StrongerBible

damazō

δαμάζω

GreekG1150tame, subdue

Appears 4 times · tap a cell to see the verses

Mrk 5:4Jas 3:7 (2×)Jas 3:8
Root family
Akin to
Word studyResearch-gradedah-MAH-zohverb

What damazō means

to tame or subdue: bring a wild, violent, or unruly thing under control

TranslatabilityApproximateCertaintySettled

In everyday Greek this was the word for breaking a wild animal, above all a horse, to human control. That concrete picture of mastering a creature that fights the yoke stays alive under every New Testament use, even when the thing being brought under control is not an animal at all.

The New Testament stretches the word across three very different objects, yet the core act never changes: taking something wild or resistant and bringing it under mastery.

  • In James 3:7 it is literal, the whole animal kingdom broken in by human skill.
  • In Mark 5:4 it is a violent man whom no chains could hold.
  • In James 3:8 it is the tongue, which James calls the one thing no person can tame.

That one word carries all three jobs is the point of its most famous use. James lines up the taming of every kind of creature against the tongue that stays wild, echoing the old command to rule over the animals, and the surprise is that human mastery reaches everywhere except into its own mouth. Other Greek words for control come at it from different angles: mastering by sheer strength (κρατέω), or reining something in with a bridle (χαλιναγωγέω, the very image James uses a few verses earlier). This verb keeps the particular flavor of breaking in something wild and resistant.

Nuances

1ato tame a wild animal, breaking it to human control
TranslatabilityDirect
Jas 3:7 (2×)
1bto master or subdue something that fights back, whether a violent person or the unruly tongue
Mrk 5:4Jas 3:8
Jas 3:8

Whether the emphatic "no one of humans" in James 3:8 hints that God can tame the tongue even though people cannot.

  • majorityThe phrase deliberately leaves the divine option open: what humans cannot do, God can, pointing ahead to the wisdom from above later in the chapter.; Douglas J. Moo, The Letter of James (Pillar New Testament Commentary; Eerdmans, 2000); Scot McKnight, The Letter of James (NICNT; Eerdmans, 2011)
  • minorityThe phrase is rhetorical overstatement about the human condition, not a coded promise of divine help.; Martin Dibelius, James: A Commentary on the Epistle of James, rev. Heinrich Greeven (Hermeneia; Fortress, 1976)

What scholars say about damazō

The standard lexica agree closely on the sense. LSJ organizes the wider word group under the master gloss "overpower," with taming animals (especially horses) as the leading use; BDAG defines it as "to reduce from an uncontrolled to a controlled state, subdue, tame, control," covering all four New Testament occurrences; Louw-Nida (Domain 37) separates a general "control or restrain, with the implication of overcoming resistance" from a specialized "tame" sense for animals. Neither TDNT nor Spicq devotes an article to the word, reflecting its rarity and its narrative or paraenetic (rather than doctrinal) settings. The verb is a post-Homeric present formed beside the older athematic δάμνημι, resting on the Indo-European root behind Latin domare and English "tame," and it never wholly lost its Homeric resonance of warriors, animals, and even sleep or death being "subdued." In James 3:7 the fourfold classification of creatures (beasts, birds, reptiles, sea creatures) is widely read as an echo of the dominion mandate of Genesis 1:26-28 and 9:2 and of Psalm 8, and the paired present and perfect δαμάζεται καὶ δεδάμασται is debated as either a genuine aspectual pairing of ongoing capacity plus achieved result (Ropes, Davids, Moo, Johnson, Allison) or a rhetorical doubling for emphasis (Dibelius). Commentators also note that James reaches for this Homeric, animal-anchored verb rather than the Stoic vocabulary of self-mastery (κρατέω, νικάω) or Philo's prose verbs for gentling the passions, giving the untameable tongue its shock. On Mark 5:4 the critical commentators (France, Marcus, Collins, Gundry, Edwards) read the accumulated failed attempts at restraint as a foil that heightens the mastery of the exorcism that follows, without treating the taming verb as dehumanizing the man.

In-depth research

This is a research paper, so it may be hard to read without scholarly background. It is useful if you want to dig even deeper into this word.

Sources

  • Liddell-Scott-Jones, A Greek-English Lexicon, 9th ed. (Clarendon, 1940), s.v. δαμάζωlexicon
  • Bauer-Danker-Arndt-Gingrich (BDAG), A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament, 3rd ed. (Chicago, 2000), s.v. δαμάζωlexicon
  • Louw-Nida, Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament Based on Semantic Domains, 2nd ed. (1989), 37.2lexicon
  • Douglas J. Moo, The Letter of James (Pillar New Testament Commentary; Eerdmans, 2000)commentary
  • Peter H. Davids, The Epistle of James (NIGTC; Eerdmans, 1982)commentary
  • Luke Timothy Johnson, The Letter of James (Anchor Yale Bible; Doubleday, 1995)commentary
  • Dale C. Allison Jr., A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Epistle of James (ICC; Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2013)commentary
  • Martin Dibelius, James, rev. Heinrich Greeven (Hermeneia; Fortress, 1976)commentary
  • Robert H. Gundry, Mark: A Commentary on His Apology for the Cross (Eerdmans, 1993)commentary
  • Joel Marcus, Mark 1-8 (Anchor Yale Bible; Doubleday, 2000)commentary

All attested forms of δαμάζω

aorist active infinitive

δαμάσαι

Mrk 5:4, Jas 3:8

perfect passive indicative 3s

δεδάμασται

Jas 3:7

present passive indicative 3s

δαμάζεται

Jas 3:7