StrongerBible

arov

עָרֹב

HebrewH6157swarms of flies, swarms of insects, ...

Appears 9 times · tap a cell to see the verses

Exo 8:21(17) (2×)Exo 8:22(18)Exo 8:24(20) (2×)Exo 8:29(25)Exo 8:31(27)Psa 78:45Psa 105:31
Root family
Word studyah-ROHVnoun

What arov means

the swarm: the dense mass of pests God sent as the fourth plague on Egypt, filling houses and ruining the land

TranslatabilityPartialCertaintyContested

This word belongs to a single story. It names the fourth blow God strikes against Egypt: a dense swarm that pours into Pharaoh's palace and the houses of his officials, covers the ground itself, and leaves the country spoiled, while the district of Goshen where Israel lives is deliberately kept clear of it. Two psalms retelling the exodus reach back for the same word, and it appears nowhere else in the Hebrew Bible.

What the text never says is what the swarm was made of. The word seems to be built from a root meaning "to mix," which has pulled readers in two directions: some hear a mixed horde of assorted creatures, others a mass of small pests mixed together in one cloud. Instead of a species, the account gives effects:

  • it arrives in such weight that the story calls it heavy
  • it gets inside houses rather than staying out in the fields
  • it leaves the land itself ruined behind it
  • one psalm says the swarm devoured the Egyptians, so it bit or stung
  • when God lifts it, not one of them is left

Hebrew has a plain word for a fly (זְבוּב), and a separate word for the gnats of the plague just before this one (כֵּן), which stands beside this word in Psalm 105:31. The writers used neither. They chose a term that pictures the swarm as one oncoming mass rather than the creatures inside it, and they used it for nothing else. English versions have to supply a creature the Hebrew withholds, which is why they do not agree.

Exo 8:21(17) (2×)Exo 8:22(18)Exo 8:24(20) (2×)Exo 8:29(25)Exo 8:31(27)Psa 78:45Psa 105:31

Disputed

What creature the fourth plague consisted of. The narrative never identifies the swarm, and the noun occurs nowhere outside this one episode, so every identification rests on the derivation of the word, on the ancient translations, and on the effects the text describes.

  • majoritySwarming insects, most plausibly biting or blood-sucking flies. The Greek Old Testament renders the word with a term for the dog-fly at every occurrence, Jerome's Latin has flies of various kinds, and the standard lexica gloss it as a swarm of flies; Psalm 78:45 says the swarm devoured its victims, which suits an insect that bites.; HALOT, s.v. עָרֹב; BDB, s.v. עָרֹב; DCH, s.v. עָרֹב; Greta Hort, "The Plagues of Egypt," Zeitschrift für die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft 69 (1957): 84-103 and 70 (1958): 48-59
  • minorityA mixed horde of assorted wild creatures, taking the noun directly from the root sense of mixing. This reading is carried by much of the classical Jewish exegetical tradition, and it accounts easily for the ruin of the land and for the devouring reported in Psalm 78:45 without requiring an unusually aggressive insect.; Rashi, Commentary on Exodus 8:17 (Hebrew numbering; English 8:21)

What scholars say about arov

The noun עָרֹב occurs nine times in seven verses, all of them in the fourth-plague narrative of Exodus 8:21-31 (Hebrew numbering 8:17-27) and in its two psalmic retellings, Psalm 78:45 and Psalm 105:31. It is standardly derived from the root ערב I, "to mix, mingle," and analysed as a collective singular, which is why Exodus 8:31 can say that when the plague lifted "not one remained." BDB glosses it as swarms of flies; HALOT and DCH keep the same identification, HALOT following the entomological line that the creature was a biting fly. The versions are the earliest surviving interpretation and they already diverge in emphasis. The Septuagint renders the word κυνόμυια, "dog-fly," at every occurrence, and Jerome's Latin has flies of various kinds, while the classical Jewish exegetical tradition, represented by Rashi at Exodus 8:17 in the Hebrew numbering, reads a mixture of wild and dangerous animals by appealing to the same root sense of mixing. Greta Hort's two-part study of the plague sequence (ZAW 69 [1957] and ZAW 70 [1958]) proposed the specific identification Stomoxys calcitrans, the stable fly, which she also made the vector of the murrain and the boils in the plagues that follow; the identification continues to be cited even by commentators who reject her naturalistic reconstruction of the sequence as a whole. Nahum Sarna (JPS Torah Commentary) renders "swarms of insects" and stresses that the Hebrew withholds the species. William Propp (Anchor Bible) surveys the proposals and treats the vagueness as original to the text rather than as a gap that later readers must fill. Cornelis Houtman (Historical Commentary on the Old Testament) collects the range of ancient and modern identifications. The verb אכל in Psalm 78:45, "and it devoured them," is the datum most often pressed by both sides, taken either as evidence of a biting insect or as evidence of predatory animals. Attempts to read the plague as a polemic against Egyptian beetle or fly iconography are modern suggestions with no anchor in the wording of the text.

Sources

  • HALOT, s.v. עָרֹבlexicon
  • BDB, s.v. עָרֹבlexicon
  • DCH, s.v. עָרֹבlexicon
  • William H. C. Propp, Exodus 1-18, Anchor Bible 2 (Doubleday, 1999)commentary
  • Nahum M. Sarna, Exodus, JPS Torah Commentary (Jewish Publication Society, 1991)commentary
  • Cornelis Houtman, Exodus, vol. 2, Historical Commentary on the Old Testament (Kok, 1996)commentary
  • Greta Hort, "The Plagues of Egypt," Zeitschrift für die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft 69 (1957): 84-103 and 70 (1958): 48-59article
  • Rashi, Commentary on Exodus 8:17 (Hebrew numbering)commentary

All attested forms of עָרֹב

m s absolute

עָרֹב

Exo 8:21, Exo 8:21, Exo 8:22, Exo 8:24, Exo 8:24, Exo 8:29, Exo 8:31, Psa 78:45