StrongerBible

ratsaḥ

רָצַח

HebrewH7523murder, kill, ...

Appears 47 times · tap a cell to see the verses

Exo 20:13Num 35:6Num 35:11Num 35:12Num 35:16 (2×)Num 35:17 (2×)Num 35:18 (2×)Num 35:19Num 35:21 (2×)Num 35:27Num 35:30Deu 4:42 (2×)Deu 5:17Deu 22:26Jos 20:3Jos 20:6Jdg 20:41Ki 21:192Ki 6:32Job 24:14Psa 62:3(4)Psa 94:6Pro 22:13Isa 1:21Jer 7:9Hos 4:2Hos 6:9
Root family
Word studyResearch-graderah-TSAKHverb

What ratsaḥ means

to take a fellow human being's life by violence in a way the community must answer for: the killing that triggers Israel's blood-revenge and refuge-city laws, covering murder, accidental killing, and even the killing done in response to it

TranslatabilityPartialCertaintyStrong

This verb names a specific band of killing, and the surprising thing about it is how wide that band is. It is never used of killing in war, of slaughtering an animal, or of God taking a life. It always has a human victim, and it always belongs to the world of bloodguilt: a life has been taken inside the community, and that has to be dealt with. That is its core, and everything else is the range it covers within that core.

Within Israel's homicide laws the same word stretches across the whole spectrum of one person killing another. It names the cold-blooded murderer who strikes with a weapon and intent, and in the very next breath it names the person who kills by pure accident and runs to a city of refuge to escape revenge. Most startling of all, it can name the avenger who lawfully kills the killer, and the court that executes a convicted murderer. One Hebrew word does all of this, which is why no single English word fits: "murder" is too narrow to hold the accidental killer and the executioner, while "kill" is too broad, since this word excludes the soldier and the butcher.

When the word leaves the law courts and enters the Prophets and Psalms, it sharpens into an accusation. There it brands the killing of the weak, the ambush on the road, and the judicial murder dressed up as legal procedure. Elijah can throw it at King Ahab even though Naboth was killed through a rigged but technically legal trial, because the word refuses to let proper paperwork hide the moral fact that an innocent man was put to death.

The single most important thing to understand is that this word does not settle the moral question by itself. It marks the act as the killing of a fellow human that the community must reckon with; whether a given killing is criminal, accidental, or just is decided by the surrounding law and context, not by the word alone.

Nuances

1ato murder: to kill another person criminally and with hostility, the act the Ten Commandments forbid and the Prophets condemn
Exo 20:13Num 35:16 (2×)Num 35:17 (2×)Num 35:18 (2×)Num 35:19Num 35:21 (2×)Num 35:31Deu 5:17Deu 22:26Jdg 20:4Job 24:14Jer 7:9
1bto kill by accident: the unintentional taking of a life, the case the cities of refuge were built to shelter from blood-revenge
Num 35:6Num 35:11Num 35:12Num 35:25Num 35:26Num 35:28Deu 4:42 (2×)Deu 19:3Deu 19:4Deu 19:6Jos 20:3Jos 20:5
1cto kill lawfully in response to a killing: the avenger's or the court's killing of a slayer, which the same word covers without bloodguilt
Num 35:27Num 35:30

What scholars say about ratsaḥ

The lexica converge on a core gloss while disagreeing about its edges: BDB gives "murder, slay" and parses the Qal as premeditated, yet concedes in a footnote that apart from Num 35:30 the verb denotes illegal behaviour; HALOT covers intentional murder, manslaughter, and blood revenge while noting the verb is never used of God, warfare, or sacrifice; TDOT (Hossfeld and Reuter) stresses that the legal corpus deliberately broadened it to embrace intentional and inadvertent homicide of a covenant member; NIDOTTE (Domeris) treats it as killing as a violation of community. The comparative-Semitic evidence is thin: there is no secure Ugaritic or Akkadian cognate, and the often-cited Arabic radakha ("to crush") rests on an irregular sibilant correspondence, so the deep etymology is unrecoverable (Miller). The decisive data is Numbers 35, where the same root names the inadvertent manslayer (v. 11), the intentional murderer (v. 16), the exonerated blood-avenger (v. 27), and judicial execution (v. 30); Milgrom concludes it is used "indiscriminately for manslaughter, irrespective of intention and authorization," and NJPS resorts to four renderings within one chapter. Stamm and Andrew added the influential observation that, unlike harag and hemit, the verb is never used of killing an enemy in battle, which grounds the modern "murder" rendering, refined diachronically by Hossfeld and Phillips. Childs and Miller hold the verb is narrower than general Hebrew killing words but broader than English "murder." The sharpest recent challenge is Wilma Ann Bailey, who argues the post-1970s shift from "kill" to "murder" is lexically unjustified and ideologically motivated; Brueggemann endorsed her method. In the Prophets and Psalms the verb specializes as moral indictment, several times in the intensive stem (Hos 6:9; Isa 1:21; Ps 94:6), and Elijah's use of it against Ahab for a judicially correct execution (1 Kgs 21:19) is the clearest case of the verb piercing legal cover to name a killing as wrongful.

Where scholars disagree about ratsaḥ

Whether the prohibition in the Ten Commandments (Exodus 20:13; Deuteronomy 5:17) is best translated "You shall not kill" (a broad ban on taking human life) or "You shall not murder" (a narrower ban on criminal killing).

  • majorityThe verb is a quasi-technical term for the bloodguilt-bearing killing of a fellow human that triggers Israel's asylum and blood-revenge laws: narrower than general killing words (it excludes war, sacrifice, and divine killing) but broader than English "murder" (it includes the inadvertent manslayer and even the lawful avenger and executioner), so neither English option is fully adequate.; Patrick D. Miller, The Ten Commandments (Interpretation; WJK, 2009); Brevard S. Childs, The Book of Exodus (OTL; Westminster, 1974), 419-21; Jacob Milgrom, The JPS Torah Commentary: Numbers (JPS, 1990), 291
  • minority"Murder" is the proper rendering because the verb is never used of killing an enemy in battle and carries a built-in note of illegitimate killing, a sense the priestly law later extended to cover the inadvertent.; J. J. Stamm and M. E. Andrew, The Ten Commandments in Recent Research (SBT 2/2; SCM, 1967), 98-99; Walter C. Kaiser, Toward Old Testament Ethics (Zondervan, 1983)
  • minorityThe modern shift from "kill" to "murder" is lexically unjustified and theologically motivated, since the same root in Numbers 35 names the accidental manslayer, the exonerated blood-avenger, and judicial execution; the commandment is a broad prohibition that context then narrows.; Wilma Ann Bailey, "You Shall Not Kill" or "You Shall Not Murder"? The Assault on a Biblical Text (Liturgical Press, 2005)
In-depth research

This is a research paper, so it may be hard to read without scholarly background. It is useful if you want to dig even deeper into this word.

Sources

  • Brown, Driver, Briggs, A Hebrew and English Lexicon of the Old Testament (1907), s.v. רָצַחlexicon
  • Koehler-Baumgartner, HALOT (Brill, 1994-2000), p. 1283lexicon
  • F.-L. Hossfeld and E. Reuter, "רצח," TDOT vol. 13 (Eerdmans, 2004)theological-dictionary
  • W. R. Domeris, "רצח," NIDOTTE (Zondervan, 1997)theological-dictionary
  • J. J. Stamm and M. E. Andrew, The Ten Commandments in Recent Research (SBT 2/2; SCM, 1967), 98-99monograph
  • Jacob Milgrom, The JPS Torah Commentary: Numbers (JPS, 1990), 291commentary
  • Baruch A. Levine, Numbers 21-36 (AB 4A; Doubleday, 2000), 554commentary
  • Brevard S. Childs, The Book of Exodus (OTL; Westminster, 1974), 419-21commentary
  • Patrick D. Miller, The Ten Commandments (Interpretation; WJK, 2009)monograph
  • Wilma Ann Bailey, "You Shall Not Kill" or "You Shall Not Murder"? The Assault on a Biblical Text (Liturgical Press, 2005)monograph
  • Jeffrey H. Tigay, Deuteronomy (JPS Torah Commentary; JPS, 1996), 70-71commentary
  • Mordechai Cogan, 1 Kings (AB 10; Doubleday, 2001)commentary

All attested forms of רָצַח

qal participle m s absolute

רֹצֵחַ, רוֹצֵחַ, הָרוֹצֵחַ

Num 35:6, Num 35:11, Num 35:12, Num 35:16, Num 35:16, Num 35:17, Num 35:17, Num 35:18

piel imperfect 3mp

יְרַצְּחוּ, יְרַצֵּחוּ

Hos 6:9, Psa 94:6

qal consecutive-perfect 3ms

וְרָצַח, וּרְצָח

Num 35:27, Deu 22:26

qal imperfect 2ms

תִּֿרְצָח

Exo 20:13, Deu 5:17

qal imperfect 3ms

יִרְצַח

Num 35:30, Deu 4:42

qal infinitive-absolute absolute

רָצֹחַ

Jer 7:9, Hos 4:2

niphal imperfect 1cs

אֵרָצֵחַ

Pro 22:13

niphal participle f s absolute

נִּרְצָחָה

Jdg 20:4

piel imperfect 2mp

תְּרָצְּחוּ

Psa 62:3

piel participle m p absolute

מְרַצְּחִים

Isa 1:21

piel participle m s absolute

מְרַצֵּחַ

2Ki 6:32

qal perfect 2ms

רָצַחְתָּ

1Ki 21:19