StrongerBible

tan

תַּן

HebrewH8565jackal, dragon, ...

Appears 15 times · tap a cell to see the verses

Job 30:29Psa 44:19(20)Isa 13:22Isa 34:13Isa 35:7Isa 43:20Jer 9:11(10)Jer 10:22Jer 14:6Jer 49:33Jer 51:37Lam 4:3Ezk 32:2Mal 1:3
Root family
Word studyTAHN (plural tan-NEEM)noun

What tan means

1

jackal: the howling wild dog of the wasteland, named almost always in the plural and almost always to say that a place has been emptied of people

TranslatabilityApproximateCertaintyStrong

This is the wild dog of the dry country: a scavenger that runs in packs, dens in rubble, and can be heard a long way off at night. Nobody in the Bible hunts one, sells one, or keeps one. Hebrew names it almost only in the plural, and almost only in poetry and prophecy, because the animal is brought in for what its presence proves rather than for itself.

What its presence proves is that the people are gone. The prophets made a fixed sentence out of it and then said it over one place after another:

  • Jerusalem is handed over to become a lair for them
  • the towns of Judah are left as a lair for them
  • Babylon becomes heaps of rubble, a lair for them
  • Hazor is to be their lair forever
  • the ruined strongholds of Edom become their haunt

The buildings can still be standing. In one line the animals are in the pleasant palaces themselves, and that is the sting: the rooms are intact and the animals have them.

From there the word reaches into human grief. The long carrying cry of these animals is the sound a mourner claims for himself, so Job says he has become their brother and Micah says he will howl as they do. The same creature that marks a ruined city marks a ruined life. Underneath all of it the animal stays a real animal with needs of its own: it nurses its young, it gasps for air when the water dries up, and it is named among the creatures that will thank God when he puts streams in the desert.

Nuances

1athe animal itself: the desert scavenger going about its own life, nursing its young, panting for water, counted among the creatures that owe God thanks
TranslatabilityDirect
Isa 43:20Jer 14:6Lam 4:3
1bthe tenant of a ruined place: the animal whose move into an emptied city or an abandoned stretch of country is the announcement that the people are gone
Psa 44:19(20)Isa 13:22Isa 34:13Isa 35:7Jer 9:11(10)Jer 10:22Jer 49:33Jer 51:37Mal 1:3
1cthe animal's howl as a picture of human grief: the drawn out night cry that a mourner claims as his own
Job 30:29Mic 1:8
2

the great water creature: the monster Pharaoh is addressed as, lying in the Nile, churning it up and fouling his own rivers

TranslatabilityPartialCertaintyContested

Ezekiel takes up a funeral song over Pharaoh and calls him two things at once: a lion among the nations, and this creature lying in the water. What follows is all water. He thrashes in his rivers, muddies the streams with his feet, and tramples their channels. Nothing in it fits a desert scavenger.

The spelling is the difficulty. The written letters here are exactly what the desert animal looks like in the plural, yet the verse needs one creature, in water, and the ancient translators all read one monster. So the standard lexicons and the major commentators take the word here to be a separate Hebrew noun, the one for the sea monster or serpent (תַּנִּין), with the wrong letter at the end. Three chapters earlier Pharaoh is called the same thing with the same spelling, and there it is read that way without argument.

Which creature that is remains argued. Some hear the Nile crocodile, the animal Egypt itself used as a badge of royal power. Some hear the old sea dragon of the stories Israel's neighbors told, borrowed to make Egypt sound cosmic rather than merely strong. Most now think Ezekiel meant both at once, because the taunt only works if the great beast in the water turns out to be something you can hook and drag ashore.

Ezk 32:2

Disputed

What creature Pharaoh is compared to when Ezekiel 32:2 calls him the tannim/tannin in the seas.

  • majorityBoth at once, and deliberately: the Nile crocodile that stood for Pharaoh's power and the ancient sea dragon of inherited myth are fused, so the taunt works on the political and the cosmic level together.; D. I. Block, The Book of Ezekiel, Chapters 25-48 (NICOT; Eerdmans, 1998), on 32:1-16; M. Greenberg, Ezekiel 21-37 (AB 22A; Doubleday, 1997), on 32:2
  • minorityA real river animal, the Nile crocodile, with the monster language functioning as poetic scale rather than as myth.; HALOT, ed. Koehler, Baumgartner, Stamm, trans. Richardson (Leiden: Brill, 1994-2000), s.v. תַּנִּין (giving "crocodile" for Ezekiel 29:3 and 32:2)
  • minorityThe cosmic sea dragon of the older combat traditions, applied to Egypt as a political figure rather than describing any actual animal.; W. Zimmerli, Ezekiel 2 (Hermeneia; Fortress, 1983), 109-112; J. Day, God's Conflict with the Dragon and the Sea (Cambridge University Press, 1985)

What scholars say about tan

The modern lexica are agreed: תַּן is the jackal (Canis aureus, the golden jackal of the Levant), attested only in the plural תַּנִּים (13x) and, once, in a feminine plural תַּנּוֹת (Mal 1:3). BDB (1906, 1072) glosses "jackal" and files the occurrences under the imagery of ruins, desert, and mourning; HALOT s.v. תַּן gives "jackal" and lists the cognate material; DCH vol. 8 treats תַּן as a lemma wholly separate from תַּנִּין; Gesenius 18 prints Schakal. NIDOTTE (#9379) states the warning explicitly: "the form tannîm is not to be confused with tannîn." Christian Frevel's TDOT article on תן/תַּנִּים (TDOT XV:712ff.) is the standard theological treatment and reads the noun primarily through its function in the desolation oracles, where its fixed partners are בְּנוֹת יַעֲנָה (ostriches), נָוֶה/מָעוֹן (haunt, lair), and שְׁמָמָה (desolation). The distribution is diagnostic: Isa 13:22; 34:13; 35:7; 43:20; Jer 9:10 (Eng 9:11); 10:22; 14:6; 49:33; 51:37; Mic 1:8; Ps 44:20 (Eng 44:19); Job 30:29; Mal 1:3, i.e. exclusively arid, ruined, or mournful settings, against תַּנִּין's aquatic and combat contexts. Number agreement, parallelism, and setting normally decide any given case; versional evidence breaks ties. Two loci are genuinely vexed. At Lam 4:3 the consonantal tradition and the ancient versions (LXX δράκοντες; Vulg. lamiae) point to the monster-lexeme, but the nursing predicate חָלְצוּ שַׁד forces the jackal, and modern critical translations (RSV, NRSV, NIV, ESV) read accordingly; Dobbs-Allsopp (Interpretation, 130-131) rehearses the case. At Ezek 32:2 (and its parallel Ezek 29:3) the MT writes כְּתַנִּים / הַתַּנִּים where the syntax requires a singular aquatic creature; BDB calls the final mem erroneous "by confusion with plural of [תַּן]", BHS proposes תַּנִּין, HALOT glosses "crocodile" for both verses, and LXX, Vulgate, Targum, and Peshitta all render a singular dragon. Zimmerli (Hermeneia, 109-112), Greenberg (AB 22A), and Block (NICOT) all accept the correction; the residual debate concerns whether the referent is the Nile crocodile (Sobek symbolism), the inherited chaos-dragon of the Ugaritic tnn tradition documented by Day, or a deliberate fusion of the two, which is now the commonest position. Zoological discussion of the animal itself (Tristram, Feliks, Firmage in ABD, Borowski) turns on the same Levantine canid confusion that dogs שׁוּעָל, but for תַּן the lexica register no comparable hesitation, since the passages consistently describe pack behaviour, carrion habitat, and a carrying nocturnal howl.

Sources

  • BDB, A Hebrew and English Lexicon of the Old Testament (Oxford: Clarendon, 1906), 1072lexicon
  • HALOT, ed. Koehler, Baumgartner, Stamm, trans. Richardson (Leiden: Brill, 1994-2000), s.v. תַּןlexicon
  • DCH vol. 8 (Sheffield Phoenix, 2011), s.v. תַּןlexicon
  • Gesenius, Hebraisches und Aramaisches Handworterbuch, 18th ed., ed. R. Meyer and H. Donner (Springer, 1987-2013), s.v.lexicon
  • C. Frevel, "תן / תַּנִּים," in Theological Dictionary of the Old Testament, vol. 15 (Eerdmans, 2015), 712ff.dictionary
  • NIDOTTE, ed. W. A. VanGemeren (Zondervan, 1997), no. 9379dictionary
  • E. Firmage, "Zoology (Fauna)," in Anchor Bible Dictionary, vol. 6 (Doubleday, 1992)dictionary
  • W. Zimmerli, Ezekiel 2 (Hermeneia; Fortress, 1983), 109-112commentary
  • M. Greenberg, Ezekiel 21-37 (AB 22A; Doubleday, 1997), on 32:2commentary
  • D. I. Block, The Book of Ezekiel, Chapters 25-48 (NICOT; Eerdmans, 1998), on 32:1-16commentary
  • F. W. Dobbs-Allsopp, Lamentations (Interpretation; Westminster John Knox, 2002), 130-131commentary
  • A. E. Hill, Malachi (AB 25D; Doubleday, 1998), on 1:2-5commentary
  • W. McKane, Jeremiah, vol. 1 (ICC; T&T Clark, 1986), on 9:10commentary
  • J. Day, God's Conflict with the Dragon and the Sea (Cambridge University Press, 1985)monograph
  • O. Borowski, Every Living Thing: Daily Use of Animals in Ancient Israel (AltaMira, 1998)monograph
  • Y. Feliks, The Animal World of the Bible (Tel Aviv: Sinai, 1962)monograph
  • H. B. Tristram, The Natural History of the Bible (London, 1867)monograph
  • Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia, ed. K. Elliger and W. Rudolph (Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft, 1977), apparatus at Ezekiel 29:3 and 32:2edition

All attested forms of תַּן

m p absolute

תַּנִּים

Job 30:29, Psa 44:19, Isa 13:22, Isa 34:13, Isa 35:7, Isa 43:20, Jer 9:11, Jer 10:22

f p construct

תַנּוֹת

Mal 1:3

m s absolute

תַּנִּים

Ezk 32:2