StrongerBible

ḥamot

חֲמוֹת

HebrewH2545mother-in-law

Appears 11 times · tap a cell to see the verses

Rut 1:14Rut 2:11Rut 2:18Rut 2:19 (2×)Rut 2:23Rut 3:1Rut 3:6Rut 3:16Rut 3:17Mic 7:6
Root family
Word studykhah-MOHTnoun

What ḥamot means

mother-in-law: the mother of a woman's husband, the senior woman of the household that woman has married into

TranslatabilityApproximateCertaintySettled

The word turns up only eleven times, and nine of them fall in the book of Ruth, where it works almost as Naomi's title. It never stands on its own: every time, it is somebody's mother-in-law, because the word names a position in a family rather than a person.

Hebrew keeps the two sides of a marriage apart with two different families of words. This word and its male partner, father-in-law (חָם), always point to the husband's parents. The wife's parents are named with a different set of words (חֹתֵן), which is why the law in Deuteronomy 27:23 about a man and his wife's mother does not use this word at all.

That one-sidedness matters because of how households worked. A married woman left her father's house and joined her husband's father's household, so her husband's mother was not a distant relative by marriage but the senior woman she now lived with and under. Ruth's story presses on exactly that point: both husbands are dead, the tie that had placed Ruth in Naomi's household died with them, and Ruth stays anyway. Boaz singles this out for praise in Ruth 2:11.

Micah 7:6 turns the same bond the other way. When a daughter-in-law (כַּלָּה) rises against her mother-in-law, the household has broken from the inside, and that is the prophet's picture of a whole society coming apart. Jesus quotes the line in Matthew 10:35 and Luke 12:53.

Rut 1:14Rut 2:11Rut 2:18Rut 2:19 (2×)Rut 2:23Rut 3:1Rut 3:6Rut 3:16Rut 3:17Mic 7:6

What scholars say about ḥamot

The noun is the feminine counterpart of חָם, both formed on a Semitic kinship root also attested in Akkadian and Arabic that designates relatives acquired through the husband. BDB, HALOT and DCH agree in glossing it specifically as the husband's mother, and they file the wife's parents under the separate root חתן, whose feminine form חֹתֶנֶת appears at Deuteronomy 27:23. The distribution is unusually concentrated: nine of the eleven attestations stand in Ruth, where Naomi is repeatedly identified by the term rather than by name. Hubbard and Sakenfeld connect that concentration to the book's reworking of ordinary household roles around two widows, with the affinal tie carrying the weight normally borne by a surviving male head. Steinberg's account of household economics supplies the background assumption: the incoming wife entered her husband's father's household and remained attached to it, which is what makes Ruth's continued attachment to Naomi legally dispensable and narratively striking, and what Boaz's commendation in 2:11 registers. Micah 7:6, the single occurrence outside Ruth, sets the daughter-in-law against the mother-in-law within a catalogue of household collapse; Hillers reads the couplet as a conventional picture of inverted social order, and the verse is taken up at Matthew 10:35 and Luke 12:53, where πενθερά renders the term.

Sources

  • HALOT, s.v. חָמוֹתlexicon
  • BDB, s.v. חָמוֹתlexicon
  • DCH, s.v. חָמוֹתlexicon
  • Robert L. Hubbard Jr., The Book of Ruth (NICOT; Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1988)commentary
  • Katharine Doob Sakenfeld, Ruth (Interpretation; Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 1999)commentary
  • Naomi Steinberg, Kinship and Marriage in Genesis: A Household Economics Perspective (Minneapolis: Fortress, 1993)monograph
  • Delbert R. Hillers, Micah (Hermeneia; Philadelphia: Fortress, 1984)commentary

All attested forms of חֲמוֹת

f s construct

חֲמוֹתָהּ, חֲמֹתָהּ

Rut 1:14, Rut 2:18, Rut 2:19, Rut 2:19, Rut 2:23, Rut 3:1, Rut 3:6, Rut 3:16

f s construct

חֲמוֹתֵךְ

Rut 2:11, Rut 3:17