StrongerBible

sheḥin

שְׁחִין

HebrewH7822boil, sores, ...

Appears 13 times · tap a cell to see the verses

Exo 9:9Exo 9:10Exo 9:11 (2×)Lev 13:18Lev 13:19Lev 13:20Lev 13:23Deu 28:27Deu 28:352Ki 20:7Job 2:7Isa 38:21
Word studysheh-KHEENnoun

What sheḥin means

a boil: hot, swollen, painful skin, often a whole crop of inflamed sores

TranslatabilityApproximateCertaintyStrong

Every verse that uses this word describes the same thing: skin that has gone hot, swollen and raw. It is never a tidy single blemish. In Egypt it erupts on people and animals across the whole country, and it blisters and breaks open (the blisters have their own name in that account, אֲבַעְבֻּעֹת). It hurts badly enough that Pharaoh's own advisers cannot stand in Moses' presence. When it strikes Job, it runs from the soles of his feet to the top of his head.

The same condition shows up in three kinds of setting:

  • as a plague sent by God, both on Egypt and in the curses of Deuteronomy, where it is named after Egypt and listed beside other miseries of the skin
  • as a private affliction that ruins a life, striking Job, and later King Hezekiah, whose sore Isaiah treats with a pressed cake of figs
  • as an ordinary medical condition the priests have to watch, since a boil that heals over can leave a suspicious pale patch behind

That third setting is where the word does its most careful work. A boil by itself does not make anyone unclean. But once it heals, a priest inspects the site, because the defiling skin disease of Leviticus 13 (צָרַעַת) can begin at an old boil. If the hair there has turned white and the patch lies lower than the skin around it, the priest names it that disease; if the patch holds still and does not spread, he calls it nothing more than the scar of the boil and pronounces the person clean. So this word marks the common, harmless case that has to be told apart from the serious one.

Because God strikes with it in Deuteronomy and the accuser strikes Job with it, the word carries more weight in the Bible than a modern reader might guess. It belongs to the language of visible, humiliating, whole-body suffering, the kind that makes a person unfit to be seen.

Exo 9:9Exo 9:10Exo 9:11 (2×)Lev 13:18Lev 13:19Lev 13:20Lev 13:23Deu 28:27Deu 28:352Ki 20:7Job 2:7Isa 38:21

Disputed

Whether the word designates one identifiable disease or a general class of inflamed skin eruption.

  • majorityIt is a general descriptive term for an inflamed, ulcerating skin eruption, and the biblical vocabulary of skin affliction should not be mapped onto modern diagnostic categories.; HALOT, s.v. שְׁחִין; E. V. Hulse, "The Nature of Biblical Leprosy and the Use of Alternative Medical Terms in Modern Translations of the Bible," Palestine Exploration Quarterly 107 (1975): 87-105; Jacob Milgrom, Leviticus 1-16, Anchor Bible 3 (New York: Doubleday, 1991)
  • minorityThe affliction of the sixth Egyptian plague can be identified with a specific disease, most often skin anthrax carried by the insects of the preceding plagues.; Greta Hort, "The Plagues of Egypt," Zeitschrift fuer die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft 69 (1957): 84-103; 70 (1958): 48-59

What scholars say about sheḥin

The standard lexicons treat this as a single noun for an inflamed, ulcerating skin eruption, connected with a root associated with heat or burning; BDB, HALOT and DCH all gloss it "boil" without subdividing the entry, and the corpus bears that out: the plague narrative of Exodus 9, the curse lists of Deuteronomy 28, Job's affliction, Hezekiah's illness, and the diagnostic law of Leviticus 13:18-23 all describe one physical condition in different settings. Milgrom's treatment of Leviticus 13 stresses that the boil is a non-defiling ailment which becomes a priestly concern only when the healed site displays the signs of tsara'at, which is why 13:23 can dismiss the residue as no more than the scar of the boil (tsarevet ha-shechin); Wenham reads the sequence the same way, as a differential diagnosis rather than a second disease. On 2 Kings 20:7 Cogan and Tadmor treat Isaiah's poultice of pressed figs as recognized ancient therapy rather than a wonder in itself. Propp surveys the naturalistic identifications of the sixth plague without settling on one. The wider trend in the literature, following Hulse, has been to abandon the older habit of assigning biblical skin terms to modern clinical categories, since the vocabulary is descriptive of appearance rather than diagnostic; Greta Hort's proposal that the sixth plague was skin anthrax spread by the insects of the preceding plagues remains the best known of the specific identifications.

Sources

  • HALOT, s.v. שְׁחִיןlexicon
  • BDB, s.v. שְׁחִיןlexicon
  • DCH, s.v. שחיןlexicon
  • Jacob Milgrom, Leviticus 1-16, Anchor Bible 3 (New York: Doubleday, 1991)commentary
  • Gordon J. Wenham, The Book of Leviticus, New International Commentary on the Old Testament (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1979)commentary
  • William H. C. Propp, Exodus 1-18, Anchor Bible 2 (New York: Doubleday, 1999)commentary
  • Mordechai Cogan and Hayim Tadmor, II Kings, Anchor Bible 11 (Garden City: Doubleday, 1988)commentary
  • E. V. Hulse, "The Nature of Biblical Leprosy and the Use of Alternative Medical Terms in Modern Translations of the Bible," Palestine Exploration Quarterly 107 (1975): 87-105article
  • Greta Hort, "The Plagues of Egypt," Zeitschrift fuer die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft 69 (1957): 84-103; 70 (1958): 48-59article

All attested forms of שְׁחִין

m s absolute

שְּׁחִין, שְׁחִין

Exo 9:11, Exo 9:11, Lev 13:19, Lev 13:20, Lev 13:23, 2Ki 20:7, Isa 38:21, Exo 9:9

m s construct

שְׁחִין

Deu 28:27