StrongerBible

dibbah

דִּבָּה

HebrewH1681slander, bad report, ...

Appears 9 times · tap a cell to see the verses

Gen 37:2Num 13:32Num 14:36Num 14:37Psa 31:13(14)Pro 10:18Pro 25:10Jer 20:10Ezk 36:3
Root family
Word studydib-BAHnoun

What dibbah means

a damaging report spread about someone or something, told in a way meant to turn others against them.

TranslatabilityPartialCertaintyStrong

This word never carries good news. Whenever it appears, someone's name is being damaged by what is being said, and the damage is the point. English has no single word for it because it holds three things together at once: the act of putting a report about, the talk itself, and the ruined name left behind.

The Bible uses it in three recognizable situations.

  • Someone deliberately puts a report into circulation, as the scouts do when they talk Israel out of entering the land.
  • Someone finds himself ringed by talk he cannot stop, which is how both the psalmist and Jeremiah describe their enemies.
  • Someone is left with a name he cannot clear, the warning behind the proverb about giving away a friend's secret.

The hardest question the word raises is whether the report has to be false. In the wilderness story the answer is plain enough: God treats the scouts' account of the land as a lie and punishes the men who spread it. But this is not the ordinary word for a lie (שֶׁקֶר), and it is not the neutral word for news or a report either (שְׁמוּעָה). What it always insists on is that the talk is hostile and that it costs its target something. Genesis 37:2, where Joseph brings a report about his brothers to their father, is the test case, and the Hebrew leaves the question open.

It is a word for whispering campaigns rather than open accusation. Twice, in Psalm 31:13 and Jeremiah 20:10, the same phrase describes the murmur of many voices at once, and both times it comes attached to the cry "terror on every side."

Nuances

1aa damaging report that someone deliberately puts into circulation to turn others against its target.
Num 13:32Num 14:36Num 14:37Pro 10:18
1bthe hostile talk going around about someone, and the bad name it fastens on them.
Psa 31:13(14)Pro 25:10Jer 20:10Ezk 36:3
1ca damaging report about someone's conduct carried privately to a person in authority over them.
CertaintyContested
Gen 37:2

What scholars say about dibbah

The standard critical lexicons converge on the core sense. BDB glosses the noun "whispering, defamation, evil report"; HALOT and DCH give "slander, evil report, defamatory rumour." All three connect it with the root דבב, used of speech that moves quietly, which suits the whispering character of the attested uses. The noun is regularly the object of the causative of יצא, "to bring out" or "put into circulation" (Numbers 13:32; 14:36, 37; Proverbs 10:18), an idiom for launching a report rather than merely uttering one, while Genesis 37:2 uses הביא, "to bring" a report to a single hearer. The disputed question in the literature is whether falsity belongs to the word's semantics or only to the contexts in which it is most often used. Numbers 14:36-37 supplies the strongest case for falsity, since the narrative pronounces the scouts' account of the land evil and fatal; Genesis 37:2 supplies the strongest case against, since nothing in the passage impeaches the accuracy of what Joseph reported. Commentators on Genesis divide accordingly, some treating the consistently pejorative use elsewhere as a narratorial judgment on Joseph, others holding that the term marks the report as unfavorable without asserting that it was untrue. A further point of interest is the verbal correspondence between Psalm 31:13 and Jeremiah 20:10, which share both דִּבַּת רַבִּים and מָגוֹר מִסָּבִיב, the latter being a signature phrase of Jeremiah; the direction of dependence is discussed in the commentaries on both books.

Where scholars disagree about dibbah

Whether the word always means the report is false, or can name a report that is damaging but true. The question comes to a head at Genesis 37:2, where Joseph brings a report about his brothers to their father and nothing in the passage says the report was untrue.

  • majorityThe word marks talk as hostile and reputation-damaging without settling whether it is accurate. Falsity belongs to particular contexts, most obviously the scouts' account of the land, and not to the word itself.; BDB (Brown-Driver-Briggs), s.v. דִּבָּה; HALOT (Koehler-Baumgartner), s.v. דבה; DCH (Clines, ed.), s.v. דבה
  • minorityFalsity is bound up with the word. Everywhere else it names talk the text condemns, so Genesis 37:2 is best read as the narrator's verdict that Joseph's report was not to be trusted.; Gordon J. Wenham, Genesis 16-50, Word Biblical Commentary (1994); Claus Westermann, Genesis 37-50: A Commentary (1986)

Sources

  • BDB (Brown-Driver-Briggs), s.v. דִּבָּהlexicon
  • HALOT (Koehler-Baumgartner), s.v. דבהlexicon
  • DCH (Clines, ed.), s.v. דבהlexicon
  • Gordon J. Wenham, Genesis 16-50, Word Biblical Commentary (1994)commentary
  • Claus Westermann, Genesis 37-50: A Commentary (1986)commentary
  • Nahum M. Sarna, Genesis, JPS Torah Commentary (1989)commentary
  • Timothy R. Ashley, The Book of Numbers, NICOT (1993)commentary
  • Baruch A. Levine, Numbers 1-20, Anchor Bible (1993)commentary
  • William L. Holladay, Jeremiah 1, Hermeneia (1986)commentary

All attested forms of דִּבָּה

f s construct

דִּבַּת

Num 13:32, Num 14:37, Psa 31:13, Jer 20:10, Ezk 36:3

f s absolute

דִבָּה

Num 14:36, Pro 10:18

f s construct

דִבָּתְךָ

Pro 25:10

f s construct

דִּבָּתָם

Gen 37:2