StrongerBible

rush

רוּשׁ

HebrewH7326poor

Appears 24 times · tap a cell to see the verses

1Sa 18:232Sa 12:12Sa 12:32Sa 12:4Psa 34:10(11)Psa 82:3Pro 10:4Pro 13:7Pro 13:8Pro 13:23Pro 14:20Pro 17:5Pro 18:23Pro 19:1Pro 19:7Pro 19:22Pro 22:2Pro 22:7Pro 28:3
Root family
Word studyResearch-graderooshverb

What rush means

to be poor, to lack property: the condition of having little or nothing, set plainly against being rich

TranslatabilityPartialCertaintyStrong

This Hebrew verb describes a straightforward economic condition: not having enough, being the kind of person who stands without property or resources. It serves as both an adjective ("a poor man") and a noun ("the poor"), and it appears overwhelmingly in the wisdom literature of Proverbs, where it is the book's workhorse term for describing people at the lower end of the wealth scale. Its consistent opposite is עָשִׁיר, the word for "the rich", the rich-versus-poor contrast in Proverbs is almost always stated with this word on one side (Prov 22:2; 22:7; 28:6; 29:13).

What makes this word distinctive among Hebrew's several terms for the poor is its register: it is, as scholars from Wittenberg to Fox to Pleins have put it, the morally underdetermined term. It does not automatically code the poor person as a pious sufferer or as the victim of injustice: those connotations belong to other Hebrew words for the poor. This word is descriptive and sociological, naming a state of material lack without pre-judging its cause or loading it with theological weight. That is precisely why Proverbs can deploy the same word both to describe the lazy man whose slack hands produce poverty (10:4) and to defend the dignity of the poor person whose integrity outweighs the rich man's dishonesty (19:1; 28:6).

The word carries this same economic flatness into the narrative texts. When David protests to Saul that he is "a poor and lightly regarded man" (1 Sam 18:23), he is making a claim about social standing and the size of a dowry, the language is transactional. When Nathan constructs his parable of the rich man who took a poor man's one ewe lamb (2 Sam 12:1, 3, 4), the choice of this word over עָנִי, the word for "afflicted", is deliberate: the case is presented as a plain property crime, not a case of oppression, so that David will judge it on its economic merits and unknowingly condemn himself. The LXX translators recognized the register: in Proverbs they consistently render it as penes (the laboring person of limited means) rather than ptochos (the beggar, the destitute), tracking the Hebrew's matter-of-fact tone.

The word has no certain relatives in Akkadian, Ugaritic, Arabic, or Aramaic, which is unusual for a common Hebrew root. BDB, HALOT, and DCH all treat it as a native Hebrew word of uncertain outside origin, and TWOT simply calls it a "primitive root," a scholarly shorthand for acknowledging that its origin is unknown.

Nuances

1a
1Sa 18:232Sa 12:12Sa 12:32Sa 12:4Psa 34:10(11)Psa 82:3Pro 10:4Pro 13:8Pro 13:23Pro 14:20Pro 17:5Pro 18:23
1bto pretend to be poor, to make oneself out to be without means
Pro 13:7

What scholars say about rush

The standard lexicons (BDB, HALOT, DCH) agree on a single root meaning "to be poor, be in want," with the participle functioning as a noun. The word's most striking feature is its near-total confinement to Proverbs and wisdom literature, and its consistent antonym עָשִׁיר. Scholars from Kuschke (ZAW 57, 1939) to Wittenberg (Scriptura S2, 1986) have shown that רָשׁ is the "class term" for the propertyless, distinguishable from עָנִי (the afflicted) and אֶבְיוֹן (the destitute) by its morally underdetermined register. Raymond Van Leeuwen's study of wealth and poverty in Proverbs (Hebrew Studies 33, 1992) shows how this neutrality enables the book's famous tension between act-consequence and protest: the same word appears in both the laziness-poverty sayings and the dignity-of-the-poor sayings without contradiction. The LXX's consistent rendering of רָשׁ as πένης rather than πτωχός, documented by Bammel in TDNT 6, independently confirms the sociological register. On the etymology, BDB, HALOT, and DCH concur that the root has no confident external cognates.

Where scholars disagree about rush

Whether the four core Hebrew poverty terms (רָשׁ, עָנִי, אֶבְיוֹן, דַּל) are genuinely distinct in meaning or broadly interchangeable within Proverbs, with distribution explained by genre and authorial preference.

  • majorityThe terms are semantically stratified: רָשׁ is the neutral class term for the propertyless, עָנִי the afflicted, אֶבְיוֹן the destitute beggar, and דַּל the socially weak. Genre and connotation differ even where semantic ranges overlap.; Wittenberg, G. H., 'The Lexical Context of the Terminology for "Poor" in the Book of Proverbs,' Scriptura S2, 1986; TDOT, s.v. דַּל (Fabry); TDOT, s.v. אֶבְיוֹן (Fabry)
  • minorityThe four terms are broadly interchangeable in Proverbs, functioning as near-synonyms whose distribution reflects authorial variation and poetic preference more than consistent semantic distinction.; Whybray, R. N., Wealth and Poverty in the Book of Proverbs, JSOTSup 99, Sheffield Academic Press, 1990; Fox, Michael V., Proverbs 10-31, Anchor Yale Bible, Yale University Press, 2009; Murphy, Roland E., Proverbs, WBC 22, Thomas Nelson, 1998

Whether Proverbs' preference for רָשׁ over the prophetic poverty vocabulary reflects an elite urban ideology that views poverty as deserved, or whether the book maintains a genuinely balanced view of the poor.

  • majorityProverbs maintains a balanced view: the same word appears in act-consequence sayings (laziness causes poverty) and in dignity-of-the-poor sayings (the poor person of integrity outweighs the rich liar). The tension is intentional, not ideological.; Waltke, Bruce K., The Book of Proverbs, NICOT, Eerdmans, 2004-2005; Van Leeuwen, Raymond C., 'Wealth and Poverty: System and Contradiction in Proverbs,' Hebrew Studies 33, 1992; Sandoval, Timothy J., The Discourse of Wealth and Poverty in the Book of Proverbs, Brill, 2006
  • minorityProverbs' preference for the detached, observational vocabulary of the wisdom school (including רָשׁ) expresses an urban-elite worldview that tends to see poverty as the poor person's own fault.; Pleins, J. David, The Social Visions of the Hebrew Bible, Westminster John Knox, 2001; Pleins, J. David, 'Poor, Poverty (OT),' Anchor Bible Dictionary 5, 1992, pp. 402-414
In-depth research

This is a research paper, so it may be hard to read without scholarly background. It is useful if you want to dig even deeper into this word.

Sources

  • BDB, s.v. רוּשׁ, pp. 439-40lexicon
  • HALOT, s.v. רוּשׁ, pp. 1229-30lexicon
  • DCH, s.v. רושlexicon
  • TWOT, s.v. רוּשׁlexicon
  • Wittenberg, G. H., 'The Lexical Context of the Terminology for "Poor" in the Book of Proverbs,' Scriptura S2, 1986monograph
  • Van Leeuwen, Raymond C., 'Wealth and Poverty: System and Contradiction in Proverbs,' Hebrew Studies 33, 1992monograph
  • Pleins, J. David, 'Poor, Poverty (OT),' Anchor Bible Dictionary 5, 1992, pp. 402-414dictionary
  • Pleins, J. David, The Social Visions of the Hebrew Bible, Westminster John Knox, 2001monograph
  • Bammel, Ernst, 'ptochos,' TDNT 6, 1968, pp. 885-915dictionary
  • Waltke, Bruce K., The Book of Proverbs, NICOT, 2 vols., Eerdmans, 2004-2005commentary
  • Fox, Michael V., Proverbs 10-31, Anchor Yale Bible, Yale University Press, 2009commentary
  • Murphy, Roland E., Proverbs, WBC 22, Thomas Nelson, 1998commentary
  • Longman, Tremper III, Proverbs, BCOT, Baker Academic, 2006commentary
  • McCarter, P. Kyle, I Samuel, Anchor Bible, Doubleday, 1980commentary
  • Sandoval, Timothy J., The Discourse of Wealth and Poverty in the Book of Proverbs, VTSup, Brill, 2006monograph

All attested forms of רוּשׁ

qal participle m s absolute

רָשׁ, רָאשׁ

1Sa 18:23, 2Sa 12:3, Psa 82:3, Pro 13:8, Pro 14:20, Pro 17:5, Pro 18:23, Pro 19:1

qal participle m p absolute

רָאשִׁים, רָשִׁים

Pro 13:23, Pro 22:7

hithpael participle m s absolute

מִתְרוֹשֵׁשׁ

Pro 13:7

qal perfect 3cp

רָשׁוּ

Psa 34:10