The verb occurs about ten times, and virtually every modern lexicon that numbers homographs splits it the same way: I "pass on, advance" (with a causative "remove") and II "deck oneself, put on ornaments." BDB (725-726), Koehler-Baumgartner-Stamm (HALOT), DCH 6, Gesenius 18th ed. (Meyer/Donner/Ruterswoerden), and NIDOTTE (G/K 6335 and 6338) agree in both the split and the numbering. The one classical dissent is the older Gesenius (Thesaurus; Tregelles English edition), who read a single polysemous root in which the Qal "pass by" extended causatively to "make [a garment] pass over," hence "adorn," appealing to German ueberziehen / anziehen and to the parallelism with לבש at Job 40:10.
The comparative evidence is lopsided, and it drives the consensus. Sense I sits in a broad West Semitic family: Ugaritic ʿdy "pass, remove" (DUL; Gordon, UT 19.1826), Biblical Aramaic עדא/עדה with Haphel "remove" (Dan 2:21; 5:20; 7:26), Jewish Palestinian and Babylonian Aramaic ʿdy as a standard Targumic rendering of עבר (Sokoloff, DJPA/DJBA), Syriac ʿda with Aphel "remove," Arabic ʿadā "run, pass by, transgress," Geʿez ʿadawa "cross, transgress" (Leslau, CDG 59), and Phoenician/Punic and Sabaic ʿdw/ʿdy. Akkadian has no cognate (edû "know" and adû "oath" are unrelated), so Kogan's classification treats the root as West Semitic rather than Common Semitic. Sense II, by contrast, has no verbal cognate anywhere: Ugaritic offers the noun ʿdt "ornament, vestment" but no verb, and the Aramaic nouns עידות / עדיתא are marginal and probably show Hebrew influence. Since the Hebrew reflex of sense I appears only in Job 28:8 and Prov 25:20, both in Aramaic-influenced wisdom material, Waltke and Murphy among others suspect an Aramaism, and the Proverbs form directly parallels the Aramaic Haphel/Aphel.
The live question is therefore not the split but the origin of sense II. Its near-invariable figura etymologica (Ezek 16:11 ואעדך עדי; Jer 4:30 תעדי עדי־זהב; Ezek 23:40 ועדית עדי) plus objects that are specific items of jewelry (Isa 61:10; Hos 2:15 MT; Jer 31:4) makes a verb coined from the noun עדי attractive; Kellermann (TDOT 10, s.v. עדי) leans that way and HALOT cross-references accordingly, while Klein derives the noun from the verb. On method, Kogan's principle that homographic senses without a cross-linguistic semantic bridge should be kept apart tells against the Gesenius unification, and Barr's chapter on the distribution of homonyms (Comparative Philology, ch. 6) permits this particular split precisely because each sense has independent support, while warning against multiplying homonyms further. Textually, Job 28:8 is read as "pass over" without emendation by Pope (who cites Ugaritic ʿdy), Clines, Habel, and Seow, and 11QtgJob confirms it with an Aramaic equivalent; Prov 25:20 is retained by Waltke, Fox, and Murphy against an older proposal to emend to מערה; and Ezek 16:11 is read as causative in sense by Zimmerli and Greenberg, with Block preferring BDB's repointing to the causative form.