to know: to hold a fact, a matter, or a person firmly in mind, whether by being aware of it, grasping it, or being acquainted with it
In the New Testament this verb is, for all practical purposes, another way of saying "know." It sits very close to the ordinary Greek verb for knowing, οἶδα (εἴδω), and the two are used almost interchangeably. Its exact shade depends on what is known: a fact one is aware of, a statement one grasps, or a person or thing one is familiar with.
When the thing known is a claim or a matter, the word tilts toward "understand" or "comprehend," as when Peter says he neither knows nor understands, or when a false teacher "understands nothing." When the object is a person or a practice, it means "be acquainted with," as in the demon's "Paul I know" or Apollos "knowing only the baptism of John." It differs a little from γινώσκω (γινώσκω), the verb for knowing that grows out of experience; most often, though, it simply means being aware that something is so.
The word also carries a faint formality that a translation cannot easily show. Every time it appears in Acts it is on the lips of a speaker, never in the narrator's voice, and the writer seems to reserve it for the polished openings of speeches, the equivalent of "as you well know." It keeps a distant echo of its history too: long before the New Testament it was the Greek word for expert, scientific knowledge, the ancestor of our word "epistemology." That technical sense has faded, but writers can still turn it against opponents who claim mastery yet, in their words, understand nothing.
Nuances
Whether ἐπίσταμαι here carries a distinct sense of instinctive, animal-level knowing set against οἶδα, or the contrast is supplied by the adverb "naturally/by instinct" and the simile "like irrational animals" while the two verbs remain near-synonyms.
- majorityThe contrast is carried by the adverb and the animal simile, not by any inherent difference between the two knowing-verbs.; R. J. Bauckham, Jude, 2 Peter (WBC 50), 63; J. H. Neyrey, 2 Peter, Jude (AYB 37C); T. R. Schreiner, 1, 2 Peter, Jude (NAC)
- minorityThe verb itself marks instinctive, sensory knowing over against rational or spiritual perception.; A. T. Robertson, Word Pictures in the New Testament, on Jude 10
Whether the two knowing-verbs in the demon's reply mark two genuinely different kinds of knowing (γινώσκω of Jesus, ἐπίσταμαι of Paul) or are stylistic variation with no difference in sense.
- majorityThe alternation is stylistic variety; the demon knows both figures, and no distinct sense should be read into either verb.; W. J. Larkin, Acts (BHGNT), 279; BDAG, s.v. ἐπίσταμαι; D. A. Carson, Exegetical Fallacies (2nd ed.), 51-54
- minorityThe two verbs mark different kinds of knowing, a fuller acquaintance with the human agent set against a more instinctive awareness of the divine.; M. R. Vincent, Word Studies in the New Testament, on Acts 19:15; I. H. Marshall, Acts (TNTC), 314