to urinate: in the Bible only ever inside the coarse phrase "one who urinates against a wall", a contemptuous way of saying "a male", used when a whole household is to be wiped out
The verb by itself simply means "to urinate". It never stands alone in the Hebrew Bible. All six times it appears, it appears in one frozen phrase, joined to the word for a wall: "one who urinates against a wall". The phrase means "a male", and it is only ever used in a sentence about killing every male of a family or a royal line.
What makes the phrase worth stopping over is that Hebrew had perfectly ordinary words available. There is a plain word for a male (זָכָר) and a plain word for a man (אִישׁ), and the speakers here step around both of them. Instead they reduce the men of a doomed house to a body function anyone can picture. It is chosen crudeness, and the choice is the message: the house being condemned is worth no better words than these.
All six uses share the same setting, an announcement or a report that a household has been erased down to its last male:
- David swears in anger that by morning he will leave Nabal's household not one male alive
- Abigail is told afterward that her quick action is what spared them
- a prophet tells Jeroboam that every male of his house will be cut off
- the usurper Zimri wipes out the house of Baasha and leaves it no male at all
- Elijah delivers the same sentence against Ahab
- the young prophet who anoints Jehu repeats that sentence as Jehu's commission
Because the words are so blunt, translators face a real choice. Say "every male" and the meaning is right but the insult vanishes; keep the literal wording, as older English Bibles did with "him that pisseth against the wall", and the crudeness survives but now reads as merely odd. Neither option gives an English reader what a Hebrew listener heard: a formula of doom that also spits on its target.
Disputed
Whether the phrase is a neutral term for a male person or a deliberately degrading epithet chosen for its shock value.
- contestedA coarse, deliberately chosen epithet whose rhetorical work is contempt: it appears exclusively in curses and reports of dynastic extermination, and the choice of this phrase over the available neutral terms for a male is self-aware. Increasingly the reading of recent literary and commentary work.; Robert Alter, The David Story: A Translation with Commentary of 1 and 2 Samuel (New York: Norton, 1999), on 1 Samuel 25:22; Mordechai Cogan and Hayim Tadmor, II Kings (AB 11; Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1988), 107; Claude Mariottini, Rereading the Biblical Text (Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock, 2017), ch. 22, 72-77
- contestedAn idiomatic, if earthy, designation for a male, adequately rendered "every male"; the reference lexica gloss it as a synonym for a male person and assign the connotation no independent weight.; HALOT, s.v. שׁתן; David J. A. Clines, ed., The Dictionary of Classical Hebrew, vol. VIII (Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix, 2011), s.v. שׁתן