StrongerBible

Christianos

Χριστιανός

GreekG5546Christian

Appears 3 times · tap a cell to see the verses

Act 11:26Act 26:281Pe 4:16
Root family
Word studyResearch-gradekhree-stee-ah-NOSSnoun

What Christianos means

a Christian: one of Christ's people, in a name coined by outsiders for the followers of Jesus rather than chosen by them

TranslatabilityApproximateCertaintySettled

The word is "Christ" plus an ending that Greek borrowed from Latin, the ending used to name a public figure's supporters, household, and hangers-on. Herod's partisans were Herodians; Caesar's men were Caesarians. On that pattern, Christians simply meant "Christ's people," the way a political faction is named after its leader. The shape of the word also hints at who invented it: it treats "Christ" as a personal name rather than as the Jewish title "the anointed one" (Χριστός), which suggests whoever coined it no longer heard that title in the word at all.

All three times the word appears in the New Testament, it is on somebody else's lips, never the community's own:

  • Acts reports that the name was first pinned on the disciples at Antioch
  • King Agrippa tosses it at Paul as a way of brushing him off
  • 1 Peter treats it as the charge a believer might be made to suffer under

The words believers used for themselves at the time were different: "disciples" (μαθηταί), "brothers," "believers," "holy ones," and in Acts "the Way" (ὁδός). Luke, who reports the new name, never adopts it as his own word for them.

1 Peter is where the outsiders' label starts turning into a badge. It warns against suffering as a murderer or a thief, then puts suffering "as a Christian" in that same list, as though the name itself had become a chargeable offense. The response is not to dodge the label but to take it up: do not be ashamed, and honor God by that very name. Within a generation or two the reversal was complete. Ignatius of Antioch wrote about "Christianity" with pride, and martyrs answered their judges with the plain words "I am a Christian."

That a movement gets named from the outside is itself telling. Outsiders needed a fresh label only once believers were no longer simply one more group inside the synagogue, and Antioch, where large numbers of non-Jews had joined, is exactly where you would expect that to happen first. Jewish sources kept using other names for the movement, such as "Nazarene" (Ναζωραῖος) and the word for a party or faction (αἵρεσις).

Act 11:26Act 26:281Pe 4:16
Act 11:26

Whether χρηματίσαι in Acts 11:26 reports that the disciples were given the name Χριστιανοί by others, or that they bore or assumed it themselves. The verb can mean "to bear or be given a name, be styled," and in papyri and inscriptions it carries a public or official flavor.

  • majorityThe sense is "came to be called," so the name was applied to the disciples at Antioch by people outside the movement. Luke's own preferred word for insiders remains μαθηταί, which he keeps using afterward.; BDAG, s.v. χρηματίζω; C. K. Barrett, The Acts of the Apostles, International Critical Commentary (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1994 to 1998), on 11:26
  • minorityThe verb is active in force, so the disciples styled themselves Χριστιανοί. Bickerman argued that the grammatically correct sense of the related aorist forms in the Fathers is active, and that the passive ἐχρηματίσθησαν in Chrysostom is probably a copyist's error for the active ἐχρημάτισαν.; Elias Bickerman, "The Name of Christians," Harvard Theological Review 42 (1949) 109 to 124
1Pe 4:16

Whether suffering ὡς Χριστιανός in 1 Peter 4:16 presupposes formal legal accusation for the name, or only informal social hostility. The placement of ὡς Χριστιανός in the vice-list of 4:15 (murderer, thief, κακοποιός, ἀλλοτριεπίσκοπος) is the crux, and the answer bears on the letter's date.

  • majorityThe suffering is chiefly social: slander, ostracism, and verbal abuse rather than judicial proceedings. On this reading nothing in 1 Peter requires the Trajanic situation, and an earlier date remains open.; John H. Elliott, 1 Peter: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary, Anchor Bible 37B (New York: Doubleday, 2000); Paul J. Achtemeier, 1 Peter, Hermeneia (Minneapolis: Fortress, 1996)
  • minorityThe consensus for purely unofficial hostility should be abandoned: popular hostility and the risk of formal accusation for the Name were interconnected rather than alternatives, as Pliny's correspondence with Trajan (Ep. 10.96 to 97) shows. Horrell further reads the verse as the earliest witness to the label's transvaluation into a claimed self-designation.; David G. Horrell, "The Label Χριστιανός: 1 Peter 4.16 and the Formation of Christian Identity," Journal of Biblical Literature 126 (2007) 361 to 381; Travis B. Williams, Persecution in 1 Peter: Differentiating and Contextualizing Early Christian Suffering, NovTSup 145 (Leiden: Brill, 2012)

Disputed

Who coined Χριστιανός, and whether it began as mockery, as an administrative designation, or as a self-designation. The suffix -ιανός, a Greek borrowing of Latin -ianus, marks the partisans or household of the person named (Caesariani, Ciceroniani, Ἡρωδιανοί), and its treatment of Χριστός as a personal name rather than a title is the shared datum all three positions must explain.

  • majorityGentile residents of Antioch coined it as a nickname for a newly visible group, on the pattern of Greek and Latin names for a leader's partisans. Mattingly proposed the Augustiani, Nero's organized claque of applauders, as the specific model, making the coinage a piece of civic mockery.; Harold Mattingly, "The Origin of the Name Christiani," Journal of Theological Studies n.s. 9 (1958) 26 to 37, esp. 27; C. K. Barrett, The Acts of the Apostles, International Critical Commentary (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1994 to 1998), on 11:26; Joseph A. Fitzmyer, The Acts of the Apostles, Anchor Bible 31 (New York: Doubleday, 1998), on 11:26
  • minorityRoman authorities at Antioch applied the name as an administrative designation, in connection with public disturbances over the proclamation of Jesus as Messiah, so that Χριστιανοί became bound up with sedition.; Justin Taylor, "Why Were the Disciples First Called Christians at Antioch? (Acts 11, 26)," Revue Biblique 101 (1994) 75 to 94
  • minorityThe believers themselves took the name at Antioch. Bickerman conceded that non-Christians almost certainly invented the term, but read the verb of Acts 11:26 actively, so that the disciples styled themselves Christians.; Elias Bickerman, "The Name of Christians," Harvard Theological Review 42 (1949) 109 to 124

What scholars say about Christianos

Χριστιανός is formed from Χριστός with the suffix -ιανός, a Greek borrowing of the Latin -ianus, which in both languages marks the adherents, household, or partisans of the person named (Caesariani, Ciceroniani, Ἡρωδιανοί). Bickerman's 1949 study remains the standard philological treatment of the suffix and of the verb χρηματίζω in Acts 11:26; he conceded that non-Christians almost certainly coined the word, while arguing against the majority that the disciples took it up themselves. Mattingly proposed the Augustiani as the model for an Antiochene coinage of mockery, and Taylor argued instead for a Roman administrative origin tied to disturbances at Antioch around AD 39 to 40; Spicq's lexical study stresses the Caesariani parallel. The word is absent from the Septuagint, which uses only χριστός to render מָשִׁיחַ, and its formation treats Χριστός as a personal name rather than a title, which is the main reason a Gentile or Roman setting is generally assumed. Horrell reads 1 Peter 4:16 as the earliest witness to the transvaluation of a hostile outsider label into a claimed self-designation, and challenges the largely English-language consensus (Elliott, Achtemeier) that 1 Peter reflects only unofficial hostility; Williams argues similarly for a differentiated picture in which local accusations could reach magistrates. Lieu treats the confession Χριστιανός εἰμι as co-producing the categories of martyr and Christian, while Mason and others place the later abstraction Χριστιανισμός, coined by Ignatius against Ἰουδαϊσμός, within the slow construction of bounded group identities. Extra-biblical attestation runs from Josephus (Ant. 18.63 to 64, text-critically contested) and Tacitus (Ann. 15.44, whose earliest manuscript reads Chrestianos) through Pliny, Ep. 10.96 to 97 (c. 112), where the name itself (nomen ipsum) is the question put to Trajan, to Ignatius and the Martyrdom of Polycarp. The variant spelling Χρηστιανός, attested in Sinaiticus among others, reflects the homophony of Χριστός and χρηστός ("good, kind"), a confusion Justin later turned to apologetic use in 1 Apology 4. The earliest secure documentary attestation of the word applied to a named individual is P.Oxy. XLII 3035, dated 28 February 256, better described as a summons than an arrest order (Luijendijk); the Pompeii graffito CIL IV 679 cannot be relied on, since the original faded within days and the nineteenth-century transcriptions disagree precisely on the crucial letters.

In-depth research

This is a research paper, so it may be hard to read without scholarly background. It is useful if you want to dig even deeper into this word.

Sources

  • BDAG, s.v. Χριστιανόςlexicon
  • BDAG, s.v. χρηματίζωlexicon
  • Elias Bickerman, "The Name of Christians," Harvard Theological Review 42 (1949) 109 to 124article
  • Harold Mattingly, "The Origin of the Name Christiani," Journal of Theological Studies n.s. 9 (1958) 26 to 37article
  • Ceslas Spicq, "Ce que signifie le titre de chrétien," Studia Theologica 15.1 (1961) 68 to 78article
  • Justin Taylor, "Why Were the Disciples First Called Christians at Antioch? (Acts 11, 26)," Revue Biblique 101 (1994) 75 to 94article
  • David G. Horrell, "The Label Χριστιανός: 1 Peter 4.16 and the Formation of Christian Identity," Journal of Biblical Literature 126 (2007) 361 to 381article
  • David G. Horrell, Becoming Christian: Essays on 1 Peter and the Making of Christian Identity, Library of New Testament Studies 394 (London: Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2013)monograph
  • Travis B. Williams, Persecution in 1 Peter: Differentiating and Contextualizing Early Christian Suffering, NovTSup 145 (Leiden: Brill, 2012)monograph
  • John H. Elliott, 1 Peter, Anchor Bible 37B (New York: Doubleday, 2000)commentary
  • Paul J. Achtemeier, 1 Peter, Hermeneia (Minneapolis: Fortress, 1996)commentary
  • C. K. Barrett, The Acts of the Apostles, International Critical Commentary (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1994 to 1998)commentary
  • Joseph A. Fitzmyer, The Acts of the Apostles, Anchor Bible 31 (New York: Doubleday, 1998)commentary
  • Judith M. Lieu, Christian Identity in the Jewish and Graeco-Roman World (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004)monograph
  • Larry W. Hurtado, Destroyer of the Gods: Early Christian Distinctiveness in the Roman World (Waco: Baylor University Press, 2016)monograph
  • Philippa Townsend, "Who Were the First Christians? Jews, Gentiles and the Christianoi," in Heresy and Identity in Late Antiquity, ed. Eduard Iricinschi and Holger M. Zellentin (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2008)essay
  • John-Christian Eurell, "Becoming Christian: On the Identification of Christ-Believers as Χριστιανοί," Journal of Early Christian History 10 (2020)article
  • AnneMarie Luijendijk, Greetings in the Lord: Early Christians and the Oxyrhynchus Papyri, Harvard Theological Studies 60 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008) 177 to 179monograph

All attested forms of Χριστιανός

accusative m p

Χριστιανούς

Act 11:26

accusative m s

Χριστιανὸν

Act 26:28

nominative m s

Χριστιανός

1Pe 4:16