the totality of something: the whole of it, or each and every one of its members
This is the Aramaic word for totality, and it does exactly the same work in Daniel and Ezra that its close Hebrew twin does across the rest of the Old Testament. At its core it is a noun meaning "the whole, the entirety." From that one idea flow all of its everyday uses: whole, all, every, each, any, everything. Which English word fits best depends on what the word is attached to, not on any change in the word itself.
Applied to a single thing, it gathers that thing into a whole ("the whole earth," "complete peace"). Applied to a group you could count, it means "all of them" ("all the wise men of Babylon," "all peoples, nations, and languages"). Applied to one unnamed item, it fans out to "every" or "each" ("every kind of music"). Standing on its own it means "everything" ("all this came upon the king"). And inside a command, a threat, or a negative, it shifts toward "any," so that "any fault could not be found" comes out as "no fault at all was found."
That negative pattern is the one real trap. When a "not" is in the sentence, the word usually drives toward "none" rather than the loose English "any," and reading it the casual English way can weaken or reverse the point. Everywhere else a plain English word carries it cleanly, which is why translations of Daniel and Ezra rarely leave a reader misled here.