StrongerBible

epistamai

ἐπίσταμαι

GreekG1987know, understand, ...

Appears 14 times · tap a cell to see the verses

Mrk 14:68Act 10:28Act 15:7Act 18:25Act 19:15Act 19:25Act 20:18Act 22:19Act 24:10Act 26:261Ti 6:4Heb 11:8Jas 4:14Jud 1:10
Root family
Word studyResearch-gradeeh-PEE-stah-myverb

What epistamai means

to know: to hold a fact, a matter, or a person firmly in mind, whether by being aware of it, grasping it, or being acquainted with it

TranslatabilityApproximateCertaintyStrong

In the New Testament this verb is, for all practical purposes, another way of saying "know." It sits very close to the ordinary Greek verb for knowing, οἶδα (εἴδω), and the two are used almost interchangeably. Its exact shade depends on what is known: a fact one is aware of, a statement one grasps, or a person or thing one is familiar with.

When the thing known is a claim or a matter, the word tilts toward "understand" or "comprehend," as when Peter says he neither knows nor understands, or when a false teacher "understands nothing." When the object is a person or a practice, it means "be acquainted with," as in the demon's "Paul I know" or Apollos "knowing only the baptism of John." It differs a little from γινώσκω (γινώσκω), the verb for knowing that grows out of experience; most often, though, it simply means being aware that something is so.

The word also carries a faint formality that a translation cannot easily show. Every time it appears in Acts it is on the lips of a speaker, never in the narrator's voice, and the writer seems to reserve it for the polished openings of speeches, the equivalent of "as you well know." It keeps a distant echo of its history too: long before the New Testament it was the Greek word for expert, scientific knowledge, the ancestor of our word "epistemology." That technical sense has faded, but writers can still turn it against opponents who claim mastery yet, in their words, understand nothing.

Nuances

1ato be aware of a fact; to know that something is so, often as an appeal to what the hearer already knows
Act 10:28Act 15:7Act 19:25Act 20:18Act 22:19Act 24:10Act 26:26Heb 11:8Jas 4:14
1bto understand, to comprehend; to grasp the sense of what is said
Mrk 14:681Ti 6:4Jud 1:10
Jud 1:10

Whether ἐπίσταμαι here carries a distinct sense of instinctive, animal-level knowing set against οἶδα, or the contrast is supplied by the adverb "naturally/by instinct" and the simile "like irrational animals" while the two verbs remain near-synonyms.

  • majorityThe contrast is carried by the adverb and the animal simile, not by any inherent difference between the two knowing-verbs.; R. J. Bauckham, Jude, 2 Peter (WBC 50), 63; J. H. Neyrey, 2 Peter, Jude (AYB 37C); T. R. Schreiner, 1, 2 Peter, Jude (NAC)
  • minorityThe verb itself marks instinctive, sensory knowing over against rational or spiritual perception.; A. T. Robertson, Word Pictures in the New Testament, on Jude 10
1cto be acquainted with; to be familiar with a person or a thing
Act 18:25Act 19:15
Act 19:15

Whether the two knowing-verbs in the demon's reply mark two genuinely different kinds of knowing (γινώσκω of Jesus, ἐπίσταμαι of Paul) or are stylistic variation with no difference in sense.

  • majorityThe alternation is stylistic variety; the demon knows both figures, and no distinct sense should be read into either verb.; W. J. Larkin, Acts (BHGNT), 279; BDAG, s.v. ἐπίσταμαι; D. A. Carson, Exegetical Fallacies (2nd ed.), 51-54
  • minorityThe two verbs mark different kinds of knowing, a fuller acquaintance with the human agent set against a more instinctive awareness of the divine.; M. R. Vincent, Word Studies in the New Testament, on Acts 19:15; I. H. Marshall, Acts (TNTC), 314

What scholars say about epistamai

The standard lexica (BDAG; Paulsen in EDNT; Louw-Nida; Silva in NIDNTTE) treat the fourteen New Testament occurrences as ordinary verbs of knowing, understanding, or being acquainted with something, essentially synonymous with οἶδα. The word's older technical senses, Homeric "know-how" and the Aristotelian term for demonstrative science (ἐπιστήμη), have faded by the first century; neither the noun ἐπιστήμη nor Aristotle's cause-tracking sense appears in the New Testament. In the Septuagint it renders יָדַע most often, absorbing into the general Hebrew field of knowing. Louw-Nida places it in both Domain 28 (Know) and Domain 32 (Understand), the latter for propositional objects (Mark 14:68; 1 Timothy 6:4; Jude 10). Its distribution is the clearest marker of its register: all nine occurrences in Acts fall in reported speech, never narration, suggesting the author chose it as a more literary alternative to οἶδα for the openings of speeches. In 1 Timothy 6:4 and Jude 10 a faint classical flavor of expertise is turned ironically against opponents. The nineteenth-century synonymic tradition (Vincent; Vine; Wuest) assigned each knowing-verb its own territory, but twentieth-century linguistic work (Moulton; Robertson; BDF; Louw-Nida; Bultmann in TDNT) treats the three as broadly overlapping in Koine, with distinctions contextual and stylistic rather than lexical.

Where scholars disagree about epistamai

Whether the three main New Testament verbs for knowing (ἐπίσταμαι, οἶδα, γινώσκω) each keep a distinct sense or overlap as near-synonyms whose differences are only contextual and stylistic in Koine Greek.

  • majorityIn New Testament Koine the three verbs are broadly interchangeable, with any distinctions contextual and stylistic rather than fixed in the words themselves.; Louw-Nida, Greek-English Lexicon Based on Semantic Domains, sections 28 and 32; R. Bultmann, TDNT 1:689-719; M. Silva, NIDNTTE 2:371-72
  • minorityEach verb keeps its own semantic territory, with this word tied to knowledge from close acquaintance or expertise.; M. R. Vincent, Word Studies in the New Testament; K. Wuest, Word Studies in the Greek New Testament
In-depth research

This is a research paper, so it may be hard to read without scholarly background. It is useful if you want to dig even deeper into this word.

Sources

  • BDAG (Bauer-Danker-Arndt-Gingrich, 3rd ed.), p. 380, s.v. ἐπίσταμαιlexicon
  • H. Paulsen, EDNT 2:34-35, s.v. ἐπίσταμαιtheological-dictionary
  • Louw-Nida, Greek-English Lexicon Based on Semantic Domains, sections 28 and 32lexicon
  • M. Silva (ed.), NIDNTTE 2:371-72theological-dictionary
  • R. Bultmann, "γινώσκω κτλ.," TDNT 1:689-719theological-dictionary
  • C. Spicq, Theological Lexicon of the New Testament 1:344-47theological-dictionary
  • R. J. Bauckham, Jude, 2 Peter (WBC 50), 63commentary
  • W. J. Larkin, Acts: A Handbook on the Greek Text (BHGNT), 279commentary
  • D. A. Carson, Exegetical Fallacies (2nd ed.), 51-54monograph
  • F. Blass, A. Debrunner, R. Funk, A Greek Grammar of the New Testament, section 101grammar

All attested forms of ἐπίσταμαι

present middle-or-passive indicative 2p

ἐπίστασθε

Act 10:28, Act 15:7, Act 19:25, Act 20:18, Jas 4:14

present middle-or-passive participle nominative m s

ἐπιστάμενος

Act 18:25, Act 24:10, 1Ti 6:4, Heb 11:8

present middle-or-passive indicative 1s

ἐπίσταμαι

Mrk 14:68, Act 19:15

present middle-or-passive indicative 3p

ἐπίστανται

Act 22:19, Jud 1:10

present middle-or-passive indicative 3s

ἐπίσταται

Act 26:26