to hurl someone off a cliff: to send a person over the edge of a height so that the fall kills them
This word is built from the Greek noun for a cliff or steep bank (κρημνός) plus a prefix meaning "down." So it never means simply to push someone over or knock them flat. It means to send a person over an edge, and the fall is expected to be the end of them. Greek writers use it for captives thrown from the top of a rock, for men flung from ships, towers, and horses, and for criminals hurled from a height as punishment.
It appears once in the New Testament, at Luke 4:29, where the crowd in Nazareth drives Jesus out of the town, marches him to the edge of the hill it was built on, and means to throw him off. The Greek says only what they intended, "so as to throw him down," and the next sentence reports that Jesus passed through the middle of them and walked away. The word therefore describes an attempt that failed, and everything it implies about a deadly fall belongs to what the crowd meant to do, not to what happened.
What kind of act was intended is where scholars part ways. Many read it as a lynching: a killing improvised by an enraged crowd, with no trial, no witnesses, and no legal process, on a Sabbath when a sentence could not lawfully be carried out. Others hear behind it the Jewish penalty of stoning (λιθοβολέω), which later Jewish law describes as beginning with a push from a height, so that throwing Jesus down would be the opening move rather than the whole method. Either way, Luke sets the scene at the very start of Jesus' public work as a preview of what follows: the town that first admired him turns on him, and the rejection that ends at the cross is already in motion.
Whether the intended κατακρημνίσαι of Luke 4:29 is a spontaneous extra-judicial lynching or an echo of the Jewish penalty of stoning, whose opening stage was precipitation from a height as described in Mishnah Sanhedrin 6:4.
- majorityAn improvised act of mob violence. Luke narrates no trial, no witnesses, and no legal procedure, v. 28 reports only that all in the synagogue were filled with wrath, and the episode falls on a Sabbath, when judicial punishment was not executed; precipitation was in any case not a recognized Jewish penalty in its own right.; Joseph A. Fitzmyer, The Gospel According to Luke I-IX, Anchor Bible 28 (Garden City: Doubleday, 1981), ad Luke 4:29; François Bovon, Luke 1: A Commentary on the Gospel of Luke 1:1-9:50, Hermeneia (Minneapolis: Fortress, 2002), ad Luke 4:29; Luke Timothy Johnson, The Gospel of Luke, Sacra Pagina 3 (Collegeville: Liturgical Press, 1991), ad Luke 4:29; Alfred Plummer, A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel According to S. Luke, ICC (Edinburgh: T. and T. Clark, 1896), ad Luke 4:29
- minorityAn echo of stoning by precipitation. The condemned is led outside the settlement to a predetermined height, matching the rabbinic account in which a witness pushes the condemned from a platform and stones follow only if the fall does not kill; the Mishnah is later evidence (codified around 200 CE) and idealized, so it is treated as suggestive background rather than proof of a fixed first-century rite.; I. Howard Marshall, The Gospel of Luke, NIGTC (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1978), ad Luke 4:29; John Nolland, Luke 1:1-9:20, WBC 35A (Dallas: Word, 1989), ad Luke 4:29; Josef Blinzler, Der Prozess Jesu, 4th ed. (Regensburg: Pustet, 1969)