The standard lexica file the noun under דבר I and give a range of "cause, reason, matter, manner" (BDB 184; HALOT I:212; Gesenius 18th ed.), with DCH adding "suit" for Job 5:8 and "account" for the Qohelet idioms. TDOT, TLOT and NIDOTTE all treat it as a subordinate item under דָּבָר, a feminine abstract of the qitl-at pattern formed in parallel to the qatal-pattern noun rather than as its gendered counterpart; the absolute is unattested, so the analysis rests on the construct דִּבְרַת and the suffixed דִּבְרָתִי. A minority line of comparative philology (Kopf, VT 8 [1958]: 161-215; Barr, Comparative Philology and the Text of the Old Testament, 328-331; Klein; Tawil) derives the "manner, on account of" branch instead from a homophonous root cognate with Arabic dabara "to turn the back, follow after" and dabbara "to arrange, deliberate", which accounts for the attested senses more economically than "speech" does; Syriac dabra "leading, guidance" and Akkadian dabaru "to push back, drive off" alongside dababu "to speak, plead a case" show the same double root across Semitic. Functionally the occurrences split in two. Job 5:8 alone is a full nominal use, read as a juridical plea by Clines (WBC 17:141), Pope (AB 15:43), Habel (OTL) and Hartley (NICOT), where the LXX simply paraphrases with epikalesomai. The three Qohelet passages, together with the two Biblical Aramaic occurrences in Daniel 2:30 and 4:14 [ET 4:17], show the noun grammaticalized into the compound preposition and purpose conjunction al-dibrat (di / she-), which Rosenthal treats as a productive Aramaic subordinator of the preposition plus construct plus di type, and which Schoors and Hurvitz treat as a diagnostic Aramaism in the dating of Qohelet (Fredericks dissents, arguing for a northern dialect). Psalm 110:4 stands between the two profiles: BDB, HALOT and Allen (WBC 21:81) analyze the final yod as hireq compaginis, giving "after the manner of Melchizedek", while the LXX rendering kata ten taxin, quoted six times in Hebrews, gave the phrase an institutional coloring the Hebrew probably did not carry, a polysemy Hay argues the author of Hebrews exploits deliberately (note the shift to kata ten homoioteta in Heb 7:15).