one. Comparative support for the hamstringing sense is strongest in Arabic: Lane records Form I ʿaqara "he hocked, houghed, or hamstrung a beast", the verb of the Thamud she-camel narrative, and Wellhausen (Reste arabischen Heidentums) connected the Israelite practice to Arab funerary laming of a warrior's mount. The Septuagint differentiates consistently, reserving νευροκοπέω (Muraoka, GELS: "cut the sinew") for the hamstringing passages while using ἐκτίλλω at Qoh 3:2 and ἐκριζόω at Zeph 2:4. On Josh 11:6, 9 the commentators (Butler, Nelson, Hess, Woudstra, Dozeman) read the hamstringing as a Deuteronomistic enactment of Deut 17:16; on 2 Sam 8:4 McCarter, Anderson and Firth follow LXX Samuel and MT Chronicles for the numerals and divide over whether the hundred retained chariots is an ominous anticipation of Solomon. On Zeph 2:4 Berlin, Sweeney, Ben Zvi and Roberts treat עֶקְרוֹן תֵּעָקֵר as opportunistic wordplay on sound, the toponym itself being non-Semitic (Neo-Assyrian Amqar(r)ūna).

Where scholars disagree about iqqer

Whether this is one word with two applications or two unrelated words that ended up spelled alike.

  • majorityTwo separate verbs, listed as separate entries: one meaning "to uproot" and one meaning "to hamstring".; HALOT, s.v. עקר I, עקר II; BDB, s.v. עקר; David J. A. Clines, ed., The Dictionary of Classical Hebrew, s.v. עקר; TWOT §§1681-1682, s.v. עקר
  • minorityOne word built on the noun for "root": to uproot is to take a plant out at its root, and to hamstring is to cut at the root of the leg.; Cornelis Van Dam, "עקר," in NIDOTTE, ed. Willem A. VanGemeren (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1997); Marcus Jastrow, A Dictionary of the Targumim, the Talmud Babli and Yerushalmi, and the Midrashic Literature, s.v. עקר
  • minorityThe hamstringing verb is historically a different root, tied to the word for the hock tendon, that only came to sound like the word for root.; Leonid Kogan, "Proto-Semitic Lexicon," in The Semitic Languages: An International Handbook, ed. Stefan Weninger (Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 2011)
In-depth research

This is a research paper, so it may be hard to read without scholarly background. It is useful if you want to dig even deeper into this word.

Sources

  • BDB, s.v. עקרlexicon
  • HALOT, s.v. עקר I, עקר IIlexicon
  • David J. A. Clines, ed., The Dictionary of Classical Hebrew, s.v. עקרlexicon
  • Cornelis Van Dam, "עקר," in NIDOTTE, ed. Willem A. VanGemeren (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1997)theological-dictionary
  • TWOT §§1681-1682, s.v. עקרtheological-dictionary
  • Leonid Kogan, "Proto-Semitic Lexicon," in The Semitic Languages: An International Handbook, ed. Stefan Weninger (Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 2011)article
  • Edward William Lane, An Arabic-English Lexicon (London: Williams and Norgate, 1863-1893), I.2109lexicon
  • Julius Wellhausen, Reste arabischen Heidentums, 2nd ed. (Berlin: Reimer, 1897), 181monograph
  • Takamitsu Muraoka, A Greek-English Lexicon of the Septuagint (Leuven: Peeters, 2009), s.v. νευροκοπέωlexicon
  • Richard D. Nelson, Joshua, OTL (Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 1997), on 11:6-9commentary
  • Marten H. Woudstra, The Book of Joshua, NICOT (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1981), on 11:6commentary
  • P. Kyle McCarter Jr., II Samuel, Anchor Bible 9 (Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1984), on 8:4commentary
  • A. A. Anderson, 2 Samuel, WBC 11 (Dallas: Word, 1989), on 8:4commentary
  • C. L. Seow, Ecclesiastes, Anchor Bible 18C (New York: Doubleday, 1997), on 3:2commentary
  • Michael V. Fox, A Time to Tear Down and a Time to Build Up: A Rereading of Ecclesiastes (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1999)monograph
  • Adele Berlin, Zephaniah, Anchor Bible 25A (New York: Doubleday, 1994), on 2:4commentary
  • Marvin A. Sweeney, Zephaniah, Hermeneia (Minneapolis: Fortress, 2003), on 2:4commentary
  • Ehud Ben Zvi, A Historical-Critical Study of the Book of Zephaniah, BZAW 198 (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1991)monograph

All attested forms of עִקֵּר

piel consecutive-imperfect 3ms

וַיְעַקֵּר

2Sa 8:4, 1Ch 18:4

niphal imperfect 3fs

תֵּעָקֵר

Zep 2:4

piel imperfect 2ms

תְּעַקֵּר

Jos 11:6

piel perfect 3cp

עִקְּרוּ

Gen 49:6

piel perfect 3ms

עִקֵּר

Jos 11:9

qal infinitive-construct construct

עֲקוֹר

Ecc 3:2