StrongerBible

piggul

פִּגּוּל

HebrewH6292abomination, foul thing, ...

Appears 4 times · tap a cell to see the verses

Lev 7:18Lev 19:7Isa 65:4Ezk 4:14
Word studyResearch-gradepig-GOOLnoun

What piggul means

foul, rejected meat: consecrated or forbidden flesh that has become desecrated and unfit to eat or offer

TranslatabilityPartialCertaintyStrong

Piggul is a rare, technical word from Israel's priestly vocabulary, turning up only four times in the whole Bible. At its core it names foul, rejected flesh: meat that has become desecrated and unfit, something once holy or edible that has crossed a line and turned taboo. Its origin is genuinely unknown, so scholars reconstruct its sense from the four places it appears rather than from any secure root.

In Leviticus the word is tied to one specific rule. The meat of a fellowship offering could be eaten on the day it was sacrificed and the next day; whatever was left by the third day had to be burned. If someone ate it on the third day instead, the meat was piggul: the offering was cancelled, counted as worthless to the worshipper, and the person who ate it bore the guilt. Consecrated flesh, in other words, had a shelf life of holiness, and eating it past that point did not merely spoil it but desecrated it.

The two prophets use the word more loosely. Ezekiel, himself a priest, lists "foul flesh" beside meat from animals that died on their own (נְבֵלָה) and animals torn by beasts (טְרֵפָה), as a class of disgusting, forbidden food he had never eaten. Isaiah uses a plural, "foul things," for what fills the vessels of people who practice secret, illicit rites. Scholars read these not as a different word but as the same term stretched past the narrow sacrificial rule to mean foul, abhorrent food of any kind.

Most modern scholars take the offense in Leviticus to be the actual eating of holy meat past its time, which leaves the meat desecrated and foul. A famous later Jewish legal tradition instead defined piggul as a sacrifice ruined by the priest's improper intention, formed silently during the ritual, rather than by anyone eating it late. That reading became central to rabbinic law, but it is a later development, and the tradition itself admits it departs from the plain sense of the verses.

Nuances

1athe meat of a fellowship offering eaten past its permitted day, so that it is rejected and desecrated and the offering is cancelled
Lev 7:18Lev 19:7
1bfoul, abhorrent flesh more broadly: forbidden or disgusting food outside the narrow sacrificial rule
Isa 65:4Ezk 4:14

What scholars say about piggul

פִּגּוּל is a rare priestly noun (four occurrences) of unknown etymology. BDB glosses it "foul thing, refuse," a technical term for unclean sacrificial flesh, and S. R. Driver rendered it "refuse meat," flesh not eaten within the prescribed time. HALOT's tentative comparison to Arabic fajula ("to be flabby, wilted") is widely judged speculative, and DCH lists only the attested senses. Jacob Milgrom (Anchor Bible, Leviticus 1-16) states the etymology is unknown and, reasoning from the four passages, translates "desecrated meat," classing the offense among the karet violations against sacred substance; Baruch Levine (JPS Torah Commentary) renders "an offensive thing" and holds the precise meaning uncertain. The Priestly and Holiness legislation (Leviticus 7:18; 19:7) applies the word to the flesh of a well-being offering (shelamim) eaten on the third day, past its permitted time. Ezekiel 4:14 pairs it with carrion and torn flesh, and Isaiah 65:4 uses a plural for illicit ritual food; the consensus is that these extend the same term rather than attest a separate word. Isaiah 65:4 carries a Ketiv/Qere problem (peraq "piece" versus meraq "broth," the latter supported by 1QIsaa); Graham Davies (Semantics of Ancient Hebrew Database) defends the harder written reading. The rabbinic tradition (Mishnah Zevahim, Sifra, Bavli Zevahim; codified by Maimonides, Hilkhot Pesulei Ha-mukdashin) redefined piggul as disqualification by the officiant's improper intention, which modern critical scholarship treats as midrashic expansion rather than the plain sense of the biblical text.

Where scholars disagree about piggul

What makes an offering piggul: eating the consecrated meat past its permitted time, or the officiating priest's improper intention formed during the ritual.

  • majorityThe offense is the actual eating of holy flesh beyond its allowed day, which leaves the meat desecrated and rejected; this is the plain sense of Leviticus and the dominant modern reading.; BDB, s.v. פִּגּוּל (with S. R. Driver, "refuse meat"); Jacob Milgrom, Leviticus 1-16 (Anchor Bible); Baruch A. Levine, Leviticus (JPS Torah Commentary)
  • minorityThe sacrifice becomes piggul when, during a sacrificial rite, the priest forms the intention to eat or burn it beyond its permitted time or place; the disqualification is a matter of thought, not of anyone actually eating late.; Mishnah Zevahim 2:2-3; Sifra; Bavli Zevahim 28a; Maimonides, Mishneh Torah, Hilkhot Pesulei Ha-mukdashin 13; Marcus Jastrow, Dictionary of the Targumim, s.v. פִּגּוּל
In-depth research

This is a research paper, so it may be hard to read without scholarly background. It is useful if you want to dig even deeper into this word.

Sources

  • BDB, s.v. פִּגּוּלlexicon
  • HALOT, s.v. פִּגּוּלlexicon
  • DCH, s.v. פִּגּוּלlexicon
  • Jacob Milgrom, Leviticus 1-16 (Anchor Bible), NOTE on 7:18commentary
  • Baruch A. Levine, Leviticus (JPS Torah Commentary), at 7:18commentary
  • Walther Zimmerli, Ezekiel 1 (Hermeneia), at 4:14commentary
  • Joseph Blenkinsopp, Isaiah 56-66 (Anchor Bible), at 65:4commentary
  • Mishnah Zevahim 2:2-3; Bavli Zevahim 28a; Maimonides, Hilkhot Pesulei Ha-mukdashin 13primary-source

All attested forms of פִּגּוּל

m s absolute

פִּגּוּל

Lev 7:18, Lev 19:7, Ezk 4:14

m p absolute

פִּגֻּלִים

Isa 65:4