StrongerBible

ekkoptō

ἐκκόπτω

GreekG1581cut down, cut off, ...

Appears 10 times · tap a cell to see the verses

Mat 3:10Mat 5:30Mat 7:19Mat 18:8Luk 3:9Luk 13:7Luk 13:9Rom 11:22Rom 11:242Co 11:12
Compound of
Word studyek-KOP-tohverb

What ekkoptō means

to cut off or cut down: to sever something from what it grew on or belonged to, and be rid of it

TranslatabilityApproximateCertaintySettled

This verb joins the ordinary word for cutting to a prefix meaning "out of," and that is exactly what it pictures: something severed from the place it was attached to and then discarded. All ten New Testament uses keep that picture. What changes is only what gets cut. A tree is felled at the root, a hand is taken off and thrown away, a branch is cut out of the trunk it fed from, and in one case an opening someone was reaching for is taken away.

The uses hold together because the cut is always meant to be final and always costs something that was still living or still useful. The tree does not grow again where it stood. The hand is gone for good. The branch no longer draws anything from the root. Even the one use with no wood or flesh in view works the same way: what is removed is removed for good, not merely blocked for now.

In the Gospels this is the standard image for God's judgment on fruitlessness. John the Baptist says the axe is already lying at the root, and the fig tree in the vineyard gets one more year before the order is carried out. Paul then keeps the same picture in Romans 11, where Gentile believers are warned that they too can be cut off from the tree they were grafted into. Because English needs a different verb for each object (a tree is cut down, a hand cut off, a branch cut out), the thread running through these passages is easy to miss in translation, though the Greek uses one word throughout.

The cutting is severing, not pulling up: a plant torn out of the ground root and all takes a different verb (ἐκριζόω). The axe in Matthew 3:10 lies at the root, but what it does is go through the trunk.

Nuances

1ato cut down a tree: to fell it because it bears no fruit
TranslatabilityDirect
Mat 3:10Mat 7:19Luk 3:9Luk 13:7Luk 13:9
1bto cut off a hand or a foot: to take a limb off the body and throw it away
TranslatabilityDirect
Mat 5:30Mat 18:8
1cto cut a branch out of the tree it was growing on
Rom 11:22Rom 11:24
1dto take something away for good, so that no one can use it any longer
TranslatabilityPartial
2Co 11:12

What scholars say about ekkoptō

The lexicons are unanimous on the sense. BDAG gives two numbered senses under one entry: (1) to cut off or cut down, remove by cutting, covering the fruitless tree (Mt 3:10; 7:19; Lk 3:9; 13:7, 9), the offending limb (Mt 5:30; 18:8), and the olive branch (Rom 11:22, 24); and (2) a figurative use, to remove or do away with, for 2 Cor 11:12. LSJ documents a much wider classical range for the compound, including knocking out teeth or eyes, breaching walls and gates, and a derived use for hindering or frustrating, from which the older gloss "prevent" descends; that hindering use is not attested in the New Testament, where the verb consistently denotes severing. On the individual passages, Davies and Allison treat the imperative in Mt 5:30 as deliberate hyperbole within the antithesis and note Mark's use of the near-synonym apokopto in the parallel saying; Fitzmyer reads the vineyard order in Lk 13:7, 9 against the prophetic tradition of Israel as an unfruitful planting; Cranfield and Dunn take the passive in Rom 11:22 as horticultural language for removal from the place of covenant privilege, held in tension with the regrafting Paul asserts in 11:23-24; Thrall discusses the awkward double purpose clause of 2 Cor 11:12 and takes the object as the pretext or basis for boasting that Paul's refusal of support removes.

Sources

  • BDAG (Bauer-Danker-Arndt-Gingrich), s.v. ἐκκόπτωlexicon
  • LSJ (Liddell-Scott-Jones), s.v. ἐκκόπτωlexicon
  • W. D. Davies and Dale C. Allison, The Gospel According to Saint Matthew, ICC (1988-1997)commentary
  • Joseph A. Fitzmyer, The Gospel According to Luke, Anchor Bible (1981-1985)commentary
  • C. E. B. Cranfield, The Epistle to the Romans, ICC (1975-1979)commentary
  • James D. G. Dunn, Romans 9-16, Word Biblical Commentary (1988)commentary
  • Margaret E. Thrall, The Second Epistle to the Corinthians, ICC (1994-2000)commentary

All attested forms of ἐκκόπτω

aorist active imperative 2s

ἔκκοψον

Mat 5:30, Mat 18:8, Luk 13:7

present passive indicative 3s

ἐκκόπτεται

Mat 3:10, Mat 7:19, Luk 3:9

aorist active subjunctive 1s

ἐκκόψω

2Co 11:12

future active indicative 2s

ἐκκόψεις

Luk 13:9

second-aorist passive indicative 2s

ἐξεκόπης

Rom 11:24

second-future passive indicative 2s

ἐκκοπήσῃ

Rom 11:22