StrongerBible

ḥashekhah

חֲשֵׁכָה

HebrewH2825darkness, gloom

Appears 5 times · tap a cell to see the verses

Gen 15:12Psa 82:5Psa 139:12Isa 8:22Isa 50:10
Root family
Word studyResearch-gradekhah-shay-KHAHnoun

What ḥashekhah means

darkness felt as dread or gloom: the heavy, oppressive dark of terror, judgment, or divine hiddenness rather than plain nightfall

TranslatabilityPartialCertaintyStrong

This is a poet's word for darkness. It names the same thing as the ordinary word for dark (חשׁך), but it is reserved for moments when darkness is overwhelming: the dread that falls in a vision of God, the gloom of judgment, the blindness of those who have lost their way. It never turns up in plain narration or law. Where the common word simply reports that it is dark, this word colors the dark with fear.

Because it is so rare (only five places in the Hebrew Bible) and always poetic, it works less like a label for a thing and more like a mood. Genesis pairs it with sheer terror; Isaiah stacks it with words for anguish; the Psalms use it for people stumbling through moral fog. In each case the writer could have used the plain word and chose this one instead, to make the darkness press in on the reader.

Its most striking appearance turns the whole idea inside out. In Psalm 139 the poet says that even this kind of darkness is not dark to God: to him gloom and daylight are the same. The dread-word is chosen precisely so that its defeat carries weight. What terrifies people is no barrier at all to the One who made both light and dark.

Nuances

1adread-darkness: the terror that descends in an encounter with God
Gen 15:12
1bthe gloom of judgment and distress, piled up with words for anguish
Isa 8:22
1cthe darkness people walk in: moral blindness, or the hard road of the faithful who cannot yet see
Psa 82:5Isa 50:10
1ddarkness that is no obstacle to God, who sees through it as easily as through daylight
Psa 139:12

What scholars say about ḥashekhah

The major lexica (BDB 365, HALOT 1:362, DCH 3:322) decline to give חֲשֵׁכָה a separate gloss, treating it as a poetic feminine by-form of חֹשֶׁךְ with the same referent. A minority tradition running from Aalen's 1951 monograph on light and darkness in the Old Testament through Ringgren (TDOT 5:245-259) argues for affective intensification: the marked feminine clusters in contexts of theophanic dread, judgment, and eschatological terror. The defensible synthesis, supported by TLOT (Ringgren) and Huehnergard's morphological study of the deverbal state-noun pattern (Sha'arei Lashon, 2007), is distributional: the word denotes the same referent as the masculine but is pragmatically restricted to elevated registers and foregrounds darkness as an experienced condition. Four of five secure attestations collocate with terror or judgment vocabulary (אֵימָה in Gen 15:12; צָרָה and צוּקָה in Isa 8:22); the exception, Ps 139:12, is a high-poetic meditation pairing the feminine with the equally rare feminine אוֹרָה. The root חשׁך is a Northwest Semitic (Canaanite-Aramaic) isogloss with no clear East Semitic cognate (Ringgren). Isa 50:10 uses the anomalous masculine plural חֲשֵׁכִים, which BDB and HALOT gather under the same lemma; Mic 3:6 is disputed between a verbal and a nominal pointing (Hillers, Micah, Hermeneia, repoints to the noun; Andersen-Freedman, AB, keep the verb) and is not among this corpus's tagged occurrences.

Where scholars disagree about ḥashekhah

Whether חֲשֵׁכָה is a distinct lexeme, a mere stylistic by-form of חֹשֶׁךְ, or the same word marked for poetic register and heightened dread.

  • majorityIt is the same lexeme as חֹשֶׁךְ with no distinct denotation, a poetic feminine by-form chosen for euphony or parallelism (BDB notes only that it is chiefly poetic). The clinching evidence is Ps 139:12, where both forms stand in adjacent lines.; BDB, s.v. חֲשֵׁכָה, 365; HALOT, s.v. חֲשֵׁכָה, 1:362
  • minorityIt is affectively intensified: the marked feminine (with אֲפֵלָה and מַחְשָׁךְ) clusters in judgment, theophany, and eschatological terror, carrying a heightened sense of dread the neutral masculine lacks.; Sverre Aalen, Die Begriffe 'Licht' und 'Finsternis' im Alten Testament (Oslo, 1951); H. Ringgren, in TDOT, 5:245-259
  • contestedLexically it denotes the same referent, but pragmatically it is restricted to elevated registers and its morphology foregrounds darkness as an experienced condition rather than a substance; its selection over the masculine is rarely accidental.; E. Jenni and C. Westermann, eds., Theological Lexicon of the Old Testament (Hendrickson, 1997), 1:471-73; John Huehnergard, 'qātīl and qətīl Nouns in Biblical Hebrew,' in Sha'arei Lashon (Jerusalem, 2007)
In-depth research

This is a research paper, so it may be hard to read without scholarly background. It is useful if you want to dig even deeper into this word.

Sources

  • BDB, s.v. חֲשֵׁכָה, 365lexicon
  • HALOT, s.v. חֲשֵׁכָה, 1:362lexicon
  • David J. A. Clines, ed., The Dictionary of Classical Hebrew, vol. 3 (Sheffield, 1996), 322-23lexicon
  • H. Ringgren, 'חָשַׁךְ ḥāšakh; חֹשֶׁךְ ḥōshekh,' in TDOT, 5:245-259theological-dictionary
  • Sverre Aalen, Die Begriffe 'Licht' und 'Finsternis' im Alten Testament, im Spätjudentum und im Rabbinismus (Oslo: Jacob Dybwad, 1951)monograph
  • John Huehnergard, 'qātīl and qətīl Nouns in Biblical Hebrew,' in Sha'arei Lashon, vol. 1 (Jerusalem: Bialik, 2007)article
  • E. Jenni and C. Westermann, eds., Theological Lexicon of the Old Testament, trans. M. E. Biddle (Hendrickson, 1997), 1:471-73theological-dictionary
  • Nahum M. Sarna, Genesis, JPS Torah Commentary (Philadelphia: JPS, 1989), 114-15commentary
  • Claus Westermann, Genesis 12-36: A Continental Commentary, trans. J. J. Scullion (Fortress, 1985), 222-25commentary
  • John Goldingay and David Payne, Isaiah 40-55, ICC (T&T Clark, 2006), 2:219-22commentary
  • Frank-Lothar Hossfeld and Erich Zenger, Psalms 3, Hermeneia (Fortress, 2011), 535-43commentary

All attested forms of חֲשֵׁכָה

f s absolute

חֲשֵׁכָה, חֲשֵׁיכָה

Gen 15:12, Psa 82:5, Isa 8:22, Psa 139:12

m p absolute

חֲשֵׁכִים

Isa 50:10