StrongerBible

nega

נֶגַע

HebrewH5061plague, stroke, ...

Appears 78 times · tap a cell to see the verses

Gen 12:17Exo 11:1Lev 13:2Lev 13:3 (4×)Lev 13:4Lev 13:5 (2×)Lev 13:6 (2×)Lev 13:9Lev 13:12Lev 13:13Lev 13:17 (2×)Lev 13:20Lev 13:22Lev 13:25Lev 13:27Lev 13:29Lev 13:30Lev 13:31 (2×)Lev 13:42Lev 13:44Lev 13:47Lev 13:49Lev 13:50Lev 13:52Lev 13:54Lev 13:57Lev 13:58Lev 13:59Lev 14:3Lev 14:35Lev 14:40Lev 14:48Deu 17:8 (2×)Deu 21:52Sa 7:141Ki 8:372Ch 6:282Ch 6:29Psa 38:11(12)Psa 39:10(11)Psa 89:32(33)Psa 91:10Pro 6:33Isa 53:8
Root family
Word studyResearch-gradeNEH-gahnoun

What nega means

1

a blow that lands as a sending from God: a plague, calamity, or stroke of discipline understood as coming from his hand.

TranslatabilityPartialCertaintyStrong

This word comes from the ordinary verb for touching or striking, and as a noun it names the thing that lands when contact is made. In this first range it is not a random misfortune but a blow with a sender behind it: a plague on a household, an affliction on the body, a stroke laid on a person because of sin. The Hebrew keeps the two ideas of touch and impact fused in one word, so the same term can be a light touch of warning or a crushing blow, depending on the moment.

Because the blow is read as coming from God, the word carries the weight of judgment and of discipline together. The same stroke that ruins Pharaoh's house can be:

  • the correction a father gives a wayward son
  • the danger a trusting person is kept safe from
  • the suffering an innocent one bears for others

It can even turn inward, naming the private ache a worshipper carries in his own heart.

The senses here differ by who receives the blow and why, not by what the blow is. In every case it is an affliction that someone reads as having God's hand on it. A narrower legal use sits alongside these: in a courtroom setting the same word names a case of bodily injury, the kind of assault a judge must rule on.

Nuances

1aa plague or calamity God sends against a person or household.
Gen 12:17Exo 11:11Ki 8:372Ch 6:28Psa 91:10
1ba blow of correction or discipline, the stroke a father lays on a wayward child.
2Sa 7:14Psa 89:32(33)
1csuffering felt as God's hand striking, whether owned as deserved or borne as innocent.
Psa 38:11(12)Psa 39:10(11)Pro 6:33Isa 53:8
Isa 53:8

Whether the participle and noun of this root in Isaiah 53 deliberately picture the servant as a person struck with the diseased mark of the priestly law, or carry only the general sense of a divinely sent blow.

  • contestedThe wording deliberately evokes a person struck with a diseased mark, echoing the priestly law and the striking of King Uzziah; the ancient Greek revisers, the Latin, and the Talmud all heard the disease overtone.; Shalom M. Paul, Isaiah 40-66, Eerdmans Critical Commentary (2012); Joseph Blenkinsopp, Isaiah 40-55, Anchor Bible 19A (2002)
  • contestedThe wording belongs to the ordinary language of the lament psalms about affliction and sickness, not to a tight link with the priestly law of the diseased mark.; Claus Westermann, Isaiah 40-66, Old Testament Library (1969); John Goldingay and David Payne, Isaiah 40-55, ICC (2006)
1dthe inner wound of the heart, the private grief a worshipper brings before God.
1Ki 8:382Ch 6:29
1ein a courtroom, a case of bodily injury or assault that a judge must rule on.
Deu 17:8 (2×)Deu 21:5
2

the suspect mark a priest inspects: the sore on skin, or the discoloration in cloth or a house wall, presented to be ruled clean or unclean.

TranslatabilityPartialCertaintyStrong

In the law of Leviticus this same word turns technical. It names not a disease in general but the visible mark itself, the one brought to a priest for a verdict:

  • the patch of skin
  • the streak in a garment
  • the greenish or reddish spot in the plaster of a house wall

The priest is told to look at the mark, measure how deep it sits, shut it away, watch whether it spreads, and only then rule the person, the cloth, or the house clean or unclean.

A key point often missed is that this word is the wider category, not the diagnosis. It names the suspicious spot that is examined, while a different Hebrew word (צרעת) names the actual defiling disease that the examination may or may not confirm. So the mark is the thing brought in for a ruling, and only some marks turn out to be the dreaded condition; the rest are released as clean.

The striking thing is that the word reaches beyond the body. A garment and a house can carry such a mark too, and the same inspection applies. The law even says God himself may place such a mark in a house, which is why readers across the centuries have felt this priestly sense and the sense of a divine blow to be two sides of one word: a spot that looks as if it were struck onto a surface, now made the object of careful inspection.

Nuances

2athe sore or mark on a person's skin that the priest inspects for infection.
Lev 13:2Lev 13:3 (4×)Lev 13:4Lev 13:5 (2×)Lev 13:6 (2×)Lev 13:9Lev 13:12Lev 13:13Lev 13:17 (2×)Lev 13:20Lev 13:22Lev 13:25
2bthe spreading mark or mildew in a garment or fabric that the priest inspects.
Lev 13:47Lev 13:49Lev 13:50Lev 13:51Lev 13:52Lev 13:53Lev 13:54Lev 13:55Lev 13:56Lev 13:57Lev 13:58Lev 13:59
2cthe discolored mark or mold in the wall of a house that the priest inspects.
Lev 14:34Lev 14:35Lev 14:36Lev 14:37Lev 14:39Lev 14:40Lev 14:43Lev 14:44Lev 14:48Lev 14:54

Disputed

Why the law quarantines and inspects this mark: whether it reflects a concern with physical contagion, or a symbolic idea of death and impurity appearing on a living surface.

  • majorityThe legislation is symbolic, not medical: the wasting, peeling mark pictures death breaking out on a living body, and the same idea extends even to a garment or a house; fear of catching a disease is not the driving concern.; Jacob Milgrom, Leviticus 1-16, Anchor Bible (1991)
  • minorityA concern with contagion remains part of the picture alongside the symbolic meaning.; Gordon J. Wenham, The Book of Leviticus, NICOT (1979)

What scholars say about nega

The standard lexica (BDB, HALOT, DCH) derive this noun from the verb נגע, to touch or strike, and Stolz (TLOT/TDOT) treats verb and noun together around a single core of registering contact, so that gentle touch and violent blow are contextual specifications of one image. Two poles organize the noun's uses: a stroke understood as an affliction sent by God (plague, calamity, disciplinary blow), and the priestly technical term in Leviticus 13-14. Milgrom's Anchor Bible commentary reads that priestly use as a genus-species system, נֶגַע naming the suspect lesion presented for adjudication and צָרַעַת the specific diagnosis that examination may confirm; he argues the legislation is symbolic (death erupting on a living surface) rather than medical, a reading Douglas develops in terms of violated wholeness and Wenham qualifies by retaining a contagion concern. Hulse's medical-historical work established that true leprosy (Hansen's disease) cannot be the condition described, since it does not affect garments or houses and does not resolve in the law's timeframes; the rendering leprosy entered through the Greek and Latin versions and is now abandoned. The Deuteronomic uses in a forensic triad (Deut 17:8; 21:5) denote assault and bodily-injury cases, on the consensus of Tigay, Weinfeld, and Nelson, while Deut 24:8 cites the priestly sense explicitly. The most contested use is the Fourth Servant Song (Isa 53:4, 8), where scholars divide over whether the servant is deliberately painted as a person struck with a diseased mark (Paul, Blenkinsopp) or in the more general language of the lament psalms (Westermann, Goldingay).

In-depth research

This is a research paper, so it may be hard to read without scholarly background. It is useful if you want to dig even deeper into this word.

Sources

  • HALOT (Koehler-Baumgartner), s.v. נֶגַעlexicon
  • BDB (Brown-Driver-Briggs), s.v. נֶגַעlexicon
  • David J. A. Clines (ed.), The Dictionary of Classical Hebrew (DCH), s.v. נֶגַעlexicon
  • F. Stolz, "נגע ngʿ," in Theological Lexicon of the Old Testament (TLOT); G. André, "נֶגַע," in Theological Dictionary of the Old Testament (TDOT) 9:203-209dictionary
  • Jacob Milgrom, Leviticus 1-16, Anchor Bible (1991)commentary
  • Mary Douglas, Leviticus as Literature (Oxford, 1999)monograph
  • E. V. Hulse, "The Nature of Biblical 'Leprosy,'" Palestine Exploration Quarterly 107 (1975): 87-105article
  • Jeffrey H. Tigay, Deuteronomy, JPS Torah Commentary (1996); Moshe Weinfeld, Deuteronomy 1-11, Anchor Bible (1991)commentary
  • Shalom M. Paul, Isaiah 40-66, Eerdmans Critical Commentary (2012)commentary
  • Claus Westermann, Isaiah 40-66, Old Testament Library (1969)commentary

All attested forms of נֶגַע

m s absolute

נֶּגַע, נֶגַע, נָּגַע, נָגַע

Lev 13:3, Lev 13:3, Lev 13:3, Lev 13:4, Lev 13:5, Lev 13:5, Lev 13:6, Lev 13:6

m s construct

נֶגַע

Lev 13:2, Lev 13:3, Lev 13:9, Lev 13:20, Lev 13:25, Lev 13:27, Lev 13:31, Lev 13:31

m p absolute

נְגָעִים

Gen 12:17, Psa 89:32

m s construct

נִגְעוֹ

Lev 13:44, 2Ch 6:29

m p construct

נִגְעֵי

2Sa 7:14

m s construct

נִגְעִי

Psa 38:11

m s construct

נִגְעֶךָ

Psa 39:10