a royal ban: a binding prohibition issued by a king, forbidding an act to everyone under his rule
The word grows out of the everyday idea of tying something up. The related verb is used of harnessing an animal or shackling a prisoner, and turned into a legal term it names an order that ties people's hands. In Daniel 6 it is the ban that the king's officials talk him into: for thirty days nobody may ask anything of any god or any person except the king himself.
All seven uses belong to that one episode, and together they follow the ban through its short life:
- the officials propose that the king put one in force alongside a royal statute (Daniel 6:7)
- they press him to sign it into a written order that cannot be altered (Daniel 6:8, Daniel 6:9)
- they come back and hold him to the ban he signed (Daniel 6:12, Daniel 6:13)
- they argue from it that not even the king may now undo it (Daniel 6:15)
Daniel 6 stacks up several words for official orders, and this is the narrowest of them. The empire's standing law (דָּת) is the fixed legal order behind everything. A statute the king sets up (קְיָם) puts something in place. An order he hands down (טְעֵם) can tell anyone to do anything. This word does one thing only: it forbids. Twice it is paired with the word for a statute, as if to say the king had both established something and shut something down.
The story turns on how tightly the word binds. The ban is drafted to catch one man, and it is made so firm that the king who signed it spends a whole day looking for a way around his own words and never finds one.