StrongerBible

orlah

עׇרְלָה

HebrewH6190foreskin, uncircumcised, ...

Appears 16 times · tap a cell to see the verses

Gen 17:11Gen 17:14Gen 17:23Gen 17:24Gen 17:25Gen 34:14Exo 4:25Lev 12:3Lev 19:23Deu 10:16Jos 5:31Sa 18:251Sa 18:272Sa 3:14Jer 4:4Jer 9:25(24)
Root family
Word studyResearch-gradeor-LAHnoun

What orlah means

foreskin: the fold of skin cut away in circumcision, and more broadly any natural covering that seals a thing off from the use it was made for

TranslatabilityPartialCertaintyStrong

The plain sense is the fold of skin removed when a male is circumcised. Genesis 17 uses the word five times as God makes circumcision the sign of his covenant with Abraham's household, and the law later fixes the act on a baby's eighth day. Because what is cut away is a real object, it can be handled and counted: David paid a bride price of a hundred of them, and Joshua left a heap of them at a place afterward called the hill of the foreskins.

But Hebrew writers also used this word of things with no body at all. Behind every use is one picture: a covering that seals something shut and keeps it from doing what it was made to do.

  • a heart so wrapped up that it cannot answer God
  • the fruit of a newly planted tree, closed off and not to be eaten for three years
  • a person still bearing the mark of an outsider to the covenant

The Leviticus fruit law is the clearest evidence that the word is not simply a term of anatomy. A tree has no foreskin, yet the law tells Israel to treat the young fruit as one. Most modern reference works therefore take the core idea to be something like "sealed off" or "off limits," with the body part as one settled use of that idea rather than the source of all the others.

The matching adjective (עָרֵל) describes the person or the body part that still has its covering, while this noun names the covering itself. The ordinary verb for taking it away is a different word (מוּל), which is why the two so often appear in the same sentence: you circumcise the foreskin.

Nuances

1athe fold of skin cut away when a male is circumcised: the piece of flesh the rite removes
TranslatabilityDirect
Gen 17:11Gen 17:14Gen 17:23Gen 17:24Gen 17:25Exo 4:25Lev 12:3
1bsevered foreskins as countable objects: war trophies, or the pile left after a mass circumcision
TranslatabilityDirect
Jos 5:31Sa 18:251Sa 18:272Sa 3:14
1cthe foreskin as the mark of standing outside the covenant people: to still have one is to be counted an outsider
TranslatabilityApproximate
Gen 34:14Jer 9:25(24)
1dthe covering over a person's heart: whatever seals someone off from answering God
Deu 10:16Jer 4:4
1ethe covering over a young tree's fruit, which is closed off from use for its first three years
CertaintyContested
Lev 19:23
Lev 19:23

What ʿorlah means in Leviticus 19:23, where the law tells Israel to treat the fruit of a newly planted tree as its foreskin for three years.

  • majorityThe root here carries its underlying sense of "closed off, blocked, off limits": the command bars the fruit from human use rather than identifying the fruit with a foreskin. The cognate accusative construction cannot mean "cut", since the Priestly writer had mul, gazar, karat, and batar available for that, and the ancient versions (LXX, Onqelos, Vulgate) all render it as removal or distancing.; Jacob Milgrom, Leviticus 17-22 (AB 3A; New York: Doubleday, 2000), 1677-1684; HALOT, s.v. ערלה
  • minorityThe fruit itself is the tree's foreskin: young fruit is left uneaten on the tree exactly as a foreskin is left on an uncircumcised male, which makes this law the interpretive key to circumcision as a rite of consecrated fertility.; Howard Eilberg-Schwartz, The Savage in Judaism (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1990), 141-176, esp. 149-150
  • minorityThe word here means "forbidden" or "tabu", integrating the law with the firstfruits principle that the opening produce of any life cycle belongs to YHWH and is released for human use only afterward.; Baruch A. Levine, Leviticus (JPS Torah Commentary; Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society, 1989), ad loc.

What scholars say about orlah

The root ערל is instantiated by three lemmas: this feminine noun (16x), the adjective/substantive עָרֵל (35x), and the verb עָרַל (2x, Lev 19:23 and the contested Hab 2:16). BDB (790-791) treats the verb as denominative and possibly artificial, since the primary verb for the ritual act is מוּל. Comparative Semitic phonology has settled the long etymological dispute in favor of an original *ġ: Arabic غُرْلة (ġurla) and أَغْرَل (aġral) preserve the sibilant that Hebrew, Aramaic, and Akkadian merge into ʿ or lose, the same law behind עֲמֹרָה = Γομορρα. Militarev and Kogan accordingly reconstruct Proto-Semitic *ġurl-at-, with reflexes in Akkadian urullu, Jewish Aramaic ʿorlā, Syriac ʿūrlā, and Arabic ġurla; Huehnergard endorses it. The Akkadian datum is a control: Mesopotamia did not practice circumcision, so urullu is purely anatomical, which implies that whatever ritual weight ערל carries in Hebrew is a secondary West Semitic elaboration of a common Semitic anatomical term.

On semantic priority, contemporary lexicography (HALOT, Mayer in TDOT XI:349-352, Gesenius 18th ed., NIDOTTE) reverses the older Gesenius/BDB derivation from "loose, projecting" and takes the core sense to be "closed, sealed, covering," with the prepuce a specialized application. Milgrom (AB 3A:1677-1684) reaches the same conclusion from the Levitical fruit law, and Malul converges on it anthropologically, treating the ערל field as part of a biblical epistemology in which bodily organs are loci of cognitive and social control.

On the sixteen occurrences of the noun: Genesis 17 (P) contains five and is the locus classicus. Westermann stresses that P did not invent circumcision but transformed it, detaching an existing West Semitic rite from puberty and marriage and re-inscribing it as an אוֹת בְּרִית imposed on the eighth day; Wenham notes the pun binding the failure to be cut (מול) to the penalty of being cut off (נכרת); Fox sets it within P's typology of covenantal signs. Genesis 34 and Exodus 4:24-26 are the two texts used to reconstruct the pre-Priestly history of the rite. Propp (VT 43 [1993]: 495-518; AB 2:233-241) reads Exodus 4 as preserving a J apotropaic and initiatory stratum in which the foreskin's blood wards off a nocturnal assailant; Levenson reads it as evidence of circumcision as a sublimation of firstborn sacrifice; Childs was skeptical that the passage's original meaning is recoverable at all. Bernat argues the reverse of Propp on Exodus 6:12: P coined the "blocked lips" idiom because it needed a category for a removable bodily impediment, which טמא and its neighbors could not supply.

Deuteronomy 10:16 and Jeremiah 4:4 share the heart idiom, and its origin is disputed. Weinfeld reads the Deuteronomic imperative as the internalization of treaty loyalty and Tigay glosses ערלה there as spiritual impediment, with 30:6 the divine complement of the human command; Lemke argues that Deut 10:16 is a later interpolation borrowed from Jeremiah, while Meade rebuts him from the concentric structure of Deut 10:12-22. Holladay and Lundbom defend Jer 4:4 as genuinely Jeremianic; Carroll and McKane treat it as Deuteronomistic prose sermon material shaped by exilic editors. On Jer 9:24-25 [Eng 9:25-26], Steiner (JBL 118 [1999]: 497-505) proposed the most economical account of מוּל בְּעׇרְלָה: a technical phrase for the incomplete Egyptian dorsal slit documented by Jonckheere, as against Israelite full amputation. The adjective, not this noun, carries Ezekiel's elaboration of the field: the "uncircumcised dead" of Ezek 28:10, 31:18, and 32:17-32, which Block, Greenberg, and Zimmerli read as an honor and shame classification rather than a description (Egyptians and Phoenicians did in fact circumcise), and the synthetic formula of Ezek 44:7, 9, which Mayer identifies as the terminus in which P's physical requirement and the Deuteronomic and Jeremianic ethical demand are fused into one criterion of exclusion.

Where scholars disagree about orlah

Which sense of the root ערל is basic: the anatomical foreskin, or the wider idea of a covering that seals something off.

  • majorityThe core sense is "closed, sealed, covering, obstructive," and the prepuce is a specialized application because it covers the glans; the uses for lips, ears, hearts, and unripe fruit follow directly from that core rather than being metaphors built on the anatomical term. The Akkadian cognate urullu, purely anatomical in a culture that did not circumcise, supports treating the ritual sense as a secondary West Semitic development.; HALOT, The Hebrew and Aramaic Lexicon of the Old Testament (Leiden: Brill, 1994-2000), 2:884-885; G. Mayer, "ערל / עׇרְלָה," TDOT XI (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2001), 349-352; Gesenius, Hebraisches und Aramaisches Handworterbuch, 18th ed., ed. H. Donner (Berlin: Springer, 2013); Eugene Carpenter and Michael A. Grisanti, "ערל," NIDOTTE 3:507-508 (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1997)
  • minorityThe root describes flesh that is loose or projecting, a physical description of the prepuce as pendant flesh; the anatomical sense is therefore primary and every figurative use is a later metaphor built on it.; BDB, A Hebrew and English Lexicon of the Old Testament (Oxford: Clarendon, 1906), 790-791
In-depth research

This is a research paper, so it may be hard to read without scholarly background. It is useful if you want to dig even deeper into this word.

Sources

  • HALOT, The Hebrew and Aramaic Lexicon of the Old Testament, tr. M. E. J. Richardson (Leiden: Brill, 1994-2000), 2:884-885lexicon
  • BDB, A Hebrew and English Lexicon of the Old Testament (Oxford: Clarendon, 1906), 790-791lexicon
  • G. Mayer, "ערל / עׇרְלָה," TDOT XI (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2001), 349-352dictionary
  • Eugene Carpenter and Michael A. Grisanti, "ערל," NIDOTTE 3:507-508 (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1997)dictionary
  • Jacob Milgrom, Leviticus 17-22 (AB 3A; New York: Doubleday, 2000), 1677-1684commentary
  • Baruch A. Levine, Leviticus (JPS Torah Commentary; Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society, 1989)commentary
  • Howard Eilberg-Schwartz, The Savage in Judaism (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1990), 141-176monograph
  • William H. C. Propp, "That Bloody Bridegroom (Exodus IV 24-6)," VT 43 (1993): 495-518article
  • William H. C. Propp, Exodus 1-18 (AB 2; New York: Doubleday, 1999), 233-241commentary
  • David A. Bernat, Sign of the Covenant: Circumcision in the Priestly Tradition (SBL AIL 3; Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 2009), 91-95monograph
  • Richard C. Steiner, "Incomplete Circumcision in Egypt and Edom: Jeremiah (9:24-25) in the Light of Josephus and Jonckheere," JBL 118 (1999): 497-505article
  • Werner E. Lemke, "Circumcision of the Heart: The Journey of a Biblical Metaphor," in A God So Near (Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns, 2003), 299-319article
  • John D. Meade, "Circumcision of the Heart in Leviticus and Deuteronomy," SBJT 18.3 (2014): 59-85article
  • Moshe Weinfeld, Deuteronomy 1-11 (AB 5; New York: Doubleday, 1991)commentary
  • Jeffrey H. Tigay, Deuteronomy (JPS Torah Commentary; Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society, 1996)commentary
  • Claus Westermann, Genesis 12-36, tr. J. J. Scullion (Minneapolis: Augsburg, 1985), 255-270commentary
  • Gordon J. Wenham, Genesis 16-50 (WBC 2; Dallas: Word, 1994), Excursus on Circumcisioncommentary
  • Michael V. Fox, "The Sign of the Covenant: Circumcision in the Light of the Priestly ʾot Etiologies," RB 81 (1974): 557-596article
  • A. Militarev and L. Kogan, Semitic Etymological Dictionary I: Anatomy of Man and Animals (AOAT 278/1; Munster: Ugarit-Verlag, 2000), no. 285dictionary
  • Meir Malul, Knowledge, Control and Sex: Studies in Biblical Thought, Culture and Worldview (Tel Aviv-Jaffa: Archaeological Center Publications, 2002)monograph

All attested forms of עׇרְלָה

f s construct

עָרְלָתוֹ

Gen 17:14, Gen 17:24, Gen 17:25, Lev 12:3, Lev 19:23

f p construct

עָרְלוֹת

1Sa 18:25, 2Sa 3:14, Jer 4:4

f s absolute

עָרְלָה

Gen 34:14, Jer 9:25

f s construct

עָרְלַת

Exo 4:25, Deu 10:16

f p absolute

עֲרָלוֹת

Jos 5:3

f p construct

עָרְלֹתֵיהֶם

1Sa 18:27

f s construct

עָרְלַתְכֶם

Gen 17:11

f s construct

עָרְלָתָם

Gen 17:23