a person attached to a particular teacher as follower and learner, whose way of life is shaped by that teacher
The word comes from the ordinary Greek verb for learning (μανθάνω), and in everyday Greek it named a pupil: someone studying under a philosopher, or an apprentice picking up a trade, often for a fee. The New Testament shifts the weight of the word from the classroom to the road. A disciple is defined less by what he is studying than by whom he is walking behind, which is why the Gospels reach so often for the verb "to follow" (ἀκολουθέω) rather than for the verb "to learn" when they describe the relationship.
Several things set that relationship apart from the schools of the day:
- Jesus calls people, instead of waiting for students to apply to him.
- Nobody graduates: the disciple stays a disciple, and Jesus stays the one teacher (διδάσκαλος).
- The terms are total, reaching as far as family, property, and life itself.
- The aim is not mastering a body of teaching but joining what Jesus says God is now doing.
The word is also elastic. It covers the Twelve, and a large crowd besides, and even people who follow for a while and then walk away (John 6:66). In Acts it widens again until it simply means anyone who belongs to Jesus, including thousands who never met him in Galilee: Luke can say that the disciples at Antioch were the people first called Christians (Χριστιανός).
One more thing gives the word its shape. It is confined to the four Gospels and Acts. Paul never uses it once, and neither do the other letters or Revelation. Where the Gospels speak of following, Paul speaks of imitating (μιμητής), most likely because his churches had never walked the roads of Galilee behind Jesus in person.
Nuances
Disputed
What kind of teacher-follower relationship the Gospels' use of the word presupposes: the later Jewish model of a sage and the students who memorize his rulings, or a charismatic and prophetic model closer to Elijah's call of Elisha.
- majorityThe detailed rabbinic picture comes from sources written long after the first century and should not be read back into Jesus' lifetime; his sovereign call, his demand that followers leave everything, and his authority over against the Law place him nearer the prophetic and charismatic leaders, with Elijah and Elisha the best available background.; Martin Hengel, The Charismatic Leader and His Followers (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1981); John P. Meier, A Marginal Jew, vol. 3: Companions and Competitors (New York: Doubleday, 2001); E. P. Sanders, Jesus and Judaism (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1985)
- minorityThe transmission of Jesus' teaching worked much as later Jewish instruction did, with disciples learning an authoritative master's words by heart, so the rabbinic model remains the right frame for reading the Gospel disciples.; Birger Gerhardsson, Memory and Manuscript: Oral Tradition and Written Transmission in Rabbinic Judaism and Early Christianity (Uppsala: Gleerup, 1961)
- minorityA mediating position: Jesus really did teach, and his sayings really were memorized and passed on with care, but that need not be explained by the later rabbinic school system.; Rainer Riesner, Jesus als Lehrer, WUNT 2/7 (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1981)