StrongerBible

teshuqah

תְּשׁוּקָה

HebrewH8669desire, longing, ...

Appears 3 times · tap a cell to see the verses

Gen 3:16Gen 4:7Sng 7:10(11)
Root family
Word studyResearch-gradeteh-shoo-KAHnoun

What teshuqah means

a strong, exclusive turning of one person or force toward another, an orientation that fixes attention and longing on its object

TranslatabilityPartialCertaintyContested

This rare word appears only three times in the Hebrew Bible, and all three uses share one core: someone or something is oriented wholly toward another, fixed on it. The word does not specify whether that pull is welcome or hostile, tender or predatory. The context decides. A wife is turned toward her husband, sin is turned toward Cain, a lover is turned toward his beloved. The same single-minded fixation runs through all three.

The three senses below are not three different meanings but one meaning shaped by who is doing the turning and toward whom. The woman's orientation in Genesis 3:16 is tragic, bound up with a husband who now rules over her. Sin's orientation in Genesis 4:7 is the crouching, predatory attention of something waiting to overpower Cain. The lover's orientation in Song of Songs 7:10 is glad and unburdened, with no rule or domination in sight. The contexts differ sharply, but the underlying picture is the same: a whole self bent toward one object.

The oldest translators read the word as turning or return rather than as desire, and the English word desire only became standard in the sixteenth century. Because the senses below trace contextual shades of one fixation, the word is best understood as a single concept rather than a cluster of unrelated meanings.

Nuances

1aa wife's exclusive orientation toward her husband, here under the burden of his rule over her
Gen 3:16
1bsin's predatory, single-minded fixation on the person it is poised to overpower
Gen 4:7
1ca lover's glad, wholehearted orientation toward the beloved, with no hint of rule or hierarchy
Sng 7:10(11)

Disputed

Whether this word in Genesis 3:16 (and the parallel in 4:7) names a woman's longing or devotion toward her husband, or a desire to control and dominate him, is the single most contested point in the interpretation of the word. The newer philological work goes further and argues the original sense was turning or focused devotion rather than desire at all.

  • minorityThe woman's orientation in Genesis 3:16 is a desire to control or contend with her husband, read by analogy to Genesis 4:7, where sin's orientation toward Cain is taken as a hostile drive to master him. This reading underlies the negative renderings in some modern study Bibles and the 2016 ESV's contrary to your husband.; Susan T. Foh, "What Is the Woman's Desire?" Westminster Theological Journal 37/3 (1974/75): 376-383; Victor P. Hamilton, The Book of Genesis: Chapters 1-17, NICOT (1990), 200-202; Bruce K. Waltke, Genesis: A Commentary (2001), 93-94
  • majorityThe woman's orientation is her continuing longing or devotion toward a husband who now rules over her, described as a consequence of the fall rather than commanded. This was the reading of classical Jewish, patristic, and Reformation interpreters and of most modern critical commentators.; Claus Westermann, Genesis 1-11: A Continental Commentary (1984), 262-263; Phyllis Trible, God and the Rhetoric of Sexuality (1978), 126-128; Gordon J. Wenham, Genesis 1-15, WBC 1 (1987), 81-82
  • minorityThe unifying sense across all three biblical occurrences and the seven Qumran instances is turning, return, or single-minded devotion, not desire. The dominant English desire rendering entered Western Bibles only in the sixteenth century, against an overwhelming earlier tradition of turning vocabulary.; Joel N. Lohr, "Sexual Desire? Eve, Genesis 3:16, and תְּשׁוּקָה," JBL 130/2 (2011): 227-246; Andrew A. Macintosh, "The Meaning of Hebrew תשׁוקה," JSS 61/2 (2016): 365-387; Janson C. Condren, "Toward a Purge of the Battle of the Sexes," JETS 60/2 (2017): 227-245

What scholars say about teshuqah

The etymology of this word is insecure: neither the proposed Hebrew root nor an Arabic cognate is unproblematic, and no firm Akkadian or Ugaritic cognate has been established. BDB glosses it as longing while flagging that the ancient versions seem to read a turning word; HALOT and DCH give desire or longing, with DCH registering the wider range supported by the seven occurrences in the Dead Sea Scrolls. The most striking feature of the early reception is that the pre-modern versions overwhelmingly render the word as turning or return rather than desire (the Septuagint with the turning words apostrophe and epistrophe, the Samaritan Pentateuch with a one-letter variant meaning your turning, the Peshitta and Old Latin with turning vocabulary). The modern desire rendering entered Western Bibles through Pagnini's 1528 Latin Bible and from there Tyndale, Geneva, and the King James. Recent philology by Joel Lohr (2011), Andrew Macintosh (2016), and Janson Condren (2017) argues that the unifying core is focused devotion or turning, which fits all three biblical occurrences and the seven Qumran instances without forcing the word to oscillate between longing, hostility, and resistance.

Where scholars disagree about teshuqah

Whether Genesis 4:7 should govern the meaning of Genesis 3:16 is itself disputed and is the methodological hinge of the control reading. Susan Foh's case depends on treating the two verses as semantically identical. Critics object that Genesis 4:7 is figurative (sin personified) while Genesis 3:16 is literal, that pressing the parallel would imply a husband should master his wife as Cain was told to master sin, and that the only other literal occurrence, Song of Songs 7:10, shows no hint of domination.

  • minorityThe near-identical wording of the two verses means the woman's orientation must carry the same hostile force as sin's orientation toward Cain.; Susan T. Foh, "What Is the Woman's Desire?" Westminster Theological Journal 37/3 (1974/75): 376-383
  • contestedThe parallel is real but cannot bear the weight of equating a wife with personified sin, and the literal Song of Songs 7:10 should be weighed alongside the figurative Genesis 4:7.; Irvin A. Busenitz, "Woman's Desire for Man: Genesis 3:16 Reconsidered," Grace Theological Journal 7/2 (1986): 203-212; Joel N. Lohr, "Sexual Desire? Eve, Genesis 3:16, and תְּשׁוּקָה," JBL 130/2 (2011): 227-246
In-depth research

This is a research paper, so it may be hard to read without scholarly background. It is useful if you want to dig even deeper into this word.

Sources

  • BDB, A Hebrew and English Lexicon of the Old Testament (1907), 1003lexicon
  • HALOT, The Hebrew and Aramaic Lexicon of the Old Testament, s.v. תְּשׁוּקָהlexicon
  • DCH, The Dictionary of Classical Hebrew, s.v. תְּשׁוּקָהlexicon
  • TDOT, Theological Dictionary of the Old Testament, s.v. תְּשׁוּקָהdictionary
  • Joel N. Lohr, "Sexual Desire? Eve, Genesis 3:16, and תְּשׁוּקָה," Journal of Biblical Literature 130/2 (2011): 227-246article
  • Andrew A. Macintosh, "The Meaning of Hebrew תשׁוקה," Journal of Semitic Studies 61/2 (2016): 365-387article
  • Janson C. Condren, "Toward a Purge of the Battle of the Sexes and 'Return' for the Original Meaning of Genesis 3:16b," Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society 60/2 (2017): 227-245article
  • Susan T. Foh, "What Is the Woman's Desire?" Westminster Theological Journal 37/3 (1974/75): 376-383article
  • Claus Westermann, Genesis 1-11: A Continental Commentary (1984), 262-263, 299-301commentary
  • Gordon J. Wenham, Genesis 1-15, Word Biblical Commentary 1 (1987), 81-82, 105-106commentary
  • Victor P. Hamilton, The Book of Genesis: Chapters 1-17, NICOT (1990), 200-202, 226-229commentary
  • Bruce K. Waltke, Genesis: A Commentary (2001), 93-94commentary
  • Phyllis Trible, God and the Rhetoric of Sexuality, Overtures to Biblical Theology (1978), 126-128, 159-161monograph
  • Marvin H. Pope, Song of Songs, Anchor Bible 7C (1977), 644-647commentary

All attested forms of תְּשׁוּקָה

f s construct

תְּשׁוּקָתוֹ

Gen 4:7, Sng 7:10

f s construct

תְּשׁוּקָתֵךְ

Gen 3:16