StrongerBible

sheqets

שֶׁקֶץ

HebrewH8263detestable thing, abomination, ...

Appears 11 times · tap a cell to see the verses

Lev 7:21Lev 11:10Lev 11:11Lev 11:12Lev 11:13Lev 11:20Lev 11:23Lev 11:41Lev 11:42Isa 66:17Ezk 8:10
Root family
Word studySHEH-ketsnoun

What sheqets means

a detestable creature: an animal the law puts off-limits, to be met with open disgust and not merely kept at a distance

TranslatabilityPartialCertaintyStrong

This is the sharpest word the food laws use for a forbidden animal. Israel is not simply told that certain creatures are off the menu. Israel is told to find them repulsive. The noun and the verb built from the same root stand side by side in Leviticus 11:11, where the same creatures are declared detestable and then handed over to be detested.

The creatures it covers are a specific set, and they share a family resemblance:

  • water animals that have no fins and scales
  • birds of prey, headed by the eagle and the vulture
  • winged insects that go about on four legs
  • everything that crawls along the ground

These are the creatures that do not move the way their part of the world is expected to move, and the law fences all of them off with one blunt word.

Two passages outside the food laws keep the focus on animals but turn the word into an accusation. Isaiah names a group who purify themselves for a garden ritual and then sit down to pig, vermin, and the detestable thing. Ezekiel is shown crawling things and detestable beasts carved around the walls of the temple itself. In both, Israel has taken up the very creatures it was told to loathe.

The word stays close to its neighbors without collapsing into them. The ordinary word for ritually unclean (טָמֵא) marks a status, a condition that shuts a thing out of worship until it is put right; this word adds the revulsion that status is meant to produce. A close relative from the same root (שִׁקּוּץ) moves the disgust onto idols and pagan equipment, and the broadest term of the group (תּוֹעֵבָה) stretches to cover anything God hates, from crooked scales to false worship.

Nuances

1athe food laws' ruling on a whole class of creatures: not to be eaten, and to be treated as repulsive
Lev 11:10Lev 11:11Lev 11:12Lev 11:13Lev 11:20Lev 11:23Lev 11:41Lev 11:42
1ba detestable creature as a carrier of uncleanness, so that touching one shuts a person out of the shared holy meal
Lev 7:21
Lev 7:21

Whether the Masoretic שֶׁקֶץ or the versional שֶׁרֶץ is the original reading at Leviticus 7:21.

  • contestedThe Masoretic שֶׁקֶץ is original: the verse widens the catalogue of defiling contacts beyond the swarming creatures proper, and the lexicons list the occurrence under this lemma without emendation.; HALOT, s.v. שֶׁקֶץ; BDB, s.v. שֶׁקֶץ
  • contestedThe reading שֶׁרֶץ, attested by the Samaritan Pentateuch and the ancient versions, is original, and שֶׁקֶץ arose by assimilation to the vocabulary of Leviticus 11.; Jacob Milgrom, Leviticus 1-16 (Anchor Bible 3; New York: Doubleday, 1991)
1ca detestable creature taken up in false worship, whether eaten in a forbidden rite or carved as an image
Isa 66:17Ezk 8:10

What scholars say about sheqets

The lexicons treat שֶׁקֶץ as a noun from the root שׁקץ, paired with the intensive verb שִׁקֵּץ "to treat as detestable" (BDB, s.v.; HALOT, s.v.; DCH, s.v.). Its distribution is concentrated in the Priestly dietary legislation of Leviticus 11, where it functions as a declaratory formula, שֶׁקֶץ הוּא לָכֶם, parallel in force to the טָמֵא verdicts of the same chapter but reserved for the most repugnant classes: the swarmers of water and air, the raptors, and the ground-crawlers. Milgrom (Leviticus 1-16, Anchor Bible) reads it as a graded intensification above ordinary טֻמְאָה and stresses that the paired verb imposes an affective duty rather than a bare prohibition; Wenham (The Book of Leviticus, NICOT) and Houston (Purity and Monotheism, JSOTSup 140) relate the classification to anomalous locomotion within the created spheres. Commentators consistently distinguish the term from the phonologically close שִׁקּוּץ, which the prophets reserve for idols and cult apparatus, and from the far wider field of תּוֹעֵבָה. The Septuagint renders it with βδέλυγμα and βδελυκτός, the lexical bridge by which Levitical revulsion enters the New Testament vocabulary of abomination. Two occurrences carry text-critical weight: at Leviticus 7:21 the Masoretic שֶׁקֶץ stands against the versional שֶׁרֶץ, and at Ezekiel 8:10 the sequence רֶמֶשׂ וּבְהֵמָה שֶׁקֶץ is syntactically awkward, with commentators divided over whether the noun qualifies the animals or entered as an explanatory gloss (Zimmerli, Ezekiel 1, Hermeneia; Block, The Book of Ezekiel 1-24, NICOT).

Sources

  • HALOT, s.v. שֶׁקֶץlexicon
  • BDB, s.v. שֶׁקֶץlexicon
  • DCH, s.v. שֶׁקֶץlexicon
  • Jacob Milgrom, Leviticus 1-16 (Anchor Bible 3; New York: Doubleday, 1991)commentary
  • Gordon J. Wenham, The Book of Leviticus (NICOT; Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1979)commentary
  • Walther Zimmerli, Ezekiel 1 (Hermeneia; Philadelphia: Fortress, 1979)commentary
  • Daniel I. Block, The Book of Ezekiel, Chapters 1-24 (NICOT; Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1997)commentary
  • Walter Houston, Purity and Monotheism: Clean and Unclean Animals in Biblical Law (JSOTSup 140; Sheffield: JSOT Press, 1993)monograph
  • TDOT, s.v. שׁקץdictionary

All attested forms of שֶׁקֶץ

m s absolute

שֶׁקֶץ, שֶּׁקֶץ

Lev 7:21, Lev 11:10, Lev 11:11, Lev 11:12, Lev 11:13, Lev 11:20, Lev 11:23, Lev 11:41