StrongerBible

yetser

יֵצֶר

HebrewH3336imagination, frame, ...

Appears 9 times · tap a cell to see the verses

Gen 6:5Gen 8:21Deu 31:211Ch 28:91Ch 29:18Psa 103:14Isa 26:3Isa 29:16Hab 2:18
Root family
Word studyResearch-gradeYEH-tsernoun

What yetser means

1

something formed: a shaped object, or the human creature God shaped from dust

TranslatabilityPartialCertaintySettled

This is the down-to-earth sense of the word, rooted in the picture of a potter at his wheel. The verb behind it means to form or shape, and this noun names what comes off the wheel: the thing that has been made.

The Bible uses it three ways at this concrete end. It can name a manufactured object held up to ridicule, as when a prophet calls a cast metal idol a mere "thing made" that its own maker foolishly trusts. It can name a clay pot, in the absurd image of the pot talking back to the potter who shaped it. And, most movingly, it can name the human being as a formed thing: Psalm 103 says God knows our frame and remembers that we are dust, echoing the opening of Genesis where God shapes the first human out of the ground.

What ties these together is the relationship between a maker and the made. The word keeps the reader's eye on the fact that the object did not make itself. That is why it lends itself both to mocking an idol (a made thing that cannot save) and to comforting a frail person (a made thing whose Maker has not forgotten how fragile he built it).

Nuances

1aa fashioned object, especially an idol or a pot, viewed as a mere made thing
Isa 29:16Hab 2:18
1bthe human creature itself as a thing God formed: our frame or make-up
Psa 103:14
2

the bent of the heart: what a person forms inside, their settled disposition, plans, or intentions

TranslatabilityPartialCertaintyStrong

By a natural stretch, the same word that names a thing shaped by hand comes to name a thing shaped in the mind: a plan, a purpose, the habitual cast of someone's thinking. An old description put it well: thoughts (מחשׁבה) are things formed in the heart (לב). The image moves inward, from the potter's lump to the inner shaping the heart now does for itself.

It is important to see that the word by itself is morally neutral. It simply names which way a person is inwardly bent, and the text has to tell you whether that bent is good or bad. In the flood story it is paired with the word for "evil," so the human heart's bent is condemned as evil from youth. But the very same word is used for a praiseworthy frame of mind: a king prays that God would keep the people's inner intent fixed on him, and a prophet promises peace to the mind that stays steadfastly trusting. The good and the bad uses sit side by side, which is the strongest evidence that the negative color in the flood story comes from its surroundings, not from this word.

Readers should be careful here. Later Jewish tradition turned this word into a technical name for an "evil impulse" wrestling inside every person, and Christian readers have sometimes found a doctrine of inborn corruption in the Genesis verses. Both are reading a much later, fuller idea back into a modest Hebrew word that, on its own, just means "the inward bent a person has," for better or worse.

Nuances

2aa person's settled inner bent or disposition, neither good nor bad in itself until context tells
Deu 31:211Ch 28:91Ch 29:18Isa 26:3
2bthe bent of the human heart specifically condemned as evil in the flood narrative
Gen 6:5Gen 8:21

What scholars say about yetser

Modern lexica (BDB, HALOT, DCH) and TDOT (Otzen) treat the noun as a qetel-pattern derivative of the root yṣr I "to form, shape," lexicalizing either the act or, more often, the product of forming, and arrange its nine occurrences along a concrete-to-abstract spectrum: a fashioned object or idol (Isa 29:16; Hab 2:18), the human creature as formed from dust (Ps 103:14), and "what is framed in the mind," i.e. imagination, plan, or disposition (Gen 6:5; 8:21; Deut 31:21; 1 Chr 28:9; 29:18; Isa 26:3). Humbert's 1958 study mapped the verb's drift from craftsman's vocabulary to creator vocabulary to mental-planning vocabulary, a drift the noun inherits. TLOT (Schmidt) and TDOT stress that the noun is morally neutral in classical Biblical Hebrew: the negative valence at Gen 6:5 / 8:21 is supplied by the adjective raʿ, while 1 Chr 29:18 and Isa 26:3 are positive. The LXX confirms the bipolarity, rendering the concrete pole with plasma/plassō (the cognate of eplasen in its own Gen 2:7) and the abstract pole with dianoia / enthymēma, though its pejorative ponēria at Deut 31:21 and additive epimelōs at Gen 6:5/8:21 show an interpretive convention already crystallizing. The technical "evil inclination" (yetzer ha-raʿ) and the bipartite good/evil-inclination doctrine are post-biblical: Ben Sira nudges the term toward moral anthropology, Qumran begins its reification and demonization (e.g. 11Q5 XIX; 4Q436), and only rabbinic literature systematizes the doctrine (m. Berakhot 9:5; b. Berakhot 61a; Genesis Rabbah 9:7). Rosen-Zvi's work argues the rabbinic construct is discontinuous with the biblical word rather than its smooth development.

Where scholars disagree about yetser

Whether Genesis 6:5 and 8:21, in describing the bent of the human heart as evil, teach an inborn corruption of human nature (a doctrine of original sin or total depravity), or whether they describe a contextual, historically-conditioned wickedness while the noun itself stays morally neutral.

  • majorityThe verses describe humanity's condition rhetorically, not ontologically; the noun is morally neutral and the negative weight comes from the qualifier "evil," so they do not teach inherited corruption (the critical and most Jewish reading).; Claus Westermann, Genesis 1-11: A Continental Commentary, ET (Augsburg, 1984), 411-414, 455-458; Nahum M. Sarna, Genesis, JPS Torah Commentary (JPS, 1989), 46-47, 59; Jon D. Levenson, Creation and the Persistence of Evil (Harper, 1988)
  • minorityThe verses are a locus classicus for the depth and innateness of human sinfulness, the phrase "from his youth" pointing to an inborn tendency (the Reformed Christian reading).; Bruce K. Waltke with Cathi J. Fredricks, Genesis: A Commentary (Zondervan, 2001), 117, 141; Henri Blocher, Original Sin: Illuminating the Riddle, NSBT 5 (IVP, 1997), 24-28, 63-95
In-depth research

This is a research paper, so it may be hard to read without scholarly background. It is useful if you want to dig even deeper into this word.

Sources

  • HALOT, s.v. יֵצֶרlexicon
  • BDB, p. 428, s.v. יֵצֶרlexicon
  • D. J. A. Clines, ed., The Dictionary of Classical Hebrew, vol. 4, s.v. יֵצֶרlexicon
  • Benedikt Otzen, "יָצַר," in TDOT, vol. 6, 257-265theological-dictionary
  • W. H. Schmidt, "יצר yṣr to form," in Theological Lexicon of the Old Testament, vol. 2theological-dictionary
  • Paul Humbert, "Emploi et portée biblique du verbe yāṣar et de ses dérivés substantifs," in Von Ugarit nach Qumran, BZAW 77 (1958), 82-88monograph
  • Ishay Rosen-Zvi, Demonic Desires: Yetzer Hara and the Problem of Evil in Late Antiquity (Univ. of Pennsylvania Press, 2011)monograph
  • Claus Westermann, Genesis 1-11: A Continental Commentary, ET (Augsburg, 1984), 411-414, 455-458commentary
  • Gordon J. Wenham, Genesis 1-15, WBC 1 (Word, 1987), 142-145, 188-191commentary
  • Nahum M. Sarna, Genesis, JPS Torah Commentary (JPS, 1989), 46-47, 59commentary
  • John Goldingay, Psalms, vol. 3, BCOT (Baker Academic, 2008), 173-177commentary

All attested forms of יֵצֶר

m s construct

יֵצֶר

Gen 6:5, Gen 8:21, 1Ch 28:9, 1Ch 29:18

m s absolute

יֵצֶר

Isa 26:3, Isa 29:16

m s construct

יִצְרוֹ

Deu 31:21, Hab 2:18

m s construct

יִצְרֵנוּ

Psa 103:14