a curt order: a short, clipped command laid on someone, one rule barked out after another
This is a one syllable word that turns up in only three verses of the Hebrew Bible, and it is one of the hardest small words in the prophets. It is built on the ordinary verb for commanding (צָוָה), so the standard Hebrew dictionaries gloss it "command" or "precept." It is not, however, the usual noun for a commandment, which is the fuller and far more common מִצְוָה. This one is short and blunt, an order snapped out rather than a law solemnly given.
Eight of its nine appearances are the same jingle, chanted twice in Isaiah 28: "tsav latsav, tsav latsav, qav laqav, qav laqav," traditionally rendered "precept upon precept, line upon line." In the scene, priests and prophets too drunk to stand complain that Isaiah lectures them as if they were babies just off the breast, and they fling his teaching back at him as a string of clipped syllables paired with the word for a builder's measuring line (קַו). Three verses later God returns the mockery: what they turned into baby talk is what his own word will become for them, a jumble they cannot follow and will trip over.
Scholars are genuinely divided about what those syllables are:
- the ordinary noun for an order, repeated to picture instruction handed out in tedious scraps
- mocking nonsense with no dictionary meaning, imitating the way an adult drills a small child
- the names of two Hebrew letters, as though the officials were sneering that the prophet was running an alphabet lesson
The one appearance outside Isaiah, in Hosea 5:11, is a plainer use: Ephraim was determined to walk after an order, meaning a human decree followed in place of God's own instruction. Even there the Hebrew is contested, since the ancient Greek translators read a different word, one meaning worthless or empty things. Between the taunt in Isaiah and the disputed line in Hosea, this is better treated as a puzzle the prophets set than as a settled term to build on.
Nuances
Whether the Hebrew text of Hosea 5:11 reads tsav at all. The Masoretic Text has Ephraim determined to walk after tsav, which the lexica take as a command, understood as a human decree followed instead of the LORD's instruction. The Septuagint instead renders with a word for vain or worthless things, which presupposes a Hebrew text reading shav, and many commentators have followed it; other proposals connect the consonants to a word for filth. Because this is the only occurrence of the noun outside the contested Isaiah passage, the decision carries weight for the word as a whole.
- contestedKeep the Masoretic Text: Ephraim chose to follow an order, that is, a human decree such as the northern kingdom's own royal rulings about worship, rather than what the LORD had commanded.; HALOT, s.v. צַו; A. A. Macintosh, A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on Hosea (International Critical Commentary; T&T Clark, 1997)
- contestedRead a word meaning emptiness or worthless things, following the ancient Greek version, so that Ephraim went after worthless idols; a correction long carried in the lexica as a live possibility.; BDB, s.v. צַו; Septuagint, Hosea 5:11