StrongerBible

gopher

גֹּפֶר

HebrewH1613cypress, gopher wood

Appears 1 time · tap a cell to see the verses

Gen 6:14
Root family
Word studyResearch-gradeGO-fernoun

What gopher means

a kind of timber, no longer identifiable, that Noah is told to build the ark from; most likely cypress or some other resin-yielding evergreen

TranslatabilityUntranslatableCertaintyObscure

This word appears exactly once in the whole Hebrew Bible, in the boat-building instructions given to Noah: make an ark of "wood of gopher." Nothing else in Scripture uses it, and no ancient writer explains it. Its meaning was already out of reach by the time the Hebrew Bible was first translated into Greek, roughly two centuries before Christ, so every rendering since has been a reconstruction rather than a report.

The ancient translators disagreed so widely that their disagreement is itself the evidence:

  • The Greek translators wrote "squared timbers," describing how the wood was worked rather than naming any tree.
  • Jerome's Latin version followed the same instinct and wrote "smoothed woods."
  • The Aramaic versions, and the Talmud after them, all settled on cedar (אֶרֶז), the most prestigious building timber of the age.
  • The Syriac version chose boxwood, and one early Greek reviser chose "sulfured wood," hearing an echo of the Hebrew word for brimstone.

Modern scholars work from two clues. The stronger one is sound: the consonants of this word match those of the Greek and Latin words for cypress, and all three may descend from one older Mediterranean name for the tree, borrowed around the coasts. That would neatly explain a long-standing oddity, namely that the ordinary Hebrew word for cypress (בְּרוֹשׁ) is not the word used here. The second clue is the verse itself, which rings four times on one cluster of sounds: the ark is made of gopher, and it is coated inside and out with pitch (כֹּפֶר). Older reference works took that as a family resemblance and read the word as "pitch-bearing wood," which fits every tree the ancients guessed at, since all of them yield resin.

What can be said with confidence is narrow. It is a timber. It is durable and water-resistant enough for a large boat. And its name belonged to a specialized shipwright's vocabulary, shared with Israel's neighbors, that faded out of use not long after the story was written down.

Gen 6:14

Disputed

Which timber the word names.

  • majorityThe reference is simply unknown: an unidentified species of tree used for building the ark, with the ancient versions offering guesses rather than knowledge.; HALOT (Koehler-Baumgartner), s.v. גפר; BDB (Brown-Driver-Briggs), s.v. גפר; DCH (Clines, ed.), s.v. גפר; NIDOTTE, s.v. גפר; Gordon J. Wenham, Genesis 1-15 (Word Biblical Commentary); Victor P. Hamilton, The Book of Genesis: Chapters 1-17 (NICOT)
  • minorityThe word denotes cypress, a borrowed Mediterranean tree-name sharing an origin with Greek kyparissos and Latin cupressus; this explains the absence of the ordinary Hebrew term ברוש and fits attested shipbuilding practice.; Nahum M. Sarna, Genesis (JPS Torah Commentary); Benjamin J. Noonan, Non-Semitic Loanwords in the Hebrew Bible (Eisenbrauns/Penn State University Press, 2019); Robert S. P. Beekes, Etymological Dictionary of Greek (Brill, 2010), s.v. kyparissos; Robert Alter, The Five Books of Moses: A Translation with Commentary
  • minorityThe word is etymologically kin to כפר ("pitch") and means resinous or pitch-bearing wood generally, without naming a species.; BDB (Brown-Driver-Briggs), s.v. גפר; Bruce K. Waltke, Genesis: A Commentary (Zondervan); Claus Westermann, Genesis 1-11 (Continental Commentary)

What scholars say about gopher

The critical lexicons are unanimously cautious: BDB marks the word "dubious" and reports only the older guess that it is kin to כֹּפֶר ("pitch"), hence "pitch-wood, resinous wood"; HALOT gives "unknown species of tree used for building the ark"; DCH ventures no more than "perhaps cypress"; NIDOTTE reads "unknown wood"; TWOT treats the identification as speculative; there is no TDOT article. Klein's etymological dictionary calls the origin unknown and floats Akkadian gipāru. The Genesis commentaries mirror that caution while leaning toward a conifer: Wenham calls the tree's identity uncertain, Hamilton "an unknown type of material" but "undoubtedly some sort of coniferous tree," Speiser "a type of cedar or pine," Cassuto pine, Westermann a resinous conifer following Gunkel and von Rad, Waltke "resinous lumber suitable for making boats," while Sarna, Alter and Walton print cypress and label it conjecture. The ancient versions disagree completely (LXX ξύλα τετράγωνα "squared timbers"; Vulgate ligna levigata "smoothed woods"; Aquila τεθειωμένα "sulfurated," apparently by association with גָּפְרִית; Targums Onkelos, Pseudo-Jonathan and Neofiti plus b. Sanhedrin 108b "cedar"; Peshitta "boxwood"), which BHQ takes as showing an unknown word rather than textual divergence; the Samaritan Pentateuch agrees with the Masoretic consonants and no Qumran fragment preserves Genesis 6:14. Three Akkadian cognates have been proposed: gušūru "beam, log" (Cheyne, ZAW 1898), phonologically strained; gipāru, a woven reed structure (Hommel), semantically strained though suggestive alongside Finkel's reading of the Ark Tablet's bitumen-sealed coracle; and kupru "bitumen," which is certainly the source of כֹּפֶר in the same verse and generates the fourfold g/k-p-r sound-play (עֲצֵי־גֹפֶר, וְכָפַרְתָּ, בַּכֹּפֶר). The strongest current proposal is philological rather than Semitic: following Bochart, Noonan argues that גֹּפֶר and Greek κυπάρισσος descend from a common Pre-Greek Mediterranean loanword (Beekes classifies the -ισσος suffix as Pre-Greek substrate), which also explains why the native term בְּרוֹשׁ is absent. Methodologically the case illustrates the hazards Greenspahn and Cohen catalogue for hapax legomena: circular appeal to versions that were themselves guessing, cognate-hunting without regular sound correspondence, and contextual constraints too loose to narrow the field.

Where scholars disagree about gopher

Whether the Masoretic consonants גפר should be emended to כפר, making the phrase read "wood of pitch."

  • majorityThe transmitted consonants are original. גֹּפֶר is a genuine but obscure word, and the wide disagreement of the ancient versions reflects their ignorance of a real term rather than a corruption; neither BHS nor BHQ emends, no manuscript or version supports the change, and since Barr the field has been skeptical of consonantal emendation unsupported by witnesses.; Biblia Hebraica Quinta, Genesis, textual apparatus and commentary; Gordon J. Wenham, Genesis 1-15 (Word Biblical Commentary, 1987); James Barr, Comparative Philology and the Text of the Old Testament (1968)
  • minorityגֹּפֶר is a scribal miscopy of כֹּפֶר (gimel and kaph being graphically similar), so Genesis 6:14 originally read עֲצֵי־כֹפֶר, "wood of pitch," matching the Akkadian phrase iṣ kupri and the bitumen-centered Mesopotamian flood tradition.; BDB (Brown-Driver-Briggs), s.v. גפר, reporting the proposals of Gesenius, Dillmann and de Lagarde; Alan P. Dickin, Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith (2022)
In-depth research

This is a research paper, so it may be hard to read without scholarly background. It is useful if you want to dig even deeper into this word.

Sources

  • HALOT (Koehler-Baumgartner), s.v. גפרlexicon
  • BDB (Brown-Driver-Briggs), s.v. גפרlexicon
  • DCH (Clines, ed.), s.v. גפרlexicon
  • NIDOTTE (VanGemeren, ed.), s.v. גפרdictionary
  • TWOT (Harris, Archer, Waltke, eds.), s.v. גפרdictionary
  • Ernest Klein, A Comprehensive Etymological Dictionary of the Hebrew Language, s.v. גפרlexicon
  • Gordon J. Wenham, Genesis 1-15 (Word Biblical Commentary, 1987)commentary
  • Victor P. Hamilton, The Book of Genesis: Chapters 1-17 (NICOT, 1990)commentary
  • Nahum M. Sarna, Genesis (JPS Torah Commentary, 1989)commentary
  • E. A. Speiser, Genesis (Anchor Bible)commentary
  • Umberto Cassuto, A Commentary on the Book of Genesis, Part II: From Noah to Abrahamcommentary
  • Claus Westermann, Genesis 1-11 (Continental Commentary)commentary
  • Bruce K. Waltke, Genesis: A Commentary (Zondervan)commentary
  • Robert Alter, The Five Books of Moses: A Translation with Commentarycommentary
  • John H. Walton, Genesis (NIV Application Commentary)commentary
  • Benjamin J. Noonan, Non-Semitic Loanwords in the Hebrew Bible (2019)monograph
  • Robert S. P. Beekes, Etymological Dictionary of Greek (Brill, 2010)lexicon
  • Frederick E. Greenspahn, Hapax Legomena in Biblical Hebrew (Scholars Press, 1984)monograph
  • Harold R. Cohen, Biblical Hapax Legomena in the Light of Akkadian and Ugaritic (Scholars Press, 1978)monograph
  • James Barr, Comparative Philology and the Text of the Old Testament (1968)monograph
  • T. K. Cheyne, Zeitschrift für die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft 18 (1898)article
  • Biblia Hebraica Quinta, Genesis, textual apparatus and commentarycritical-edition
  • Irving Finkel, The Ark Before Noah: Decoding the Story of the Flood (2014)monograph

All attested forms of גֹּפֶר

m s absolute

גֹפֶר

Gen 6:14