StrongerBible

perat

פְּרָת

HebrewH6578Proper NounEuphrates

Appears 19 times · tap a cell to see the verses

Gen 2:14Gen 15:18Deu 1:7Deu 11:24Jos 1:42Sa 8:32Ki 23:292Ki 24:71Ch 5:91Ch 18:32Ch 35:20Jer 13:4Jer 13:5Jer 13:6Jer 13:7
Word studyResearch-gradepeh-RAHTproper noun

What perat means

the Euphrates: the great river of Mesopotamia, which Israel's Scriptures treat as the far northern edge of the promised land

TranslatabilityDirectCertaintySettled

Perath is not really a Hebrew word at all. It is a Mesopotamian river name, handed down from Sumerian through Akkadian and taken into Hebrew and Aramaic just as it stood. That is why writers so often attach the ordinary word for a river to it (נָהָר), giving "the river Perath": a foreign name needed a plain label beside it. It also means the name says nothing in Hebrew, however much it may sound like the Hebrew verb meaning "to be fruitful." Because everyone knew which river was meant, Hebrew writers could also drop the name altogether and speak simply of "the River."

In a few places nothing more is meant than the river itself, a real waterway on a real map. Pharaoh Necho marches north to fight at Carchemish beside it, and Babylon's army meets him there. Far more often, though, the river marks a limit. It stands at the outer edge of the land promised to Abraham's descendants, at the outer edge of the ideal territory described to Israel before the conquest, and at the point David's northern campaign reached. Its great partner river, the Tigris (חִדֶּקֶל), never carries any of this weight. The Euphrates does, because for Israel it was where the known world ran out.

Followed through the Bible, the name traces an arc:

  • in Eden it is one of four rivers watering the world
  • in the promise and the conquest texts it is the far edge of the gift
  • under David it is how far a king's arm could reach
  • in Judah's final years it is where the empires collide and Judah's future is settled
  • at the close of Jeremiah's oracles against Babylon it is the water that swallows a scroll as a sign that Babylon will sink and never rise

Nuances

1athe river named last among the four that branch out of the single stream of Eden
Gen 2:14
1bthe far northern and eastern limit of the land promised to Israel, and of the ground its tribes held
Gen 15:18Deu 1:7Deu 11:24Jos 1:41Ch 5:9
1cthe outer reach of David's power, the point his northern campaign carried him to
2Sa 8:31Ch 18:3
1dthe frontier where the great empires met, fought, and had their fortunes settled
2Ki 23:292Ki 24:72Ch 35:20Jer 46:2Jer 46:6Jer 46:10Jer 51:63
1ethe place the prophet was sent to bury a linen belt and later dig it up, named with this word though perhaps not the great river itself
TranslatabilityPartialCertaintyContested
Jer 13:4Jer 13:5Jer 13:6Jer 13:7
Jer 13:4

Where Jeremiah was sent to bury the linen belt. The name is written without the usual word for river, and a literal round trip to the Euphrates from Anathoth would run some 700 miles and be made twice, whereas the Benjaminite village of Parah (Joshua 18:23), plausibly Khirbet Farah beside the spring of Ayn Fara, lies about three and a half miles from Anathoth and differs from the river name by one consonant. A further argument is structural: unlike Jeremiah's other sign acts, the meaning of this one is explained to the prophet himself (13:9-11) rather than performed before the people, which weakens the case for a literal long journey.

  • majorityThe nearby village of Parah is meant, its name chosen as a deliberate near echo of the Euphrates so that the ruined belt points to Babylonian corruption.; W. McKane, Jeremiah, International Critical Commentary (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1986), 1:285-292; J. R. Lundbom, Jeremiah 1-20, Anchor Bible 21A (New York: Doubleday, 1999), 670-671; J. Bright, Jeremiah, Anchor Bible 21 (Garden City: Doubleday, 1965), 96
  • contestedThe Euphrates itself is meant literally, with Babylon in view as the agent of Judah's ruin.; R. P. Carroll, Jeremiah, Old Testament Library (London: SCM, 1986), on Jeremiah 13; Septuagint of Jeremiah 13, which renders the name Εὐφράτης
  • minorityThe errand was never physically performed; the account is a symbolic vision.; B. Duhm, Das Buch Jeremia (Tübingen: Mohr, 1901), on Jeremiah 13; P. Volz, Der Prophet Jeremia, Kommentar zum Alten Testament (1922), on Jeremiah 13; W. Rudolph, Jeremia, Handbuch zum Alten Testament 12, 3rd ed. (Tübingen: Mohr, 1968), on Jeremiah 13

Disputed

Where the name itself came from, and whether it means anything in its own right. פְּרָת has no living Hebrew root, and the transmission chain is agreed in outline: Sumerian Buranun(a), written UD.KIB.NUN, was taken into Akkadian as Purattu, from which descend Hebrew פְּרָת, Syriac Prat, and Arabic al-Furat. What remains open is the origin of the Sumerian form. Two popular derivations are folk etymologies rather than live scholarly options: the link to Hebrew פרה "be fruitful" is a Hebrew reinterpretation, and the εὖ heard in Greek Εὐφράτης reflects Old Persian Ufratu(s), whose prothetic vowel Greek speakers read as their own word for "good" (Kent judged the Persian form itself a popular etymologizing of a local non-Iranian name).

  • majorityThe name belongs to an unrecorded pre-Sumerian substrate language: Sumerian and Akkadian inherited it rather than coined it, so no meaning is recoverable.; BDB, s.v. פְּרָת; HALOT, s.v. פְּרָת; R. G. Kent, Old Persian: Grammar, Texts, Lexicon, 2nd ed. (New Haven: American Oriental Society, 1953), 176
  • minorityThe name derives from a proto-Sumerian word for copper, burudu, the Euphrates being the river down which copper ore was carried.; T. V. Gamkrelidze and V. V. Ivanov, proposal deriving the river name from proto-Sumerian burudu (copper)

What scholars say about perat

The standard lexicons treat פְּרָת as a proper noun with no Hebrew root: BDB lists it simply as a proper name of a river, the Euphrates, noting Assyrian Purattu and the derived Old Persian Ufratu, and HALOT and Gesenius likewise classify it as a loan toponym. The transmission chain is agreed in outline: Sumerian Buranun(a), written logographically UD.KIB.NUN and attested already in third millennium texts from Shuruppak and pre-Sargonic Nippur, passed into Akkadian as Purattu, whence Hebrew פְּרָת, Syriac Prat, and Arabic al-Furat; Greek Εὐφράτης derives not from the Semitic form but from Old Persian Ufratu(s), mediated through Elamite, and Kent judged that Persian form itself a popular etymologizing of a local non-Iranian name. BDB analyses the distribution closely: the fuller phrase נְהַר־פְּרָת stands at Genesis 15:18, Deuteronomy 1:7, and Joshua 1:4 (the latter two with הַנָּהָר הַגָּדֹל), at 2 Samuel 8:3 (Qere), Jeremiah 46:2, 6, 10, and 1 Chronicles 5:9 and 18:3, while the bare name stands alone at Genesis 2:14 and in Jeremiah 13:4-7. Most read the נְהַר element as explanatory apposition, attached because the name was foreign, and note that הַנָּהָר used absolutely very often denotes the Euphrates (Genesis 31:21; Exodus 23:31; Joshua 24:2-3; 1 Kings 4:21; frequently in Ezra), the Nile being the competing referent only where the context is Egyptian. On Genesis 2:14 Westermann reads the river passage as a statement that the world receives life and fertility from the four rivers rather than as a map, a cosmological line developed by Stordalen; the hydrological oddity of one stream branching into four great systems is what drives many commentators toward a symbolic reading. For the boundary texts, students of Deuteronomic geography (Weinfeld, Kallai, Na'aman) treat the Euphrates limit as a literary and ideological tradition rather than a description of settled territory, Collins summarises the mainstream skepticism about a Davidic or Solomonic empire reaching the river, and Japhet notes the Chronicler's theological heightening of that reach. Jeremiah 46:2 is anchored historically by the Babylonian Chronicle's record of Nebuchadnezzar defeating Necho at Carchemish in 605 BCE. Jeremiah 13:1-11 is the crux: Carroll retains the literal Euphrates, McKane, Bright, and Lundbom favour Parah near Anathoth with a deliberate near-homophone evoking the great river, and Duhm, Volz, and Rudolph read the episode as a vision never performed; Southwood's 1979 Vetus Testamentum article is the standard focused treatment, and the Septuagint's Εὐφράτης at Jeremiah 13 shows the earliest translators taking it as the river. Genesis 49:22 (בֵּן פֹּרָת) is a different word, read either from פרה "be fruitful" or, with Speiser and the 1985 JPS translation as explained by Sarna, as "wild ass"; the consonantal overlap with the river name is accidental. In later reception the boundary tradition is elaborated in Jubilees 8-9 and the Genesis Apocryphon (1QapGen 21), and Revelation 9:14 and 16:12 make the river Rome's eastern frontier and then the water dried up to open a way, read against the Nero legend by Aune and Bauckham and typologically against Cyrus's diversion of the Euphrates (Herodotus 1.191) by Beale, with Koester cautioning that a Parthian invasion was no live danger in the late first century.

In-depth research

This is a research paper, so it may be hard to read without scholarly background. It is useful if you want to dig even deeper into this word.

Sources

  • BDB, s.v. פְּרָתlexicon
  • HALOT, s.v. פְּרָתlexicon
  • BDB, s.v. נָהָרlexicon
  • R. G. Kent, Old Persian: Grammar, Texts, Lexicon, 2nd ed. (New Haven: American Oriental Society, 1953), 176reference
  • C. Westermann, Genesis 1-11: A Commentary, trans. J. J. Scullion (Minneapolis: Augsburg, 1984), 217commentary
  • T. Stordalen, Echoes of Eden: Genesis 2-3 and Symbolism of the Eden Garden in Biblical Hebrew Literature (Leuven: Peeters, 2000)monograph
  • Z. Kallai, Historical Geography of the Bible: The Tribal Territories of Israel (Jerusalem: Magnes, 1986)monograph
  • J. J. Collins, Introduction to the Hebrew Bible (Minneapolis: Fortress), on 2 Samuel 8monograph
  • S. Japhet, The Ideology of the Book of Chronicles and Its Place in Biblical Thought (Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 1989)monograph
  • W. McKane, Jeremiah, International Critical Commentary (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1986), 1:285-292commentary
  • J. R. Lundbom, Jeremiah 1-20, Anchor Bible 21A (New York: Doubleday, 1999), 670-671commentary
  • J. Bright, Jeremiah, Anchor Bible 21 (Garden City: Doubleday, 1965), 96commentary
  • W. L. Holladay, Jeremiah 1, Hermeneia (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1986), 396commentary
  • R. P. Carroll, Jeremiah, Old Testament Library (London: SCM, 1986), on Jeremiah 13commentary
  • C. H. Southwood, The Spoiling of Jeremiah's Girdle (Jer 13:1-11), Vetus Testamentum 29/2 (1979): 231-237article
  • N. M. Sarna, Genesis, JPS Torah Commentary (Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society, 1989), on Genesis 49:22commentary
  • E. A. Speiser, Genesis, Anchor Bible 1 (Garden City: Doubleday, 1964), on Genesis 49:22commentary
  • G. K. Beale, The Book of Revelation, New International Greek Testament Commentary (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1999), on Revelation 16:12commentary
  • C. R. Koester, Revelation, Anchor Yale Bible 38A (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2014), 657commentary
  • D. E. Aune, Revelation, Word Biblical Commentary 52A-52C (Dallas: Word, 1997-1998), on Revelation 9:14commentary
  • R. Bauckham, The Climax of Prophecy (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1993), Nero and the Beastmonograph
  • A. K. Grayson, Assyrian Rulers of the Early First Millennium BC, Royal Inscriptions of Mesopotamia Assyrian Periods (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1991)critical-edition
  • Herodotus, Histories 1.191primary-source
  • Babylonian Chronicle, on the battle of Carchemish in 605 BCE (British Museum)primary-source

All attested forms of פְּרָת

noun

פְּרָת, פְּרָתָ

Gen 2:14, Gen 15:18, Deu 1:7, Deu 11:24, Jos 1:4, 2Sa 8:3, 2Ki 23:29, 2Ki 24:7