StrongerBible

ḥasaph

חָשַׂף

HebrewH2834strip, uncover, ...

Appears 11 times · tap a cell to see the verses

Psa 29:9Isa 20:4Isa 30:14Isa 47:2Isa 52:10Jer 13:26Jer 49:10Ezk 4:7Jol 1:7 (2×)Hag 2:16
Root family
Word studykhah-SAHFverb

What ḥasaph means

1

to strip something bare: to pull away what covers it so that it stands exposed

TranslatabilityApproximateCertaintySettled

The picture behind this word is always the same. Something that was covered has its covering taken off, and what was out of sight is suddenly in plain view. What changes from verse to verse is only what gets uncovered, and why.

  • A city pictured as a woman has her skirts pulled up over her face, so that her disgrace is on public display.
  • Captives are marched away with their clothing gone and their bodies uncovered.
  • Locusts leave a fig tree white and bare, with nothing at all on its branches.
  • A hunted nation is laid open so completely that its hiding places are gone and it has nowhere left to run. That last verse sets the word alongside another Hebrew word for uncovering (גָּלָה), which is the clearest sign of how close the two are.

The exposure is almost never gentle, and it is almost never chosen. Someone stronger does it to someone weaker, and the one exposed has no say in it. That is why the word turns up so often in speeches of judgment: to be stripped bare is to lose covering, dignity and defense all at once.

One use runs the other way. When God "bares his holy arm" in front of all the nations, he is pushing the sleeve back off his fighting arm, the way a worker or a soldier does before something that takes real strength. Here the uncovering is a promise rather than a punishment: the arm that has been out of sight is about to be seen at work. Ezekiel is told to prophesy against a model siege of Jerusalem standing in exactly that posture, with his own arm bared.

Nuances

1ato strip the clothing off a person so that their nakedness is exposed to public shame
Isa 20:4Isa 47:2Jer 13:26
1bto strip a tree or a stretch of woodland of its leaves and bark, leaving it bare
Psa 29:9Jol 1:7 (2×)
1cto lay open what someone has hidden, so that there is nowhere left to hide
Jer 49:10
1dto bare the arm: to push the sleeve back as a sign of being ready to act with force
Isa 52:10Ezk 4:7
2

to draw off liquid: to scoop water or wine out of the vessel that holds it

TranslatabilityDirectCertaintyStrong

Twice the word describes taking liquid out of the place it sits. Isaiah pictures a clay jar smashed so thoroughly that not one piece is left big enough to scoop water from a cistern. Haggai describes a man coming to the winepress to draw off fifty measures and finding only twenty there.

The thread back to the word's usual sense is the act of removal: the liquid is lifted off and out of its container, much as a covering is pulled off a body. Hebrew dictionaries keep both uses under one word for that reason. English cannot follow them, though, because no single English verb covers both stripping a tree and scooping water, which is why the two are laid out here separately.

Isa 30:14Hag 2:16

What scholars say about ḥasaph

BDB, HALOT and DCH all treat חשׂף as a single verb with two ranges: the primary "strip off, strip, make bare" and a secondary "draw (water, wine)" attested only at Isaiah 30:14 and Haggai 2:16. The bridge usually proposed between them is the notion of removal or skimming off, though the lexica do not press the etymology and no separate root is generally posited. The qal accounts for all the finite forms; Ezekiel 4:7 supplies a passive participle used adjectivally of the prophet's arm, and Isaiah 20:4 the construct plural חֲשׂוּפַי with שֵׁת, describing Egyptian and Cushite captives led away with buttocks uncovered (Wildberger). Joel 1:7 reinforces the finite verb with the infinitive absolute, giving the locust devastation of the fig tree its emphatic force (Wolff). Isaiah 52:10 is the theologically weighted occurrence: the baring of the arm is a gesture of readied force rather than of nakedness, and the Greek Old Testament renders it with ἀποκαλύπτω, the verb it also uses for uncovering more generally (Blenkinsopp). Jeremiah 49:10 sets the verb in direct parallel with גִּלֵּיתִי, which is the clearest textual indication of its semantic overlap with גלה; Holladay reads the pair as a single image of Edom left without cover. Psalm 29:9 is disputed at the level of its objects rather than its verb: Craigie surveys the proposal, argued on the strength of Ugaritic parallels, to repoint אַיָּלוֹת as "terebinths" so that both cola describe trees, and notes that the stripping of the forests is secure on either reading. At Haggai 2:16 Meyers and Meyers take לַחְשֹׂף as drawing off from the vat, with the shortfall of the yield as the point of the oracle.

Sources

  • BDB, s.v. חָשַׂףlexicon
  • HALOT, s.v. חשׂףlexicon
  • DCH, s.v. חשׂףlexicon
  • Peter C. Craigie, Psalms 1-50, Word Biblical Commentary 19 (Waco: Word Books, 1983)commentary
  • Joseph Blenkinsopp, Isaiah 40-55, Anchor Bible 19A (New York: Doubleday, 2002)commentary
  • Hans Wildberger, Isaiah 13-27, Continental Commentaries (Minneapolis: Fortress, 1997)commentary
  • Hans Walter Wolff, Joel and Amos, Hermeneia (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1977)commentary
  • William L. Holladay, Jeremiah 1, Hermeneia (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1986)commentary
  • Carol L. Meyers and Eric M. Meyers, Haggai, Zechariah 1-8, Anchor Bible 25B (Garden City: Doubleday, 1987)commentary

All attested forms of חָשַׂף

qal infinitive-construct construct

חְשֹׂף

Isa 30:14, Hag 2:16

qal perfect 1cs

חָשַׂפְתִּי

Jer 13:26, Jer 49:10

qal perfect 3ms

חֲשָׂפָ, חָשַׂף

Jol 1:7, Isa 52:10

c s construct

חֲשׂוּפַי

Isa 20:4

qal consecutive-imperfect 3ms

וַיֶּחֱשֹׂף

Psa 29:9

qal imperative 2fs

חֶשְׂפִּי

Isa 47:2

qal infinitive-absolute absolute

חָשֹׂף

Jol 1:7

qal passive-participle f s absolute

חֲשׂוּפָה

Ezk 4:7