StrongerBible

segid

סְגִד

AramaicH5457worship, pay homage, ...

Appears 12 times · tap a cell to see the verses

Dan 2:46Dan 3:5Dan 3:6Dan 3:7Dan 3:10Dan 3:11Dan 3:12Dan 3:14Dan 3:15 (2×)Dan 3:18Dan 3:28
Word studyseh-GEEDverb

What segid means

to go down to the ground in front of someone as an act of reverence: to prostrate oneself before a god, an image, or a superior

TranslatabilityApproximateCertaintySettled

This word belongs almost entirely to one story. Eleven of its twelve appearances stand in Daniel 3, the account of the giant gold statue on the plain of Dura, and the twelfth is in the scene just before it. What the word names is a body doing something rather than a heart feeling something: going all the way down in front of someone and staying there.

Most often it arrives right after the verb for falling down, so the picture comes in two beats: drop to the ground, then lie there in reverence. The royal decree commands both beats together, the officials repeat both when they report the three Jewish men, and the men themselves deny both when they answer the king. That pairing is why the whole story can hinge on this word: a plain full of people can be watched doing it, and three men can be seen not doing it.

Daniel also keeps this word carefully apart from the verb for rendering religious service (פְּלַח). Four times the two stand side by side, and the men refuse both: they will not serve the king's gods, and they will not go down before his statue. Service is the standing allegiance; this word is the single visible act that would announce it.

Three different things receive the act:

  • the gold statue Nebuchadnezzar set up, which the whole empire is ordered to honor
  • any god at all, in the king's closing praise of the men who refused him
  • Daniel himself, when the king goes face down before the man who read his dream

Nuances

1ato go down to the ground before a god or an image of one, as an act of worship
Dan 3:5Dan 3:6Dan 3:7Dan 3:10Dan 3:11Dan 3:12Dan 3:14Dan 3:15 (2×)Dan 3:18Dan 3:28
1bto go down to the ground before a person, as an act of homage
TranslatabilityPartial
Dan 2:46
Dan 2:46

Whether Nebuchadnezzar's prostration before Daniel in Daniel 2:46, accompanied by a grain offering and incense, is extravagant court homage paid to a human dignitary or cultic honor directed at Daniel himself.

  • contestedCourt homage of a kind a Babylonian or Persian court could pay to a human superior; the offering language is narrative hyperbole serving the point that the king has recognized the God who gave Daniel the dream.; John Goldingay, Daniel (Word Biblical Commentary 30), on Daniel 2:46
  • contestedGenuine cultic honor rendered to Daniel, which the narrative reports without rebuke because in this scene the pagan king's act functions as an acknowledgement of Daniel's God.; John J. Collins, Daniel (Hermeneia), on Daniel 2:46; James A. Montgomery, A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Book of Daniel (International Critical Commentary), on Daniel 2:46

What scholars say about segid

The verb is a widespread Aramaic root for prostration, cognate with Hebrew סָגַד (Isaiah 44:15, 17, 19; 46:6) and attested in Imperial Aramaic, Syriac and later Jewish Aramaic. HALOT and BDB give it a single sense for Biblical Aramaic, to prostrate oneself or do homage, with the object marked by ל, and no lexicon posits homonymy. All twelve occurrences are confined to Daniel 2:46 and Daniel 3, and in six verses of Daniel 3 as well as in Daniel 2:46 it is coordinated with נְפַל in a near-hendiadys that the Old Greek and Theodotion render with προσκυνέω; Vogt's lexicon documents the same construction in Aramaic documents outside the Bible. The lexical range is therefore not in question. The exegetical discussion concentrates on Daniel 2:46, where Nebuchadnezzar's prostration before Daniel is accompanied by מִנְחָה and incense: Montgomery already registered the difficulty, and Collins and Goldingay lay out the competing readings, cultic honor rendered to Daniel himself versus extravagant royal homage, without a settled consensus. A related observation in the commentaries is the deliberate contrast Daniel 3 draws between this verb and פְּלַח, which the three men negate together in 3:12, 3:14, 3:18 and 3:28.

Sources

  • HALOT (Koehler and Baumgartner), Aramaic section, s.v. סגדlexicon
  • BDB, Biblical Aramaic appendix, s.v. סְגִדlexicon
  • Ernst Vogt, A Lexicon of Biblical Aramaic: Clarified by Ancient Documents (trans. J. A. Fitzmyer), s.v. סגדlexicon
  • John J. Collins, Daniel (Hermeneia)commentary
  • John Goldingay, Daniel (Word Biblical Commentary 30)commentary
  • James A. Montgomery, A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Book of Daniel (International Critical Commentary)commentary
  • Franz Rosenthal, A Grammar of Biblical Aramaicgrammar

All attested forms of סְגִד

peal conjunctive-imperfect 3ms

וְיִסְגֻּד

Dan 3:6, Dan 3:10, Dan 3:11

peal participle m p absolute

סָגְדִין

Dan 3:7, Dan 3:12, Dan 3:14

peal conjunctive-imperfect 2mp

וְתִסְגְּדוּן

Dan 3:5, Dan 3:15

peal imperfect 1cp

נִסְגֻּד

Dan 3:18

peal imperfect 2mp

תִסְגְּדוּן

Dan 3:15

peal imperfect 3mp

יִסְגְּדוּן

Dan 3:28

peal perfect 3ms

סְגִד

Dan 2:46