StrongerBible

daveh

דָּוֶה

HebrewH1739faint, menstruating, ...

Appears 5 times · tap a cell to see the verses

Lev 15:33Lev 20:18Isa 30:22Lam 1:13Lam 5:17
Root family
Word studyResearch-gradedah-VEHadjective

What daveh means

ailing: drained of strength, whether a body that is unwell, a woman in her monthly bleeding, or a heart giving out under grief

TranslatabilityPartialCertaintyStrong

This word describes a body with its strength drained away. It can be a person who is simply unwell, a city worn down until nothing is left of it, or a heart that is giving out under grief. Hebrew does not file these in separate compartments the way English does. To be described this way is to be diminished, and whether the cause is illness, bleeding, or sorrow is a matter of context rather than of a different word.

Israel's priests used it as their plain term for a woman during her monthly bleeding. In Leviticus it stands next to another word, the one for the ritual separation such a woman entered (נִדָּה), and the two do different jobs: that word names her standing in the community's ritual life, while this one names her bodily condition. The pairing is a good clue to how the priests thought about it, as something a body goes through rather than a fault in the woman.

Isaiah takes the same word and turns it into the sharpest insult he can find. Judah's silver-plated idols, once its most precious possessions, will be thrown out "like a cloth of a woman's bleeding", with a curt "Get out!" The shock works only because everyone knew the Leviticus background: the prophet moves the objects of highest devotion into the category of the most defiling thing a household could hold.

In Lamentations the word turns inward. Zion is left "desolate, ailing all the day long", and by the last chapter the whole community says the same of its own heart. The English "faint" is too weak here. In Hebrew thought the heart is where a person's vitality sits, so a heart described this way is not discouraged, it is failing. A closely related adjective used elsewhere of a heart in exactly that state (דַּוָּי) belongs to the same word family.

Nuances

1aunwell in the way a woman is during her monthly bleeding, which is how Israel's priests named that condition
TranslatabilityApproximate
Lev 15:33Lev 20:18
Lev 15:33

Whether the word in this summarizing phrase names the woman's weakened bodily condition or the menstrual flow itself.

  • majorityThe term designates the woman's reduced vitality, her state of being unwell, and the menstrual use is a specialized application of a general word for infirmity.; BDB, 188-89, s.v. דָּוֶה, דָּוָה; Baruch A. Levine, The JPS Torah Commentary: Leviticus (Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society, 1989), 96-99; Robert Alter, The Five Books of Moses: A Translation with Commentary (New York: Norton, 2004), on Leviticus 15:33
  • minorityThe term refers to the discharge itself, the flow of blood rather than the woman's condition.; David E. S. Stein, translator's notes to the revised JPS translation, on Leviticus 15:33 (documenting the reading of Saadiah Gaon and Rashi's second alternative)
1bused of a thing rather than a person: a bloodied cloth to be thrown out, standing for what is too defiling to keep
Isa 30:22
1cworn down and languishing, with no strength left day after day
Lam 1:13
1dsaid of the heart: not merely low, but actually failing under grief
Lam 5:17

What scholars say about daveh

BDB (188-89) divides the adjective cleanly into (1) "faint" (Lam 1:13; 5:17) and (2) "unwell, menstruous" (Lev 15:33; 20:18; Isa 30:22), while HALOT files the whole group under a single root דוה I with the double sense "ill / menstruating", anchored by Ugaritic dw (Kirta, KTU 1.16) and Syriac dwy "be sick, be wretched"; the 18th German edition of Gesenius glosses the verb "krank sein, unpäßlich sein (menstruierend)" and the adjectives "krank, schwach, matt", and gives Isa 30:22 as a menstruous garment. TWOT 411 (R. B. Allen), DCH 2, and the TDOT article on דָּוָה (most probably Klaus Seybold) agree on one root with a specialized Priestly application, TDOT stressing the prophetic linkage of national defeat to bodily illness. The comparative evidence is West Semitic (Ugaritic dw, Syriac and Aramaic dwy, Arabic dawiya with dāʾ "disease", Geʿez däwäyä, Mandaic dwa), reconstructed as *dwy "be weak, sick, sorrowful"; the Akkadian material (dawûm "talk deliriously", CAD D:168) is marginal, since the standard Akkadian term is marāṣu, and no Egyptian cognate is credible. The restriction of the root to female physiology is distinctively Hebrew, which favors reading the Priestly usage as the application of a general term for infirmity. On Leviticus, Milgrom (AB 3, 948-53; AB 3A, 1754-55) renders הַדָּוָה בְּנִדָּתָהּ "the menstruant" and argues that Priestly law is markedly restrained beside surrounding ancient Near Eastern practice and Qumran, while Levine (JPS Leviticus, 96-99) and Alter prefer "unwellness, reduced vitality"; Klawans (Impurity and Sin, 21-42, 105-6) places menstruation firmly within ritual rather than moral impurity, the moral prohibition of Lev 18:19 and 20:18 attaching to the act rather than to the woman or to this term; Wenham (NICOT, 222-25) reads it through Douglas's life-and-death axis as an "aura of death", Gerstenberger (OTL, 181-91), Ellens, Philip, and Erbele-Küster take the word as descriptive rather than pejorative, and Fonrobert traces the later rabbinic displacement of דָּוָה by נִדָּה. On Isa 30:22 the critical commentators are essentially unanimous that the term is concrete and deliberately offensive (Wildberger's Menstruationstuch, Oswalt's "menstruous rag", with Blenkinsopp, Childs, Beuken, and Roberts all presupposing the Priestly background); none softens it to a generic unclean thing. On Lamentations, Berlin, Hillers, Dobbs-Allsopp, Provan, and Salters insist the term keeps clinical weight, since לֵב is the seat of vital force, and note that Lam 1:8-17 knits this root together with נִדָּה and טֻמְאָה, so that the city told to discard its idols as a defiled thing has itself become one.

In-depth research

This is a research paper, so it may be hard to read without scholarly background. It is useful if you want to dig even deeper into this word.

Sources

  • BDB, 188-89, s.v. דָּוָה, דָּוֶה, דַּוָּי, דְּוַי, מַדְוֶהlexicon
  • HALOT, vol. 1, s.v. דוה Ilexicon
  • DCH, vol. 2, s.v. דוה, דָּוֶהlexicon
  • Wilhelm Gesenius, Hebräisches und aramäisches Handwörterbuch über das Alte Testament, 18th ed., ed. Herbert Donner et al. (Berlin: Springer, 2013), s.v. דוהlexicon
  • R. B. Allen, "דוה," in Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament, ed. R. Laird Harris, Gleason L. Archer, and Bruce K. Waltke (Chicago: Moody, 1980), no. 411dictionary
  • Theological Dictionary of the Old Testament, vol. 3 (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1978), s.v. דָּוָהdictionary
  • Jacob Milgrom, Leviticus 1-16, Anchor Bible 3 (New York: Doubleday, 1991), 948-53commentary
  • Jacob Milgrom, Leviticus 17-22, Anchor Bible 3A (New York: Doubleday, 2000), 1754-55commentary
  • Baruch A. Levine, The JPS Torah Commentary: Leviticus (Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society, 1989), 96-99, 138-39commentary
  • Jonathan Klawans, Impurity and Sin in Ancient Judaism (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000), 21-42, 105-6monograph
  • Gordon J. Wenham, The Book of Leviticus, NICOT (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1979), 222-25commentary
  • Erhard S. Gerstenberger, Leviticus: A Commentary, OTL (Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 1996), 181-91commentary
  • Deborah L. Ellens, Women in the Sex Texts of Leviticus and Deuteronomy, LHBOTS 458 (London: T&T Clark, 2008)monograph
  • Dorothea Erbele-Küster, Body, Language, and Gender in Leviticus 12 and 15, LHBOTS 539 (London: T&T Clark, 2013)monograph
  • Tarja S. Philip, Menstruation and Childbirth in the Bible: Fertility and Impurity, Studies in Biblical Literature 88 (New York: Peter Lang, 2006), 45-51monograph
  • Charlotte Elisheva Fonrobert, Menstrual Purity: Rabbinic and Christian Reconstructions of Biblical Gender (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2000)monograph
  • Hans Wildberger, Isaiah 28-39: A Continental Commentary, trans. Thomas H. Trapp (Minneapolis: Fortress, 2002), on Isaiah 30:22commentary
  • John N. Oswalt, The Book of Isaiah, Chapters 1-39, NICOT (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1986), 561-62commentary
  • Joseph Blenkinsopp, Isaiah 1-39, Anchor Bible 19 (New York: Doubleday, 2000), 419-20commentary
  • J. J. M. Roberts, First Isaiah, Hermeneia (Minneapolis: Fortress, 2015), 396-98commentary
  • Adele Berlin, Lamentations: A Commentary, OTL (Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2002), 46 and on 1:13, 1:22, 5:17commentary
  • F. W. Dobbs-Allsopp, Lamentations, Interpretation (Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2002), on 1:8-17 and 5:17-22commentary
  • Delbert R. Hillers, Lamentations, rev. ed., Anchor Bible 7A (New York: Doubleday, 1992)commentary
  • Robin B. Salters, Lamentations: A Critical and Exegetical Commentary, ICC (London: T&T Clark, 2010), on 1:13 and 5:17commentary
  • Iain W. Provan, Lamentations, NCBC (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1991), 51-52, 132commentary

All attested forms of דָּוֶה

f s absolute

דָּוָה

Lev 15:33, Lev 20:18, Isa 30:22, Lam 1:13

m s absolute

דָוֶה

Lam 5:17