StrongerBible

egkentrizō

ἐγκεντρίζω

GreekG1461graft in, engraft

Appears 6 times · tap a cell to see the verses

Rom 11:17Rom 11:19Rom 11:23 (2×)Rom 11:24 (2×)
Compound of
Word studyeng-ken-TRID-zoverb

What egkentrizō means

to graft in: to set a cutting into a living tree so that it grows as part of that tree and draws life from its root

TranslatabilityDirectCertaintySettled

Grafting is ordinary farm work. A grower cuts a shoot from one plant, opens a slit in the trunk or the stump of a branch on another, fits the shoot into it, and binds the two together. If the join takes, the shoot is no longer a cutting resting against bark. It is part of that tree, fed by roots it never grew. This verb names that operation, and the word carries "in" inside it: the shoot does not simply get tied on, it goes into the host and becomes one plant with it.

Paul uses the word six times, all inside one stretch of Romans 11, and it appears nowhere else in the Bible. His picture is an olive tree, a familiar image for Israel. Some branches have been broken off (ἐκκλάω) or cut away (ἐκκόπτω), and a shoot from a wild olive has been fitted into the gap. That shoot stands for the non-Jewish believer, and the direction of the flow is Paul's whole point: the graft does not feed the tree, the root feeds the graft.

Two features of the picture carry the argument. The action is always done to the branch rather than by it, and God is the one doing it. And it can happen a second time: Paul says the branches that were removed can be grafted back into their own tree, and that this would be less surprising than the first grafting, not more.

Rom 11:17Rom 11:19Rom 11:23 (2×)Rom 11:24 (2×)

Disputed

Whether grafting a wild olive shoot into a cultivated olive tree reflects a real ancient farming practice or an operation Paul knowingly presents as unnatural.

  • majorityPaul describes a procedure growers would not normally perform, and admits as much when he calls it contrary to nature in Romans 11:24; the oddity of the image is deliberate and carries the argument.; A. G. Baxter and J. A. Ziesler, "Paul and Arboriculture: Romans 11:17-24," Journal for the Study of the New Testament 24 (1985); C. E. B. Cranfield, A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans, ICC, vol. 2 (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1979); James D. G. Dunn, Romans 9-16, Word Biblical Commentary 38B (Dallas: Word, 1988)
  • minorityRoman writers on agriculture describe grafting a wild shoot into a tired cultivated olive in order to reinvigorate it, so Paul's image reflects a technique available to him.; W. M. Ramsay, "The Olive-Tree and the Wild Olive," in Pauline and Other Studies in Early Christian History (London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1906); Columella, De Re Rustica 5.9.16

What scholars say about egkentrizō

The lexica are unanimous on the sense. BDAG and LSJ both give ἐγκεντρίζω the horticultural meaning "to graft in," a compound of κεντρίζω ("to prick, goad") with ἐν, matching the technical vocabulary of Greek and Roman agricultural writers. The discussion in the literature concerns not the lexical sense but the horticulture Paul presupposes in Romans 11:17-24. Ramsay argued from Columella (De Re Rustica 5.9.16) that grafting a wild shoot into a failing cultivated olive was a known method of reinvigorating the tree, making Paul's image agriculturally realistic. Baxter and Ziesler replied that the procedure was marginal at best and that Paul's own παρὰ φύσιν ("contrary to nature") in 11:24 concedes its strangeness. Most recent commentators (Cranfield, Dunn, Moo) follow the latter line and treat the reversal as rhetorically deliberate; Esler reads the olive image against ancient oleiculture and questions of ethnic identity. The verb's six occurrences are all passive or, in 11:23, an active infinitive with God as subject, which is the syntactic basis for the observation that the branch is never the agent.

Sources

  • BDAG, s.v. ἐγκεντρίζωlexicon
  • LSJ, s.v. ἐγκεντρίζωlexicon
  • C. E. B. Cranfield, A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans, ICC, vol. 2 (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1979)commentary
  • James D. G. Dunn, Romans 9-16, Word Biblical Commentary 38B (Dallas: Word, 1988)commentary
  • Douglas J. Moo, The Epistle to the Romans, NICNT (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1996)commentary
  • A. G. Baxter and J. A. Ziesler, "Paul and Arboriculture: Romans 11:17-24," Journal for the Study of the New Testament 24 (1985)journal-article
  • Philip F. Esler, "Ancient Oleiculture and Ethnic Differentiation: The Meaning of the Olive-Tree Image in Romans 11," Journal for the Study of the New Testament 26 (2003)journal-article
  • W. M. Ramsay, "The Olive-Tree and the Wild Olive," in Pauline and Other Studies in Early Christian History (London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1906)essay

All attested forms of ἐγκεντρίζω

aorist passive indicative 2s

ἐνεκεντρίσθης

Rom 11:17, Rom 11:24

future passive indicative 3p

ἐγκεντρισθήσονται

Rom 11:23, Rom 11:24

aorist active infinitive

ἐγκεντρίσαι

Rom 11:23

aorist passive subjunctive 1s

ἐγκεντρισθῶ

Rom 11:19